°°ToMmY°° said:I don't see anything wrong with them. Those OTs are usually made by people who work in the designing dept or have a passion for it, so they actually use those as a way to improve their skills while doing what they like. What's wrong with that? It's also a way for people like me who doesn't follow games like assassin's creed rev, for example, to catch up with all the info and media released.
I am not sure if a financial benefit motivation is actually more off-putting than the idea that the people who write novella-OTs just really, really want people to buy the game.NHale said:What I really like is when the person that creates an OT receive gifts from the PR person handling that game like it's no big deal.
What. I want gifts. Nintendo, send me gifts for my Star Fox OT.NHale said:What I really like is when the person that creates an OT receive gifts from the PR person handling that game like it's no big deal.
herod said:Again, I think you're agreeing with the OP, because a genuinely useful OP is worth far more than a carefully constructed advert on how to buy the game and what DLC and review scores it received.
DaBuddaDa said:What results is masturbatory and useless to most readers. This is a gaming discussion forum, not a PR factory.
Not bad but too many screen shots, even if they are hotlinkedChet Rippo said:So, how did I do for my first |OT|?
Good? Bad?
By this logic, shouldn't this post not exist?Woo-Fu said:People who complain about opt-in threads instead of simply opting-out are a plague on this board. This isn't remedial English, nobody is making you read anything you don't want to.
moreover, this kind of yawning fanboy rubbing material only serves to set up a sycophantic worship tone for the rest of the thread, stifling rational debate. how dare anyone criticize a king in his own palace?
ShockingAlberto said:By this logic, shouldn't this post not exist?
Good. There are images but the important info is all in text, and therefore searchable. Not to mention it is kept to a small amount of posts (one). Well done.Chet Rippo said:So, how did I do for my first |OT|?
Good? Bad?
The Kirby one posted is a good example. Other good examples are Cursed Crusade, Neptunia, and Street Fighter.Willy105 said:I'm going to do some market research here.
Tell me what you think would be an appropriate design for an OP should be.
From the responses, it seems that a short, easy to read disclaimer with the release date and price would be useful as the first thing you see in an OP.
What comes next?
Enosh said:I hope a game you like will be granted such "privileges" just to see your reaction
ThisIsNeoGafDude.gifFStop7 said:Is there literally nothing someone will find a reason to cry and whine about on the Internet?
I agree, although I look at them and depending on the game, I will read up on facts.Wario64 said:LOL at Assassins Creed OT. That's cool, I will never read the first page ever.
Stating an argument in attempt to improve the quality of posting in our forum is "crying and whining"?FStop7 said:Is there literally nothing someone will find a reason to cry and whine about on the Internet?
Apparently, any form of criticism on the Internet is considered crying and whining, no matter how motivated and constructive.DaBuddaDa said:Stating an argument in attempt to improve the quality of posting in our forum is "crying and whining"?
When did that happen?NHale said:What I really like is when the person that creates an OT receive gifts from the PR person handling that game like it's no big deal.
EDIT: WTF 15 posts for an OT? Ridiculous.
ShockingAlberto said:By this logic, shouldn't this post not exist?
WickedLaharl said:Going beyond one post is never necessary.
Yeah. I'm still waiting for my Mortal Kombat, Motoheroz, Skylanders and Solatorobo gifts...aside the ones they already sent to me; but obviously never arrived.NHale said:What I really like is when the person that creates an OT receive gifts from the PR person handling that game like it's no big deal.
DaBuddaDa said:Stating an argument in attempt to improve the quality of posting in our forum is "crying and whining"?
My eyes aren't the greatest and I can't afford to lose them you know. It'd be nice if I could actually read half of the stuff in the huge OT's(or at least ctrl+f some stuff).Woo-Fu said:People who complain about opt-in threads instead of simply opting-out are a plague on this board. This isn't remedial English, nobody is making you read anything you don't want to.
I'm saying the OPs themselves go overboard in containing extraneous information like entire histories of everything in the context of the franchise, that they make it hard to find the information someone needs WHEN they need that information, that is saying when someone indeed does read the OP. Someone else said it best, if I wanted to read that shit I'd go to Wikipedia. Table of Contents somewhat help this, but you still have that extraneous, sometimes even miscellaneous, stuff in the way.fernoca said:That's the thing, how it is overboard?
If every OT since then was "huge" Id agree, but this year Mortal Kombat, Battlefield 3. Assassin's Creed Revelations, Modern Warfare 3? That's 4 games; 4 OTs.
Maybe add a few more I'm probably missing and is like what..10?
There are hundreds of games released every year; with most getting either an OT or some general discussion thread. Less than 10% of the OTs been "big or "bloated" is not what I'd consider overboard.
Stumpokapow said:Knowing gish, he would laugh. He's got a pretty anarchic spirit to him, I can't imagine him the type to have his own sacred cows.
Then highlight that and don't start a moral crusade against it.PopcornMegaphone said:Good design includes being clear and concise.
OldJadedGamer said:I would comment but I clicked these threads at the same time but the AssCreed OT is still loading...