Neverthelesser
Member
Didn't see anything posted after doing a couple searches. Not sure how Bloomberg is viewed around here, but seeing as a few contributors/commentators from other news organizations (NBC, CNN, MSNBC) are talking about it on Twitter, I figured it was worth some merit. Interesting highlights bolded:
More at the link: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/arti...gton-loves-general-mcmaster-but-trump-doesn-t
Here's the WSJ article it's referencing.
A potential firing of General McMaster would be a good way to deflect some attention away from the Yates-Clapper hearing, and I'm sure Bannon would be pleased...
More at the link: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/arti...gton-loves-general-mcmaster-but-trump-doesn-t
For the Washington establishment, President Donald Trump's decision to make General H.R. McMaster his national security adviser in February was a masterstroke. Here is a well-respected defense intellectual, praised by both parties, lending a steady hand to a chaotic White House. The grown-ups are back.
But inside the White House, the McMaster pick has not gone over well with the one man who matters most. White House officials tell me Trump himself has clashed with McMaster in front of his staff.
On policy, the faction of the White House loyal to senior strategist Steve Bannon is convinced McMaster is trying to trick the president into the kind of nation building that Trump campaigned against. Meanwhile the White House chief of staff, Reince Priebus, is blocking McMaster on a key appointment.
McMaster's allies and adversaries inside the White House tell me that Trump is disillusioned with him. This professional military officer has failed to read the president -- by not giving him a chance to ask questions during briefings, at times even lecturing Trump.
Presented with the evidence of this buyer's remorse, the White House on Sunday evening issued a statement from Trump: "I couldn't be happier with H.R. He's doing a terrific job."
Other White House officials however tell me this is not the sentiment the president has expressed recently in private. Trump was livid, according to three White House officials, after reading in the Wall Street Journal that McMaster had called his South Korean counterpart to assure him that the president's threat to make that country pay for a new missile defense system was not official policy. These officials say Trump screamed at McMaster on a phone call, accusing him of undercutting efforts to get South Korea to pay its fair share.
This was not an isolated incident. Trump has complained in front of McMaster in intelligence briefings about "the general undermining my policy," according to two White House officials. The president has given McMaster less face time. McMaster's requests to brief the president before some press interviews have been declined. Over the weekend, McMaster did not accompany Trump to meet with Australia's prime minister; the outgoing deputy national security adviser, K.T. McFarland, attended instead.
Here's the WSJ article it's referencing.
A potential firing of General McMaster would be a good way to deflect some attention away from the Yates-Clapper hearing, and I'm sure Bannon would be pleased...