Or that, but have fun finding anything that checks all the boxes of total realism. So long as a narrative is internally consistent and I can keep suspending my disbelief, I can find enjoyment in things that aren’t hyper realistic.Or people just genuinely demand different things from their stories...
Or that, but have fun finding anything that checks all the boxes of total realism.
Just curious: can you re-articulate your actual position? Because I’m through episode 5 now and there’s a ton of backstory told through flashbacks which explains why Mizu is how she is. Nothing feels “woke” or “Mary Sue” or “unearned.” (Those aren’t quotes I’m attributing to you)Another misrepresentation of your opponents position.
Episode 2 is the most animated nakedness I have ever seen.
One criticism I have is if I hear this fucking song in one more piece of media I’m gonna lose it:
It totally took me out of it when it showed up. Like JFC this is the Wilhelm scream of “badass intro song” at this point
Episode 2 is the most animated nakedness I have ever seen.
Mix. It wax mostly male nudity.Were they are fugly? Which is usually the case with most "Western Anime"
Netflix. Probably one of the most woke content creators in existence.Cough Cough
WOKE
Netflix. Probably one of the most woke content creators in existence.
In todays world, Trinity would be gay as fuck.Its legit hard to talk about anything on this site anymore without it devolving into just complete nonsensical culture war BS, and thats sad.
A protagonist being really good at something should not give you pause in year of our lord 2023. No one asked why trinity was so good at what she did in matrix. No one asked for a training montage. She was just THAT good.
Its legit hard to talk about anything on this site anymore without it devolving into just complete nonsensical culture war BS, and thats sad.
A protagonist being really good at something should not give you pause in year of our lord 2023. No one asked why trinity was so good at what she did in matrix. No one asked for a training montage. She was just THAT good.
In todays world, Trinity would be gay as fuck.
And noticing woke shit is not exclusive to neogaf.
Believability in fiction has been a talking point since the dawn of time. This is not a topic that was brought to us by "the culture war".
Im sure you know this, but Trinity being a badass in The Matrix is completely different considering the narrative makes it significantly more plausible.
No it doesn't lol. If anything, the dudes shes kicking the asses of in the movie are agents with superhuman abilities created by alien supercomputers so they should be even harder to take down than some samurai.
She still kicks their asses. And no one questioned it. Because as I said, there was a time you didn't have to explain WHY someone was good at something in a movie, they could just tell you "this character is really good at this thing" and you didn't have to demand a training montages.
There are many; many other examples of this i could give, like Leia, lara croft, and even Furiosa. The culture war has indeed invited selective overanalyzation and overcorrection to fix a problem that was never there before.
No. Her understanding she's in a digital simulation provides the plausible explanation for why she can do crazy ****.
No. Believability has always been a topic of discussion in fiction.
Different people have different standards for what's plausible and what isn't.Believability has always been a topic applied SELECTIVELY. The parameters for that believability have changed dramatically however even still.
I don't know what you're referring to here. Who has issues with Ripley from Aliens?The examples I listed, none of them are shown doing ANY training at any point. Yet they are not questioned when shown being competent in combat, or various other skilled tasks. We can also throw Ripley in there, i know thats the obvious one and redundant but it also applies.
All the characters in the Matrix have different levels of understanding about The Matrix. Spirituality and wisdom are not gendered so Trinity understanding her reality better than others is completely plausible.Most of the characters knew they were in a simulation in matrix. Yet, she's considered the best fighter of them all by far and saves Neos ass on multiple occasions.
I don't know who this is, but modern movies are filled with overt "girl power" pandering. If this Isla Faust is beating Ving Rames in arm wrestling, I will join you in saying it's crappy writing.Another more modern era character is ilsa faust from the mission impossible movies. Shes introduced as an ex agent who is simply really good at basically everything, guns, translation, espionage, subterfuge.... shes awesome. no one batted an eye far as I know.
Different people have different standards for what's plausible and what isn't.
No one. Thats the point. She also displays expertise at things she shouldn't have, and is adept in handling a situation none of the crew are prepared for.I don't know what you're referring to here. Who has issues with Ripley from Aliens?
All the characters in the Matrix have different levels of understanding about The Matrix. Spirituality and wisdom are not gendered so Trinity understanding her reality better than others is completely plausible.
So what you're saying is you'll only accept an instance of a female defeating a male in an explicitly fantastical series if magic is involved? This is just more proof of selective eyes for these things.The Blue Eye Samurai girl kicking butt despite being significantly smaller and having access to inferior training is not. She needs the blue moonstone to give her supernatural abilities for it to make sense. Instead, she tosses 3 trained Samurai through a wall because the ResetERA algorithm demanded it.
I don't know who this is, but modern movies are filled with overt "girl power" pandering. If this Isla Faust is beating Ving Rames in arm wrestling, I will join you in saying it's crappy writing.
What did Ripley display an expertise in that seemed unrealistic to you?No one. Thats the point. She also displays expertise at things she shouldn't have, and is adept in handling a situation none of the crew are prepared for.
I think history has a lot of fascinating examples of females besting males when it comes to combat. They are never through brute force though. It's always through something females aren't innately inferior at.So what you're saying is you'll only accept an instance of a female defeating a male in an explicitly fantastical series if magic is involved? This is just more proof of selective eyes for these things.
I didn't see it that way at all. She threw 3 guys through a wall because it's easy to do so and their target audience won't care. It's as silly as Steve Buscemi playing the muscle in a movie. Steve Buscemi isn't the muscle. Steve Buscemi is the pedophile in Con Air who preys on the weak.Tossing people through a wall isn't that hard given the time period and pretty much everyone around having some familiarity with martial arts.
I would argue all 3 scenarios are significantly more plausible than the stuff found in BES.I watched Bane in the dark knight rises bunch though a cement pillar with his bare hands. Ive watched Tom cruise play a 50 something year old being hit by a moving car, getting up and continuing to run. I've seen Arnold swarzenegger throw a combat knife with enough force to pin a man to a tree. All of these are unrealistic, not one questions them.
There's a difference between Kill Bill in 2003 and Netflix producing their 500th "woman strong + good, men weak and bad" show. Kill Bill didn't give off immense ESG, DEI, WEF vibes like BES does.Im not saying she's written poorly, I think she's awesome.
You and no problem with the bride defeating 80 trained adult male warriors on her lonesome did you? I thought it was a pretty cool action scene.
This is peak YouTube brainThere's a difference between Kill Bill in 2003 and Netflix producing their 500th "woman strong + good, men weak and bad" show. Kill Bill didn't give off immense ESG, DEI, WEF vibes like BES does.
I think technically you are correct, but I felt that a lot of the issues I had with this show were due to tone and just feeling unearned by the writing.Her strength was addressed, her training was addressed, her swordmaster was someone she prayed for because she loved him like a father... No one knew she was a girl because she hid it. So many of these criticisms are answered in the first 3 episodes.
Blue Eye Samurai Episode 5 is a perfect example of what episodic TV storytelling can produce. It wouldn’t work without the foundation provided by the four chapters that precede it, nor could it stand on its own as a feature film.
The episode can exist only how it does, which is as a structurally ambitious, nesting-doll experiment in visual storytelling that both redefines everything you’ve seen before it and propels the show’s overarching narrative forward.
Fair criticisms IMO. While I did like the show as a whole, I really didn’t like the main character at all. This can work in a longer series where she opens up, grows as a person becomes more likable as it goes on, but already the first season she comes across as miserable, not nice to anyone and generally unlikable.I think technically you are correct, but I felt that a lot of the issues I had with this show were due to tone and just feeling unearned by the writing.
Take her strength for example. She is wearing steel arms and leg braces the whole time. This was great for that "You don't know this, but I'm not left handed" type scene where she drops the weights to improve her speed. Buuuuuut the character design does NOT fit. She is a very slim wisp of a girl, not someone that looks like they are walking around with 10 pounds on each limb and has been training to fight every day since childhood.
Then she transforms these things into a spear, something that was totally out of left field (for me), and that becomes her weapon of choice for half the show, not her sword. The same sword that featured so prominently in the first half, has this mysterious exotic origin, and ends up being totally irrelevant. They teased this GREAT plot that she could be possessed by a demon and that explains her abilities but nope.....
She shows great skill in the first half of the show, so you can kinda buy that she is a bit of a prodigy plus some fancy tricks along with the ego of some of her opponents, but by the end she is straight up impervious to pain, an arrow through her Achilles is just flesh wound, and she is DECIMATING legions with ease.....until she runs into a big fat irishman who ragdolls her. So the show started off fairly grounded but ended up in Dynasty Warriors levels of gameness.
Then there is her gender. She is straight up a girl. Talks like a girl, looks like a girl, built like a girl. Apparently all she has to do is put on some yellow glasses and dress in a slightly different robe and suddenly she is 100% convincing as a man. This never felt earned in the show, and ultimately other than getting through a gate in some scene, I'm not sure it even had any relevance to the plot. It serves for some "sexist japanese" bits but I never thought that this contrivance was worth it, versus just having her be an onna-musha/bugeisha from the get go and dealing with that level of interaction. Given the highly gendered aspects of japanese society, I felt that this should have played into the show more, like an extended bit where she, dressed as a man, failed to act "man enough" in some ways, or had to play a woman but did so very poorly because she was untutored in all that was expected of her (though I realize she did live as a woman for at least a few years). If you are gonna do the sex swap thing, you ought to lean into it.
Anyway, I did enjoy most of the show from a visual level, though I greatly preferred the grounded feel of the first half of the season versus the more outlandish second half. Hopefully the move to london will bring in some interesting elements beyond just having japanese aesthetics trump dirty english every time. I can already see the temptations the writiers are facing in my head and I hope they can restrain themselves.
Yeah, I kinda withheld my feelings about that because I think I have a pretty strong bias towards male anti-hero types in this mold that isn't really fair towards the female versions of it. But thats because I think the negative aspects of this character archetype is better represented with men in general. Mizu, for someone on a destructive path of revenge at all costs, didn't really seem to have many problems or repercussions from it. She was still attractive and could land any guy she wanted. She didn't seem bothered by losing time for children. She gained the loyalty of others with virtually no effort despite rarely reciprocating. I feel like I tolerate those personality traits in a guy like Reacher/Banshee (who, let's be honest, is a virtually identical archetype) than a, say, Mare of Eastwood/Danvers&Navarro [True Dectective s4] character and I suspect, for me, it's the gender that is the critical thing. Lone Wolves work for me as men, not so much as women, despite Hollywood throwing dozens of them at me each year and some prominent historical models on which to base them. There is a male power fantasy aspect to it for sure.Fair criticisms IMO. While I did like the show as a whole, I really didn’t like the main character at all. This can work in a longer series where she opens up, grows as a person becomes more likable as it goes on, but already the first season she comes across as miserable, not nice to anyone and generally unlikable.
Yeah, I kinda withheld my feelings about that because I think I have a pretty strong bias towards male anti-hero types in this mold that isn't really fair towards the female versions of it. But thats because I think the negative aspects of this character archetype is better represented with men in general. Mizu, for someone on a destructive path of revenge at all costs, didn't really seem to have many problems or repercussions from it. She was still attractive and could land any guy she wanted. She didn't seem bothered by losing time for children. She gained the loyalty of others with virtually no effort despite rarely reciprocating. I feel like I tolerate those personality traits in a guy like Reacher/Banshee (who, let's be honest, is a virtually identical archetype) than a, say, Mare of Eastwood/Danvers&Navarro [True Dectective s4] character and I suspect, for me, it's the gender that is the critical thing. Lone Wolves work for me as men, not so much as women, despite Hollywood throwing dozens of them at me each year and some prominent historical models on which to base them. There is a male power fantasy aspect to it for sure.