BRONSOB, EH
the broke and the torque
BRONSOB, EH
Well it's absolutely not two times, that's way too low unless litterly nothing was spent on marketing and everything else.Did you read this entire thread before posting that? Matt's 4 times rule isn't even close and has already been debunked... it may be 2 times but even that might not apply to big budget movies because their advertising costs are less relative to their budget.
Never-mind, I see you saw kswis's post.
Well it's absolutely not two times, that's way too low unless litterly nothing was spent on marketing and everything else.
I'm actually thinking about this more and trying to trace the people I have asked about it.
WB guy told me it the first time.
A Sony VP said that was about right.
Someone in development at Fox said that seemed high "but who knows."
And a Disney woman refused to talk about it.
That WB guy was at a fundraiser in 2012 I think.
What is going on in this thread?! o.o
The rule of thumb Matt is speaking about does ring true (and depends when that conversation with the WB exec happened), but belongs in a different era: the 1990's and early 2000's where marketing campaigns weren't as expensive as they are today.
Edit: kswis did goood
The first couple of pages of this thread have so much trash information.
700M+ films with $175M budgets are now big money losers. 300M DOM is trash.
GoTG must have bombed big time with its 200M budget. Ant-Man is a bomb and so was TWS.
So speaking about the actual profitability of films; there is this blog run by a producer of indiefilms (and he has written for various film related publications) that takes a look at data and statistics surrounding films. I've seen it mentioned by people whom I respect so I'm assuming that he is in the right ballpark;
How movies make money: $100m+ Hollywood blockbusters
Unfortunately the article is way too long to compress into a couple of pull quotes but I'll try to include some key points and graphs.
He also has an article just talking about profitability. Which includes this gem:
I can't personally vouch for it being 100% accurate, but it is above the usual armchair analysis.
All $100M+ blockbusters $100M+ Super hero films (since 2008)
Avg WW gross (minus China) $350M $605M
Reported Production Budget $150M $185M
Gross/Budget Ratio 2.33x 3.29x
Not a bad drop for Kubo. I'm gutted my nieces don't like the look of it because it means I have to wait for the blu ray to watch it.
Hope it does ok for Laika but sure a small loss on it won't hurt them too much.
I can't believe we're back to thinking WB budgeted Suicide Squad with the prospect that it was going to make over 800M worldwide. It was ludicrous thinking last week, it still is now.
Was there discussion about MoS losing WB money back then? I remember the legs being kinda shit and laughs about the possibility of Thor 2 beating it worldwide (which almost happened) but I don't recall people saying it lost WB money...
I can't believe we're back to thinking WB budgeted Suicide Squad with the prospect that it was going to make over 800M worldwide. It was ludicrous thinking last week, it still is now.
Was there discussion about MoS losing WB money back then? I remember the legs being kinda shit and laughs about the possibility of Thor 2 beating it worldwide (which almost happened) but I don't recall people saying it lost WB money...
Since everyone's still arguing:
Chinese grosses are great for boosting those Worldwide totals to impressive numbers, but studios only take 25% of the gross from China, and ancillary revenue is like 10x lower than it is domestically (though that situation is starting to improve). $90M of domestic gross is about the same as $200M of Chinese gross, not considering any other revenue but box office. If you factor in everything else, it's probably closer to $50M domestic (or $60-75M in Europe) is as good as $200M in China.
Civil War and Age of Ultron were by far the two biggest comic films in China, and even in those cases, we are talking about another $45M and 60M going to Marvel Studios respectively (Marvel's theatre cut outside of China for those two films was about $450M for Civil War and $525-550M for Age of Ultron). As such, I think you can mostly discard China when trying to get an idea of Superhero movie success. At best, it bumps the worldwide theatre cut by 10-15% and the ancillary revenue cut by 1-2%. Often less.
Also, China has only been a significant part of worldwide superhero grosses since 2012 (with $90M+ grosses becoming frequent in 2014). Setting it aside provides an apples to apples comparison to anything released earlier.
Below is a chart of every comic book Superhero film (minus the super low budget stuff) released since the MCU started. Each film is listed alongside their worldwide gross without China inflating things, their reported budgets (some of these differ from what is listed on BOM if we got clarifying budget reports after the film was released), and their gross to budget ratios.
Suicide Squad is listed at the bottom along with an estimated final gross range based on current trajectories.
Code:Title Worldwide minus China Reported Budget Gross/Budget Ratio Avengers $1434M $220M 6.52x Avengers: Age of Ultron $1165M $265M 4.40x Iron Man 3 $1094M $200M 5.47x The Dark Knight Rises $1032M $230M 4.49x The Dark Knight $1005M $185M 5.43x Captain America: Civil War $962M $250M 3.85x Deadpool $783M $58M 13.5x Batman v Superman $777M $250M 3.11x Amazing Spider-Man $709M $230M 3.08x Guardians of the Galaxy $677M $195M 3.47x X-Men: Days of Future Past $632M $200M 3.16x Iron Man 2 $616M $200M 3.08x The Amazing Spider-Man 2 $615M $290M 2.12x Man of Steel $605M $225M 2.69x Captain America: The Winter Soldier $598M $170M 3.52x Thor: The Dark World $589M $170M 3.46x Big Hero 6 $574M $165M 3.48x Iron Man $570M $150M 3.80x Thor $449M $150M 2.99x X-Men: Apocalypse $420M $178M 2.36x Ant-Man $414M $130M 3.18x The Wolverine $374M $120M 3.12x X-Men Origins: Wolverine $373M $150M 2.49x Captain America: The First Avenger $371M $140M 2.65x X-men: First Class $354M $150M 2.36x The Incredible Hulk $254M $150M 1.69x Green Lantern $220M $200M 1.10x The Green Hornet $208M $120M 1.73x Watchmen $185M $130M 1.42x Fantastic Four (2015) $168M $120M 1.40x Hellboy 2: The Golden Army $158M $85M 1.86x Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengence $133M $57M 2.33x Suicide Squad $700-730M $175M 4.00-4.17x
Without getting into bullshit about super high marketing above and beyond all of these other films that had ubiquitous marketing efforts as well, how can one justify Suicide Squad not being a success, given the stats on every other film in the genre? Even if the reported $175M budget was under by $50M (making the film $225M), Suicide Squad's gross to budget ratio would still be in the >3x MCU range on that low end $700M gross.
I thought the opposite. It's going to struggle to hit 300m stateside, and won't hit the 800m it needed worldwide to make an actual profit according to the various rumours and articles released beforehand. Like every DC movie, it's not a bomb but it fails to live up to the potential and sends audiences away with a bad taste in the mouth.
MESS @ this thread becoming Matt vs. Neogaf.![]()
Busty stop bringing up Tarzan, it just makes me look stupid
Busty stop bringing up Tarzan, it just makes me look stupid
I'm amazed!!!!
It's going to beat Superman.
A fucking movie about Harley Quinn featuring a cameo from Joker is going to beat Superman at the box office.
That's crazy to me and I didn't think it would happen! Especially with the garbage reviews, I was expecting super shitty legs and it's held in there. Good on em.
I'm amazed!!!!
It's going to beat Superman.
A fucking movie about Harley Quinn featuring a cameo from Joker is going to beat Superman at the box office.
That's crazy to me and I didn't think it would happen! Especially with the garbage reviews, I was expecting super shitty legs and it's held in there. Good on em.
How convenient.
So why bring it up at all? If it's normal for superhero films to fail in theaters but make money through merchandise and media sales, there's no point in using that formula to determine a film's success. It doesn't even check out with the Thor franchise either, because the second film lost them millions.
Dualshockers
IN 2016
Deadline did a breakdown for ASM2 including estimated/sourced data from DVD sales and TV deals.
http://deadline.com/2015/03/amazing-spider-man-2-profit-box-office-2014-1201389608/
They estimated it netted $70.38M profit when all is said and done.
I think someone earlier brought up only 1 film from summer making the domestic top 5 this year, but Finding Dory, Secret Life of Pets, and Civil War should all make the final list. I dont think we will be getting 3 more films past the $365-370M mark this year.
Man, people suck. I wasn't preaching anything, just talking. On a discussion board. About things topic related. Calmly and politely. About a topic I have some knowledge of. And I was perfectly willing to adapt my point of view based on the discussion.Matt, you should stick to the insider stuff. Not preach some shaky ass math and then try to peddle it into some WB exec.
Dont go out of your comfort zone and dont get SWASS.
Man, people suck. I wasn't preaching anything, just talking. On a discussion board. About things topic related. Calmly and politely. About a topic I have some knowledge of. And I was perfectly willing to adapt my point of view based on the discussion.
Ugh. I'm sorry I may have...overestimated the marketing budget of some major motion pictures? That is a serious sin. You're right, the only value I have to anyone here is dropping sweet insider info. I'll shut up otherwise.
Just got back from Kubo what a fantastic movie! I hope it has some steady legs at least for a little bit. It's definitely one of my favorites that I've seen this year.
Man, people suck. I wasn't preaching anything, just talking. On a discussion board. About things topic related. Calmly and politely. About a topic I have some knowledge of. And I was perfectly willing to adapt my point of view based on the discussion.
Ugh. I'm sorry I may have...overestimated the marketing budget of some major motion pictures? That is a serious sin. You're right, the only value I have to anyone here is dropping sweet insider info. I'll shut up otherwise.
A war zone. Bring your flame shields.I think it's time for a best/worst summer movies 2016 thread. Someone want to make it?
Man, people suck. I wasn't preaching anything, just talking. On a discussion board. About things topic related. Calmly and politely. About a topic I have some knowledge of. And I was perfectly willing to adapt my point of view based on the discussion.
Ugh. I'm sorry I may have...overestimated the marketing budget of some major motion pictures? That is a serious sin. You're right, the only value I have to anyone here is dropping sweet insider info. I'll shut up otherwise.
I think it's time for a best/worst summer movies 2016 thread. Someone want to make it?
A war zone. Bring your flame shields.
Has paramount released a successful movie this year?
I'll light it on fire.I will walk into it, poop on the floor, and spell out B E Y O N D as the top movie