bobby kotick lawsuit against gaming journalist for defamation

let them fight fighting GIF
 
Where in the world did you get that idea?


Trying Not To Laugh Rooster Teeth GIF by Achievement Hunter

There's a lot of context in this article that's missing. People seem to forget employee suicides were regular in Chinese manufacturing facilities, there was actual slave labor and mistreatment going on.



 
Did not read article, just headline, but those type of people are fucking crazy.

For instance, saw a post on reddit yesterday about somebody refusing to eat at Chick-fil-A, because Chick-fil-A supposedly supports killing LGBT people.

Not sure where they come up with this nonsense. I think they think they're fighting the good fight, but they just look batshit insane.
More Chick-fil-a for everyone else
 
Bobby Kotick shall be circumcised by Jason Schreier's teeth for all he has done...

But not before taking Kotaku and all its 'yurnalizt' down for good. 😎
 
They've earned it and so much more. Doesn't matter how much I don't like Bobby, I will never miss an opportunity to dunk on game journos.
 
Bobby has so much money that he could buy these publications and close them down, but suing them out of existence is probably more fun, lol.
 
Last edited:
Kotaku is stupid and has been stupid for well over a decade at this point. Same with Bobby, who is also a walking POS as far as we know.

I'm not rooting for either. I'm more along the lines of...
Awesome Let Them Fight GIF by Legendary Entertainment
 
I'm conflicted about this. Both parties involved are terrible. Each in their own way. So, I'm just like...

let them fight fighting GIF


Lol, I guess I'm too late on/echoing the sentiment.
 
Last edited:
I welcome this lawsuit cause fuck kotaku and gizmodo, but i have to question Kotick's motives here. He's no longer in the business hasn't been for a few years nobody has written anything about him for a few years as well, why now and what for? To me this looks like a quick cash grab.
 
Can't be lyin' on folks. Hmmm, I'm thinking how evidence would be presented for this. I mean, prosecution would need to prove malicious intent in furthering a false statement about Bobby. Is it a defense if Kotaku's sources were the ones lying? Not saying they are...I'm just thinking about how Kotaku might try wiggle their way out of this even if they are guilty.

What are the criteria that Kotick's lawyers have to prove exactly?
 
NeoGAF was ground zero for Bobby Kotick notoriety among internet dudes. We didn't know very many execs back then. Obviously he wasn't looked upon kindly, but fuck if I'm going to root against him in this endeavor. I'm on team #BigDickKotick
 
Proof that everyone can been redeemed, if he bankrupts kotaku I can forgive everything he did with Activision
 
Top Bottom