Book of Henry, the latest film from Colin Trevorrow (Ep. 9), is reviewing poorly.

M

MadLaughter

Member
https://thefilmstage.com/reviews/the-book-of-henry-review-colin-trevorrow/

Watching The Book of Henry feels like being gaslit. You want to yell at the screen “This is absurd! Henry’s recorded instructions for Susan predict when she’ll turn the wrong way down the street! Is there going to be any acknowledgement of how insane this is?!” while the movie calmly insists that this is all perfectly natural. That kind of rubbernecking-a-car-crash feeling is the only possible reason to recommend the film, if you’re into that, for whatever reason. Going forward, Colin Trevorrow hopefully won’t be put in charge of anything too impor- oh Jesus, that’s right.
Click to expand...

http://www.slantmagazine.com/film/review/the-book-of-henry

Schmaltzy, manipulative, and tonally schizophrenic, The Book of Henry is such a monumentally misguided venture that it ends up being oddly, if unintentionally, compelling. If not for Colin Trevorrow's bland, listless direction, it would be tempting to read the film as a parody of slushy Hollywood tear-jerkers, a dark satire that uses the uncannily vacuum-sealed mawkishness of a Hallmark Channel movie as an ironic backdrop for a twisted Hitchcockian thriller.
Click to expand...

http://variety.com/2017/film/reviews/the-book-of-henry-review-naomi-watts-1202465743/

There’s the kind of bad movie that just sits there, unfolding with grimly predictable monotony. Then there’s the kind where the badness expands and metastasizes, taking on a jaw-dropping life of its own, pushing through to ever-higher levels of garishness. “The Book of Henry,” directed by Colin Trevorrow from Gregg Hurwitz’s script, is of the latter, you’ve-got-to-see-it-to-disbelieve-it variety.
Click to expand...

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/book-henry-1013737?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

The preposterousness of Gregg Hurwitz's screenplay isn't enough to throw star Naomi Watts off her game, and the actor's sincere performance may suffice to keep a segment of the family-film demographic on board, barely. Another group, though, will find acceptance much harder: Those of us who've allowed ourselves to care about the latest Star Wars trilogy may be made fearful about the prospect of an Episode IX directed by Trevorrow. The garden-variety blockbuster lameness of his Jurassic World was one thing; after this near-catastrophe, can he really be trusted with the fate of the Jedi?
Click to expand...

oMPU9jA.png


DMKuDFU.png


OFb8XRf.png


H2ETwv1.png


Maybe the title's hyperbolic, but Mike Sampson's a former critic, and I think now he's got a high position with Alamo Drafthouse in New York, and seems like he has a good head on his shoulders. This movie sounds wilder than Collateral Beauty, and possibly worse than the F4 movie that got Trank removed.
 
Twitter is too over the top from time to time. The Book of Henry is more than those few people are able to see.
I never doubted Colin. And he never disappointed me.

The Book of Henry combines art with a vision.

See it for yourself in the cinema.
 
He's a white man. Even Josh Trank is getting another shot right away making a Tom Hardy vehicle.

He's making Episode 9.
 
Yeah, after a certain scene in JW, the idea of 'I have no idea what tone is' is hardly surprising. However, I've seen that in so many 2016 movies that I have to wonder if studios aren't seriously understaffed on good editors.

Will need to see the movie to make a serious judgment though.
 
Its probably not that bad as some are saying, but Jurassic World is not good at all and Safety Not Guaranteed was good but nothing amazing. I hope he does get removed from Star Wars simply because he's a bland director and brings absolutely nothing to the table.
 
Still got time to get rid of him, Kathleen. Make it sound like he's got other commitments or some barely believable bullshit excuse, but you still got time.
 
That's... not very encouraging. Though I gotta say, these are very sensationalist. Lots of Star Wars mentions and exaggerated language on how horrifically bad this is ensures site traffic.
F4 movie that got Trank removed.
Click to expand...
Dude got removed because he was high off his head on set, trashing the apartment he was renting, not showing up to work and then pissing off the studio after reviews came in by disowning the movie. Different situation here.
 
I called this years ago. Dude has no idea what he is doing. Safety was an ok (but not great) mumblecore comedy. JW was a executive-controlled popcorn muncher. I have no idea why Hollywood decided to give this man the reings to two of the biggest franchises ever after one mediocre indie movie.
 
Oh you mean the guy who made two terrible movies is on track to make another one.

Surprise​ motherfuckin surprise
 
And this is the guy who had to figure out how not to use Princess Leia after two movies of set up. Episode 9 is fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuucked.
 
I have hope the Lucasfilm Story Group can help turn around any hot mess Trevorrow potentially shoots.

I'm also an eternal optimist, btw. Could bite me in the ass later.
 
JeffZero said:
I have hope the Lucasfilm Story Group can help turn around any hot mess Trevorrow potentially shoots.

I'm also an eternal optimist, btw. Could bite me in the ass later.
Click to expand...
The Lucasfilm Story Group is there to keep things in the universe consistent, and to give suggestions based on their knowledge of Star Wars. I don't think they hold much power.
 
wandering said:
It's a pretty common use of the word
Click to expand...
Yeah, which is why it's a problem cause it reinforces public misunderstanding of a disorder trumpeted as a metaphor. It's an outdated myth thinking schizophrenia is about split personality. People are usually meaning either bipolar or dissociative identity disorder.
 
I've said it all along. I don't think he'll be given enough control to fuck things up. At worst Episode IX will be "passable". Disney won't let him make it terrible.
 
If the film is genuinely as bad as people are saying, I cannot miss it. You don't sit out something in the vein of The Room.
 
daaaaaaaaaaamn


If this blows up enough I'm sure they'll take him off the film. Disney does not want a shitty Marvel or Star Wars movie getting crapped on via RT.


But Jurassic World did still make $1.6 bil...
 
god fucking damnit...

This reminds me of the Sucker Punch reviews that said "This guy is going to direct Superman next?!"

I am so fucking terrified for Episode IX
 
It sounds like he filmed a shitty script. It happens. Although being a writer himself, he should've known better.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

  • Poll
Top 100 Films of the 90s (Which is better, this or the New York Times list?)
16
225
Donald mac Ronald replied
The first ever documented Spider-Man fan film
2
165
kunonabi replied
Denis Villeneuve to direct the next James Bond film
2 3 4
164
1K
jason10mm replied
Mindhunter (Netflix) could get closure with 3 films from David Fincher
29
795
Audiophile replied
Project Hail Mary - Ryan Gosling Film
2
57
597
MrTroubleMaker replied
Top Bottom