Not sure if this was posted anywhere but this was posted on FB -
Mad Men in a couple weeks. Game of Thrones from April to June. Breaking Bad in July.
Finally, Good TV is back. Walking Dead is so bad.
Not sure if this was posted anywhere but this was posted on FB -
Mad Men in a couple weeks. Game of Thrones from April to June. Breaking Bad in July.
Finally, Good TV is back. Walking Dead is so bad.
umm how is it a waste of time for viewers? We know it happened, it adds depth to walt in this example, it affected the way we look at things quite strongly. And if Jesse never finds out it won't make the impact on us any less.Good shows don't do actually do this because it's a waste of time. Why go through the effort of setting up a major conflict, and then not have any payoff whatsoever, when you could just not set up in the first place?
Shaggy dog stories, aborted arcs, etc. are meant to be avoided.
Nothing official from AMC, but everyone is assuming that's what's going to happen and Anna Gunn mentioned that they're going to split it in a recent interview.Has it been confirmed yet whether or not AMC is splitting up season 5?
Has it been confirmed yet whether or not AMC is splitting up season 5?
http://i.imgur.com/beBha.png[img]
Not like he knows or anything - but July seems likely[/QUOTE]
his twitter profile pic makes him look like some crazy redneck
Sorry in advance if it's already been mentioned but I saw Ted in a Miracle Grow commercial last night.![]()
Editor's note: Each episode of AMC's drama Breaking Bad starts with a prologue or teaser. Some of these advance the season's ongoing plot. Others feel like self-contained, at times experimental short films. We wondered: If you strung all of the opening scenes from the various seasons together in chronological order, would the show's basic narrative make sense? And, if people who had never watched Breaking Bad watched only these curtain-raisers, would they come away with a more or less accurate impression of the show? Or would it seem like a different program entirely?
We asked Press Play contributor Dave Bunting, Jr. to edit the prologues together in chronological order to create two self-contained Breaking Bad movies, one covering Seasons 1 and 2, the other covering 3 and 4. Then we asked another Press Play contributor, Sheila O'Malley -- who has never seen a frame of the series -- to watch the two compilations and write down her impressions. Sheila was asked not to read any supplementary material before or during the experiment, and she agreed. Her written account is derived entirely from having watched Dave's compilations. Shorn of everything but its openings, was Breaking Bad still Breaking Bad? Read on and see.
Just finished Season 4.
Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamn
So I'm assuming the only possible big problems for Walt will be the Cartel. I'm assuming his family will find out whats up in Season 5 too.
Ok, I've gotta say that I'm massively disappointed about this show. Currently halfway through Season 3 and I've just got to ask: does it get better? I mean no offense, but I completely fail to see why this is such a loved show. It does have it's awesome moments, but for the most part it's the same inane bullshit back and forth every single episode...
The story is kind of ok, the premise is brilliant, but absolutely misused and mostly wasted because of very shallow one dimentional characters... Walt is 70% great, but everyone else is just uninteresting and predictable. Every single character other than Walt feels way to familiar and stale. I don't know, maybe it's me but I was expecting something better. Considering the hype behind it I was expecting it to at least be better than jut "okay".
Bottom line, does it get any better from now on?
I'm halfway through season 3, right afterHank punches Jesse after the whole fabricated phone call regarding Marie.
If you don't like it by now you probably never will tbh
(except for the villains... how about a little effort on that department?)
Bottom line, does it get any better from now on?
I'm halfway through season 3, right afterHank punches Jesse after the whole fabricated phone call regarding Marie.
if you fail to see it, maybe it's just not for you. That's totally weird and not normal and you should feel bad, but not for you none the less. But you've watched so much, might as well just finish it.Ok, I've gotta say that I'm massively disappointed about this show. Currently halfway through Season 3 and I've just got to ask: does it get better? I mean no offense, but I completely fail to see why this is such a loved show. It does have it's awesome moments, but for the most part it's the same inane bullshit back and forth every single episode...
The story is kind of ok, the premise is brilliant, but absolutely misused and mostly wasted because of very shallow one dimentional characters... Walt is 70% great, but everyone else is just uninteresting and predictable. Every single character other than Walt feels way to familiar and stale. I don't know, maybe it's me but I was expecting something better. Considering the hype behind it I was expecting it to at least be better than jut "okay".
Bottom line, does it get any better from now on?
I'm halfway through season 3, right afterHank punches Jesse after the whole fabricated phone call regarding Marie.
wtffff Gus is one of the best villains ever
This is the Season 4 thread. Everything up through S4 is fair game since it's already aired, so I'm not sure what you were expecting. If you'd like to discuss the series on your terms, make or use a LTTP thread.Thanks for the spoilers, btw. oO
if you fail to see it, maybe it's just not for you. That's totally weird and not normal and you should feel bad, but not for you none the less. But you've watched so much, might as well just finish it.
This is the Season 4 thread. Everything up through S4 is fair game since it's already aired, so I'm not sure what you were expecting. If you'd like to discuss the series on your terms, make or use a LTTP thread.
Not for me? I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean. When a show's good, it's universally good, for everyone excluding anyone with particular sensibilites (for example, of course The Wire's gonna be a bad show for gammy, as she loathes violence). I'm completely open minded about the show and like I've said, I liked it so far. But it's very far from the quintessential end-all be-all of drama television that everyone keeps hailing it as. The writing is nowhere near HBO level of quality and most characters are very very shallow. And I do agree with Avinexus that they do tend to stretch things out a bit.
Don't know what to tell ya, it's universally praised and praised heavily at that. And like you said, the problem must be with you then, something isn't gelling for you for some reason. Hence it's not for you.
What you have right here is the exact opposite of a convincing argument. Claiming "if we're being honest" as if everyone else is lying to themselves and then rattling off several other shows doesn't defend or reinforce a single one of the statements you've made. If anything, it weakens them by showing that you haven't come up with a way of defending them. Don't ruin yourself like that.Meh. It's praised to a point where I agree. Mad Men, Boardwalk Empire and Game of Thrones are still the heavy hitters and yes, I do concede that BB is the 4th best show on american TV and it does get praised accordingly... it gets the right amount of praise.
The whole "it must be me" thing is just a way for people to not freak out at me, but if we're being honest Breaking Bad is a decent, no... a GOOD drama. But still many levels of greatness below giants like The Wire, Dekalog, Deadwood or Alexanderplatz. It's not a matter of me not "getting" it, I think it's a matter of me expecting outstanding quality and being presented with a product that's just decent.
The real question here is... why is this getting hyped... I don't understand, as it's not a very adrenalin-high show. It's a slowly unraveling drama with some splashes of action. it makes me wonder... why not Boardwalk? Why not Mad Men? Why Breaking Bad? oO
Heh, seems like someone doesn't quite understand how criticism can work. There is no universal good. Ever. Subjectivity is unavoidable. Shows (and all piece of media or art) have qualitative elements that you can use to support your subjective opinions, which is what makes the opinions of some better defended than that of others, but nothing is concrete.
The writing's pretty great. The frequent parallel, symbolic situations that occur never seem forced and they illustrate a lot about each character's motivation. An example would be Walt forcing Jr. to drink. It was completely separated from the main plot, but it showcased the agression that had been growing inside Walt since the beginning of his drug dealings and how his short-sightedness and volatility were beginning to impact his family negatively. I'd also argue that this kind of thing lends depth to the characters. Jesse Pinkman has been expertly developed. Every stage of his in the show, from bright-eyed punk to a man vacated of all emotions but self-hatred, has unveiled a new facet of his persona that feels organic when set alongside the ones before it. He's caring but misguided. He's a good judge of morals when he tries hard to be, but far too often he's much too weak to step back and form an opinion. Jesse's a man of contradictions that somehow brilliantly form a cohesive person.
What you have right here is the exact opposite of a convincing argument. Claiming "if we're being honest" as if everyone else is lying to themselves and then rattling off several other shows doesn't defend or reinforce a single one of the statements you've made. If anything, it weakens them by showing that you haven't come up with a way of defending them. Don't ruin yourself like that.
Breaking Bad has far more pure action than Mad Men or other similar shows, so it sure delivers the adrenaline in that respect. In fact, I don't see how anyone could say Mad Men is adrenaline-filled. I love the show, but not for spectacle or thrills. It's about becoming enveloped in several wonderful characters.
As for why it spurs on excitement when it unravels slowly (I'd argue it's pace isn't slow, just slower than most broadcast dramas), it's because the slow burn is tense and hair-raising. Excellent microcosm of this is an episode you haven't reached yet called Box Cutter.
Your argument about bias is, frankly, bullshit. While your distaste for "handegg" is original and hilarious and unique and sets you apart (I barely enjoy football by the way), it has nothing to do with liking Friday Night Lights. FNL isn't about football. It's about discrimination, teenage romance, finding fulfillment as an adult, dealing with dueling attachment to and distaste for your hometown. It's a universally relatable experience that happens to involve football. You are repeatedly confusing premise with what actually matters: theme and message.What I meant by universally good is that it can be enjoyed by anyone who isn't biased against it.
Let's take your avatar as the perfect example of my point: not matter how good Friday Night Lights may be, I'll never enjoy it, as I hate handegg and the whole north american high school culture... I'm biased against it, therefore I'll never be able to enjoy it to it's full potential. What I mean by universally good in this picture is something which can be enjoyed by anyone who isn't biased against it because of any particular factor.
As for the writing, It's funny, I agree about Walt, because like I've already said, Walt is the redeeming grace of the show, character-wise.
However, the symbolism, however is as forced as it comes, from what I've seen. You don't think the whole plane crash thing was forced?
And Jesse is a scarecrow for them to dump anything at. Expertly developed? You should watch more stuff.
It's not an observation, it's illogical bull. How in the hell would you know that EVERYONE is lying to themselves? Jesus, I don't think you understand what the words "subjectivity" or "universally" actually mean.It wasn't supposed to be an argument. It was an observation, pure and simple. Assuming we're refering to the same statement, at least... oO
Also, I'm not trying to compare Mad Men and BB (far from it), my only point is that given that BB is not over-the-top in nature (which usually translates in big followings, like Lost, for example), and that the adrenalin that it supplies is most likely not the reason behind all the love, I don't understand why people aren't raving about any of the other competently written shows on the air right now. It's boggling my mind.
In short: why is BB being singled out?
Your argument about bias is, frankly, bullshit. While your distaste for "handegg" is original and hilarious and unique and sets you apart (I barely enjoy football by the way), it has nothing to do with liking Friday Night Lights. FNL isn't about football. It's about discrimination, teenage romance, finding fulfillment as an adult, dealing with dueling attachment to and distaste for your hometown. It's a universally relatable experience that happens to involve football. You are repeatedly confusing premise with what actually matters: theme and message.
The plane crash was forced and could likely be agreed upon as being a misstep by nearly everyone in this topic. The intent was good (Walt's decisions are continuing to have a larger and larger negative impact on others), but the execution was lacking. You're ignoring symbolism like Walt's color transformation and dozens upon dozens of other small touches that reveal layers to the characters.
Again, you didn't bring up any examples as to why Jesse is a shallow character. You only said I should watch more stuff, which is arrogant vapid unintelligent horseshit. Even if Breaking Bad was the only show I'd seen (it certainly isn't), the fact that I've actually presented examples showing arcs the character has followed and elements of his persona that they've revealed beats your constant and meaningless assertions that everyone knows less than you and is lying to themselves. Maybe quit your asshattery and circlejerk over at r/atheism?
It's not an observation, it's illogical bull. How in the hell would you know that EVERYONE is lying to themselves? Jesus, I don't think you understand what the words "subjectivity" or "universally" actually mean.
Breaking Bad has done a good job of maintaining internal logic, but it's most certainly exaggerated and dramatic (or over-the-top, as you put it). Think about the premise of the show: it's a squandered-genius scientist cooking methamphetamine because he has cancer and wants to make sure his son who has CP and his pregnant wife are taken care of. At the same time, his brother-in-law is a top anti-drug agent and his former student is a naive addict. Is it high-concept sci-fi like Lost? No, but that doesn't mean it's not fantastical. It combines ideas that are at the center of social consciousness at the moment: the war on drugs and the rise of meth, cancer, etc. How does that not grab surface attention? All of that, of course, ignores that it's also a strong character study, which has always drawn attention.
Also, you can multi-quote posts or edit your posts to avoid double-posting.
- Indiewire Video: The story of BREAKING BAD, as told by its opening scenes
There is not a universal good. And you haven't provided an argument as to why there is. Again, your whole thing about bias doesn't make a lick of sense. I know people who despise football and don't know the rules to the game. They love the show. Because theme is what's most important, premise can't stop enjoyment. I haven't seen the Decalogue yet, though I'm a huge fan of what I've seen of Kieslowski already. Red could enter my pantheon of favorite all-time films after a few move viewings. But saying it's exempt from criticism is patently false. It's an opinion.The only thing I've said is that THERE IS such a thing as universal good. Look at Dekalog, for example, it's completely beyond any type of criticism. The only reason anyone wouldn't be able to enjoy it is if they add any type of bias against it. The whole reason behind me giving FNL and myself as an example is exactly that... I know it's supposed to be a good show, I do! But the setting makes me biased against it. US high-school culture makes me sick. It's like watching german movies made under the nazi regime... some of them have incredible themes and messages, but the whole propaganda setting turns me off and renders me unable to enjoy them. Same with my grandma and The Wire, for example... or my father and Game of thrones (he hates fantasy).
Repetitive =/= shallow. The character having shown up in fiction before doesn't simply make them underdeveloped. Even being predictable doesn't make a character shallow. Example: Vic Mackey in The Shield. Well-worn antihero archetype. Yet he's one of the most involving characters on television.You want to know why Jesse is a shallow character? Because he's been around since Dostoyevsky started writing, he's the cathartic ne'er do well but well intentioned lost soul. He's been in every movie, book and tv show ever involving the theme of recovery. I mean, the second he shows up in the first episode you know he's going to be a constant source of disappointment who eventually comes through and owns up to the situation. And that's true for every other character on the show other than Walt, they're one dimentional, all of them.
Because it is arrogant. Asserting that one can only have a certain opinion because they're less experienced or knowledgable than you is arrogant. By definition. This, unlike the quality of a TV show, cannot be argued. I went apeshit because that kind of arrogance, that kind of "oh my god you haven't seen ___! you suck!" sentiment is far too prevalent today. It's infuriating and wrong. Telling someone they need to see a piece of drama because you think they'd enjoy it is collaborative, kind, and constructive. Telling someone they need to see the things you've seen because without doing so they are inferior is insufferable. I insult the insufferable. I'm human.And once again, I'm amazed at how low people stoop when defending their egos. Everyone knows less than me? oO Where the hell did that come from? I can't disagree without being an arrogant troll, is that it?
God damn it, here I am trying to have a proper discussion and you had to start insulting me.
The only thing I said about you was that if you can't see through the characters and their arcs, you need to watch more quality drama! And you go apeshit on me about how I'm arrogant. oO
What the hell... when did I even tell you to watch more tv shows? I said stuff. You know, anything within the medium? TV shows are the lowest form of drama (even though some are amazing, even the best fall short of a good film).
It sure comes off that way.Yes, because I'm actually saying everyone is in denial, it's not just an expression or anything. Everytime anyone says "let's be honest" he's automatically arguing that everyone who disagrees is in denial.
And that's fine. That's an opinion that makes sense. It's not one that I agree with, and it's not the one I have, but it's one I entirely comprehend. But you need to stop claiming it as fact. Don't do that with any of your opinions. It undermines the entire purpose of academic critical discussion.In the end, it seems we agree. Everything you said about BB in the end there I agree with, all I'm saying is that while it's a good show, it's not the second coming of christ everyone makes it out to be. It's a clear case of don't believe the hype. Good premise, good main charcter. Everything else is decent, but not OH MY GOD AMAZING SAUCE ME NOW as it seems everyone's bent on making it seem.
Excuse the pedantic bullshit.
we already went over that some pages ago, conclusion was that it was too awkward and cheesy to be real.Supposed script for Season 5 premiere has been 'leaked', could of course be fake, but I don't want to read it so I can't really help with that...
Season 5 Episode 1 Alleged Leaked Script
- Indiewire Video: The story of BREAKING BAD, as told by its opening scenes
finally finished season 4 and holy shit! Best season finale I have ever seen.