Those groups do not have mass murder and genocide justified in their creed or ideology, unlike ISIS and AQ, an ideology that they inherited from the Saudis, an ideology of hate and sectarianism that is being taught in schools across the kingdom which makes it a breeding ground for ISIS and AQ wannabee terrorists.
Those Shia groups are as much terrorists as the US and Western governments with their targeted killings via drones, indiscriminate bombardment and clandestine activities.
Lol murdering Sunni civilians during the Maliki years, crimes against civilians in Syria, Sunni civilians at that. Remember the acts by the army of the Shia cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, the Mahdi Army that engaged in operating death squads against Sunni civilians during the Iraq war?
Shia groups are responsible for awful acts in many theatres, in many countries. Iran backed Assad and he killed many a Sunni civilian. Whether idealogical or not makes no difference, hate is hate.
one of those shia groups literally has "Death to America" on their flag. Shia terrorists have done their share of mass murder, so has Iran backed Bashar Al-Assad.
And that article about the textbooks is extremely incorrect.
Or the invasion of a country based on lies, or intentionally destroying the infrastructure and water supply of that country almost a decade earlier, or placing sanctions as a collective punishment killing half a million children and saying it was worth it in that country, or supporting the very same regime they removed fro mthat country to come to power, resulting in the deaths of several thousands people or....
that's only one country.
Those groups do not have mass murder and genocide justified in their creed or ideology, unlike ISIS and AQ, an ideology that they inherited from the Saudis, an ideology of hate and sectarianism that is being taught in schools across the kingdom which makes it a breeding ground for ISIS and AQ wannabee terrorists.
Those Shia groups are as much terrorists as the US and Western governments with their targeted killings via drones, indiscriminate bombardment and clandestine activities.
Hezbollah has bombed/murdered random Jewish civilians in countries nowhere near the Middle East. Are you accusing the US military of intentionally bombing random Muslim civilians throughout the world just for being Muslim?
Israel has had the support of the West forever and they continue to fuck shit up and prevent any possibility of peace with Palestine. Telling them to jog on when the rest of the world has a once in a lifetime opportunity is the absolutely correct thing to do
The US is like the only country that backs Israel in any capability what do you think will happen if the only country that backs them goes away? They say " I'm sorry guys I guess you were right " ? They do whatever they fuck they want, that else they got to lose at that point. Seriously, some of people don't think we shouldn't be isolating some countries at all thinking that if they are opened up they become just like us westerners eventually . But somehow doing the same to Israel and SA is somehow a good idea.
Hezbollah has bombed/murdered random Jewish civilians in countries nowhere near the Middle East. Are you accusing the US military of intentionally bombing random Muslim civilians throughout the world just for being Muslim?
I'm sure the CIA has done very shady things, although I still don't know about blowing up random Muslims in unrelated countries.
The US isn't isolating Israel or SA, it's negotiating and trying to make peace with Iran.
If they don't like what the US is doing that is their issue, if Israel want's to act like a child and continue to lie then they can do that, but they know that without US navy support they have zero chance against doing any military operation against Iran.
CIA has bombed a group of people before, I think trying to kill a leader that was part of a group that killed a bunch of marines in, but they pretty much fucked up and got a lot of innocent people killed and the guy they was targeting wasn't even the right target. After that CIA wasn't allowed to assassinate national leaders are something like that.
I didn't say that the US hasn't killed civilians, I said that they haven't intentionally targeted groups of random civilians just for being a certain religion like Hezbollah has.
I didn't say that the US hasn't killed civilians, I said that they haven't intentionally targeted groups of random civilians just for being a certain religion like Hezbollah has.
Which only happened because Saudi executed Nimr Al-Nimr for no sane reason.Wasn't that due to the embassy kerfuffle?
If there was ever a country worth turning your back on, Israel is one of them.
Single greatest factor in the destabilisation of the Middle East and propagators of a slow destruction of a people and their land.
1985 Bir Al Abed Beirut bombing, car bomb authorized by the CIA in retaliation to the Beirut marines barracks bombing.
More money to fund terrorism. Yay!
State Sponsors of Terrorism Overview:
http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2014/239410.htm
http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/up...ial-Support-to-Terrorists-and-Militants-1.pdf
Good for the people of Iran, bad for the middle east.
Which wasn't meant to intentionally kill civilians. It was an assassination attempt against Muhammad Hussein Fadl-Allāh.
Still sucks obvs and is an absolutely shitty thing, but not intentional. TBH the best example one could use would be the theoretical faux masssacre plan the CIA planned to execute on American Soil to try and justify an invasion of Cuba. That was some scary stuff.
On that note, Super happy that the Iranian people now have vastly improved chances to really shine out. Wishing them the best.
Yeah sure, not intentional. Any other murder you want to polish up so we can make it seem that only brown people can kill intentionally while the progressive free civilized West never does it?
If you actually bothered to check, you would have seen it's a pdf of a report done by the US Congressional Research Service for a US senator and not a article by anyone on that site.Freebeacon is a conservative rag.
Iran is still on the state sponsors of terrorism list and still face sanctions due to that fact.More money to fund terrorism. Yay!
State Sponsors of Terrorism Overview:
http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2014/239410.htm
http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/up...ial-Support-to-Terrorists-and-Militants-1.pdf
Good for the people of Iran, bad for the middle east.
so saudi arabia admitted to 9/11. thats new to me!
srsly, since when is nationality important when in comes to terrorist groups.
Lets hope they use some of that money to fuck with Saudi Arabia.
$10/barrel oil, here we come
Pardon my ignorance, but is it true that Iranians are not necessarily as fundamentalist as their theocratic government and more moderate in general? Or is there more of a mix where there are very religious segments of society that contrast with more moderate people?
I had a Iranian university tutor who said a lot of Iranian women don't really care to wear the Hijab and only do so because it is enforced in Iran. i.e. they won't wear the Hijab if they are in Western country. I can't remember if she was talking anecdotally though.
Exactly what we need, more tensions in the Middle East.
Just saw that Hillary Clinton is calling for new sanctions on Iran. lol
Good. I hope this accelerates the undoing of the cultural regression caused by 1979.
It's mixed about everything.Pardon my ignorance, but is it true that Iranians are not necessarily as fundamentalist as their theocratic government and more moderate in general? Or is there more of a mix where there are very religious segments of society that contrast with more moderate people?
I had a Iranian university tutor who said a lot of Iranian women don't really care to wear the Hijab and only do so because it is enforced in Iran. i.e. they won't wear the Hijab if they are in Western country. I can't remember if she was talking anecdotally though.
Just saw that Hillary Clinton is calling for new sanctions on Iran. lol
Pardon my ignorance, but is it true that Iranians are not necessarily as fundamentalist as their theocratic government and more moderate in general? Or is there more of a mix where there are very religious segments of society that contrast with more moderate people?
I had a Iranian university tutor who said a lot of Iranian women don't really care to wear the Hijab and only do so because it is enforced in Iran. i.e. they won't wear the Hijab if they are in Western country. I can't remember if she was talking anecdotally though.
Yeah, from my own experience, no Iranians (although no asylum seekers) I've ever encountered wore the hijab. Also, one of them drank Whisky as their first alcoholic drink and was fine to her, lol.I work with asyl seekers. I know some Iranian women and girls, I've never seen them wearing the hijab. Almost all Syrian women I know wear the hijab.
That's great to see diplomacy actually work, good on the Iranian regime.
And they've just announced they would buy 114 planes from Airbus, back to business already.
More education, a more diverse economy, and a larger young population as well as a large pro Western diaspora that travels back and forth regularly.Good on the Iranian regime? For doing what? Saudi Arabia has stayed a repressive fundamentalist country without sanctions, I fail to see why Iran should be any different.
Did she say why? I'd say the situation with the captured soldiers and prisoner transfer were both amicable enough.
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/266173-clinton-calls-for-new-sanctions-on-iranIran is still violating UN Security Council resolutions with its ballistic missile program, which should be met with new sanctions designations and firm resolve, she said.
These prisoners were held unjustly by a regime that continues to threaten the peace and security of the Middle East, Clinton added. Another American, Bob Levinson, still isnt home with his family.
Clinton said, as president, her policy toward Iran would be to distrust and verify.
The former secretary of State said the U.S. should not thank Iran for releasing prisoners unjustly held or for following through on its obligations.
The treatment of our Navy sailors earlier this week was offensive, including the release of demeaning and provocative videos, she added, referring to the brief capture of 10 sailors who inadvertently crossed into Iranian waters.
More education, a more diverse economy, and a larger young population as well as a large pro Western diaspora that travels back and forth regularly.
The world's youngest population and a focus on higher education counts for a heck of a lot. Plus the country has more relative freedom than Saudi to boot. That's why they can elect presidents as diverse as Rouhani and Ahmedinijad. That counts for a lot too.Still won't make much difference to how the country is run. Iran will remain a repressive fundamentalist country.
Well I guess this means oil prices will stay fucked for a while then.