Support NeoGAF

[LOLCats]

Totally got BJ from my friends babysitter when i was like 12, then again with a different babysitter, but same friend when i was like 14. The babysitters were for his younger sisters. Now that i think about it, that seems weird, but i wasnt and aint complaining. Good memories.

 

[Musky_Cheese]

Oh well if he was constantly gunning for her then that's a completely different story. Still i honestly don't remember any teacher in high school i found attractive enough to bang.

You poor thing.

I had a bunch. Hell I went to a class for a week instead of study hall because Mrs Poore was fine af. Sad she realized I wasn’t supposed to be there.

Also I had a counselor who was also the cheerleading coach who was a former NFL cheerleader

 

[SLoWMoTIoN]

Totally got BJ from my friends babysitter when i was like 12, then again with a different babysitter, but same friend when i was like 14. The babysitters were for his younger sisters. Now that i think about it, that seems weird, but i wasnt and aint complaining. Good memories.

How old were the sisters?

 

[Insane Metal]

I'm glad she was locked for that time. Sexual predators are the worst. Taking advantage of poor helpless teenage boys.

I know this because I always knew this was wrong and never ever felt like banging my hot teachers. Nope.

 

[Papa]

That fact people are ok with is saddening. Same reason a woman can cause a man to kill himself and people will defend her. Disgusting.

Then congratulations, you're both part of the problem and i hope your houses burn down(With no one in them obviously)

I think the harm caused by an attractive woman like the teacher in the OP having sex with a male student is less than if the genders were reversed. For that reason, I support the punishment being less, because in my mind the crime is less due to the reduced harm. I think most red-blooded males who had an attractive teacher understand this. This doesn't mean that women can't commit rape -- they quite obviously can -- but to me, this is a lesser form of rape than if, say, she had plied him with alcohol and forced herself onto him. In that case she would be the predator. In this case, she wasn't outright predatory, but she was the authority figure and the onus was on her to take control and shut it down. She didn't, so she deserved jail time, but not to the same extent as a violent sexual predator.

Where we run into problems is when we try to equalise social structures based on gender because men and women are inherently unequal. I don't buy into the current_year dogma that men and women are equal across all parameters. There are all kinds of quid pro quos built in to our social structures based on the very basic evolutionary fact that women are more sexually valuable than men. Women receive various social benefits because they are the weaker sex and cases like this highlight that. If feminists truly wanted equality, they would first campaign for women to give up their social benefits before demanding to receive male benefits. But they don't. They invented the patriarchy conspiracy theory to justify taking all the good shit from being a man with none of the bad shit, while simultaneously giving up none of the good shit of being a woman.

 

[lock2k]

That's considered attractive?

DERP

 

[SLoWMoTIoN]

I think the harm caused by an attractive woman like the teacher in the OP having sex with a male student is less than if the genders were reversed. For that reason, I support the punishment being less, because in my mind the crime is less due to the reduced harm. I think most red-blooded males who had an attractive teacher understand this. This doesn't mean that women can't commit rape -- they quite obviously can -- but to me, this is a lesser form of rape than if, say, she had plied him with alcohol and forced herself onto him. In that case she would be the predator. In this case, she wasn't outright predatory, but she was the authority figure and the onus was on her to take control and shut it down. She didn't, so she deserved jail time, but not to the same extent as a violent sexual predator.

Where we run into problems is when we try to equalise social structures based on gender because men and women are inherently unequal. I don't buy into the current_year dogma that men and women are equal across all parameters. There are all kinds of quid pro quos built in to our social structures based on the very basic evolutionary fact that women are more sexually valuable than men. Women receive various social benefits because they are the weaker sex and cases like this highlight that. If feminists truly wanted equality, they would first campaign for women to give up their social benefits before demanding to receive male benefits. But they don't. They invented the patriarchy conspiracy theory to justify taking all the good shit from being a man with none of the bad shit, while simultaneously giving up none of the good shit of being a woman.

Just because they ARE weaker doesn't mean they don't have to serve time for the crime the same way a man has to. Or even have less social stigma attached to them.

 

[Tesseract]

Just because they ARE weaker doesn't mean they don't have to serve time for the crime the same way a man has to. Or even have less social stigma attached to them.

we have different degrees of punishment for various crimes and ages and in many cases genders

men and women are different, we don't fuck the same way

 

[lock2k]

The double standards when it comes to these situations is absurd. These pedophiles should be locked up for a lot longer, but since they are female and attractive it somehow makes it okay for them to prey on kids.


Its ridiculous.

As much as I'm guilty of laughing at the jokes (because I love crude humor) this is a subject I actually agree with you.

 

[Tesseract]

why would a hot female teacher who bangs a horny boy not be held to a different standard

it's free pizza

YOU FUCKED ME

YOU SUCKED MY DICK

 

[Mallic]

I think the harm caused by an attractive woman like the teacher in the OP having sex with a male student is less than if the genders were reversed. For that reason, I support the punishment being less, because in my mind the crime is less due to the reduced harm. I think most red-blooded males who had an attractive teacher understand this. This doesn't mean that women can't commit rape -- they quite obviously can -- but to me, this is a lesser form of rape than if, say, she had plied him with alcohol and forced herself onto him. In that case she would be the predator. In this case, she wasn't outright predatory, but she was the authority figure and the onus was on her to take control and shut it down. She didn't, so she deserved jail time, but not to the same extent as a violent sexual predator.

Where we run into problems is when we try to equalise social structures based on gender because men and women are inherently unequal. I don't buy into the current_year dogma that men and women are equal across all parameters. There are all kinds of quid pro quos built in to our social structures based on the very basic evolutionary fact that women are more sexually valuable than men. Women receive various social benefits because they are the weaker sex and cases like this highlight that. If feminists truly wanted equality, they would first campaign for women to give up their social benefits before demanding to receive male benefits. But they don't. They invented the patriarchy conspiracy theory to justify taking all the good shit from being a man with none of the bad shit, while simultaneously giving up none of the good shit of being a woman.

This is probably why there are so many more MtF trans people as oppose to the other way around. Because to be quite honest.

Being a man sucks these days and isn't worth the effort. Why should i have to go through all this trouble, while a woman gets to play life on easy mode just for the fact that she exists? I'm all for a woman who actually wants equality and is willing to accept all the good and bad that comes with it (And yes they do exist).

But even if everything you say is true, i got better things to do with my life then play glorified babysitter to a weak willed, agentless, pampered princess, who wouldn't know hardship if it knocked her upside the head with a sledgehammer.

And yes i will admit i'm rather bitter, because it feels like i'm expected to still bear all the burdens and responsibilities of being a traditional man while getting nothing in return. So what's the point? My being a man should not be an excuse for women to be emotional wrecks. I consider myself an egalitarian, because i'm not gonna spend the better half of my life carting around dead weight. You want a free ride? Find a sugar daddy or look into becoming an escort, i'm not interested.

 

[Tesseract]

there's plenty of independent women out there

equality of opportunity has already been established

 

[Mallic]

we have different degrees of punishment for various crimes and ages and in many cases genders

men and women are different, we don't fuck the same way

Why are you so adamant about defending this? You know it's to your detriment right? What do you get out of putting yourself as inferior and more expendable to women?

 

[SLoWMoTIoN]

we have different degrees of punishment for various crimes and ages and in many cases genders

men and women are different, we don't fuck the same way

I aim to demolish all that bs. A 15 year old kid that murdered a 60 year old lady needs the death penalty.
Vote for Krang

Why are you so adamant about defending this? You know it's to your detriment right? What do you get out of putting yourself as inferior and more expendable to women?

Wrong. He is saying he is SO MUCH BETTER than women so they should get an easier pass.

 

[brap]

why would a hot female teacher who bangs a horny boy not be held to a different standard

it's free pizza

YOU FUCKED ME

YOU SUCKED MY DICK

YOU BOTH FUCKIN SUCKED MY COCK
required viewing for everybody in here

 

[Tesseract]

Why are you so adamant about defending this? You know it's to your detriment right? What do you get out of putting yourself as inferior and more expendable to women?

how is it to my detriment, it's a fucking biological and psychological fact of life that women are more valuable

men are cum factories, warriors, protectors, hunters, so on

i don't consider myself inferior and expendable to women

 

[Mallic]

I aim to demolish all that bs. A 15 year old kid that murdered a 60 year old lady needs the death penalty.
Vote for Krang


Wrong. He is saying he is SO MUCH BETTER than women so they should get an easier pass.

Oh that is a load of bullshit, so men are a little stronger physically, whoopee freaking do. Give it 20 years and robots will do most of the manual labor. This is my biggest issue with western civilization, it puts way too much value on the strength of ones arms and acts like physical strength is the only indicator of superiority.

 

[Silent Duck]

it's impossible for a woman to rape me

Hmmmm.... I don’t know about that.
These two might want try to prove you wrong.

Powers: Crushing weight of it’s formless mass

Powers: the powers of Grayskull

 

[Tesseract]

Oh that is a load of bullshit, so men are a little stronger physically, whoopee freaking do. Give it 20 years and robots will do most of the manual labor. This is my biggest issue with western civilization, it puts way too much value on the strength of ones arms and acts like physical strength is the only indicator of superiority.

men are a lot stronger physically, have faster reaction times, are less agreeable by nature, more assertive, aggressive, dominant

you seem to want the world one way, when it's another

 

[SLoWMoTIoN]

how is it to my detriment, it's a fucking biological and psychological fact of life that women are more valuable

men are cum factories, warriors, protectors, hunters, so on

i don't consider myself inferior and expendable to women

That is just your COOM brain talking.

 

[Mallic]

how is it to my detriment, it's a fucking biological and psychological fact of life that women are more valuable

men are cum factories, warriors, protectors, hunters, so on

i don't consider myself inferior and expendable to women

And you're ok with that? You're fine being viewed as nothing more then a sperm donor, an atm machine and a meat shield? And all for what? Some empty words of praise before being abandoned after you've lost your worth? Being macho does no one good dead.

 

[Tesseract]

And you're ok with that? You're fine being viewed as nothing more then a sperm donor, an atm machine and a meat shield? And all for what? Some empty words of praise before being abandoned after you've lost your worth? Being macho does no one good dead.

yes, i'm okay with busting massive loads, handling the finances, and being the protector

the rest i dunno what to say to, doth protest much

 

[SLoWMoTIoN]

This is probably why there are so many more MtF trans people as oppose to the other way around. Because to be quite honest.

Being a man sucks these days and isn't worth the effort. Why should i have to go through all this trouble, while a woman gets to play life on easy mode just for the fact that she exists? I'm all for a woman who actually wants equality and is willing to accept all the good and bad that comes with it (And yes they do exist).

But even if everything you say is true, i got better things to do with my life then play glorified babysitter to a weak willed, agentless, pampered princess, who wouldn't know hardship if it knocked her upside the head with a sledgehammer.

And yes i will admit i'm rather bitter, because it feels like i'm expected to still bear all the burdens and responsibilities of being a traditional man while getting nothing in return. So what's the point? My being a man should not be an excuse for women to be emotional wrecks. I consider myself an egalitarian, because i'm not gonna spend the better half of my life carting around dead weight. You want a free ride? Find a sugar daddy or look into becoming an escort, i'm not interested.

MGTOW member?

 

[Papa]

This is probably why there are so many more MtF trans people as oppose to the other way around. Because to be quite honest.

Being a man sucks these days and isn't worth the effort. Why should i have to go through all this trouble, while a woman gets to play life on easy mode just for the fact that she exists? I'm all for a woman who actually wants equality and is willing to accept all the good and bad that comes with it (And yes they do exist).

But even if everything you say is true, i got better things to do with my life then play glorified babysitter to a weak willed, agentless, pampered princess, who wouldn't know hardship if it knocked her upside the head with a sledgehammer.

And yes i will admit i'm rather bitter, because it feels like i'm expected to still bear all the burdens and responsibilities of being a traditional man while getting nothing in return. So what's the point? My being a man should not be an excuse for women to be emotional wrecks. I consider myself an egalitarian, because i'm not gonna spend the better half of my life carting around dead weight. You want a free ride? Find a sugar daddy or look into becoming an escort, i'm not interested.

1. Reject feminism. It is a political movement designed to invert social order. "Equality" is the PR front, but it is a lie.

2. Embrace traditional masculinity (stoicism, responsibility, self-sacrifice, competition, confronting and overcoming risk).

3. Put yourself first and work on the things that good women are attracted to (in order of importance: your sense of humour, your career, and your physical appearance).

4. Don't be tempted by the incel/MGTOW/Men's Rights mind poison.

Do these things and the good women will come to you. You won't have to bear the burdens, just reap the rewards. The good women are still out there, and they are plentiful, but they aren't as loud as the feminists. That's part of what makes them good women.

Also, I somewhat agree with you on the MTF point. I see it as a way for weak males at the bottom of the masculine social hierarchy to opt out of the difficult transition to manhood. I made a thread about it earlier in the year: https://www.neogaf.com/threads/not-another-trans-thread.1478260/.

 

[Mallic]

yes, i'm okay with busting massive loads, handling the finances, and being the protector

the rest i dunno what to say to, doth protest much

Honestly it sounds more like you just want validation, do you really truly feel fulfilled being the big macho man or are you just hiding some deep seated insecurity by posturing about how manly you are? Personally we live in a time where being the sole provider simply is not practical anymore, both parties need to contribute to some degree for income to remain stable.

I would honestly feel betrayed if i went out of the way to be the protector, only for things to go bad and the person i was protecting effectively leaving me to die just to save herself. I want someone i can fight alongside not simply fight for, if a woman wouldn't be willing to risk her life for mine regardless of the gap in strength, then it was a one sided relationship anyway.

As for the sex, honestly there are so many different outlets that i can afford to demand a woman be more then a pretty face and good in the sack to be worth my time.

 

[Papa]

Just because they ARE weaker doesn't mean they don't have to serve time for the crime the same way a man has to. Or even have less social stigma attached to them.

"She didn't, so she deserved jail time, but not to the same extent as a violent sexual predator."

Learn to read, burger boy. This crumbseeking is why you are confined to 2D anime tiddies.

 

[Mallic]

MGTOW member?

No im never going full mgtow, that's foolish to think all women are like that, its separating the hits from the misses that make it such a daunting endeavor.

 

[SLoWMoTIoN]

"She didn't, so she deserved jail time, but not to the same extent as a violent sexual predator."

Learn to read, burger boy. This crumbseeking is why you are confined to 2D anime tiddies.

Whatever I'm on to you male feminist...

 

[Mallic]

"She didn't, so she deserved jail time, but not to the same extent as a violent sexual predator."

Learn to read, burger boy. This crumbseeking is why you are confined to 2D anime tiddies.

Ok look at it this way, if we had this exact same scenario, underage person comes on to the teacher, but this time it was a female student and a male teacher. Would you be anywhere near this dismissive about this?

 

[Tesseract]

all relationships are transactional, welcome to reality

Honestly it sounds more like you just want validation, do you really truly feel fulfilled being the big macho man or are you just hiding some deep seated insecurity by posturing about how manly you are? Personally we live in a time where being the sole provider simply is not practical anymore, both parties need to contribute to some degree for income to remain stable.

I would honestly feel betrayed if i went out of the way to be the protector, only for things to go bad and the person i was protecting effectively leaving me to die just to save herself. I want someone i can fight alongside not simply fight for, if a woman wouldn't be willing to risk her life for mine regardless of the gap in strength, then it was a one sided relationship anyway.

As for the sex, honestly there are so many different outlets that i can afford to demand a woman be more then a pretty face and good in the sack to be worth my time.

i seek and want for nothing, and yes i feel immense satisfaction out of being the sole provider and protector

my girl can contribute if she wants, or she can focus on nurturing a family, taking care of the home, or merely frolicking around the house in her underwear

things go bad in life sometimes, you move on

 

[Papa]

Ok look at it this way, if we had this exact same scenario, underage person comes on to the teacher, but this time it was a female student and a male teacher. Would you be anywhere near this dismissive about this?

I'm not dismissive. In fact, I addressed it in my post that you clearly didn't read and/or understand.

We may not be pro-feminism here, but we ain't pro-MGTOW either. Both are bitch ass ideologies for bitch ass people.

 

[Mallic]

No im never going full mgtow, that's foolish to think all women are like that, its separating the hits from the misses that make it such a daunting endeavor.

all relationships are transactional, welcome to reality



i seek and want for nothing, and yes i feel immense satisfaction out of being the sole provider

my girl can contribute if she wants, or she can focus on nurturing a family

things go bad in life sometimes, you move on

Tch. Then you do you. I want someone i know i can lean on and trust that i will let her do the same.

I'm not dismissive. In fact, I addressed it in my post that you clearly didn't read and/or understand.

We may not be pro-feminism here, but we ain't pro-MGTOW either. Both are bitch ass ideologies for bitch ass people.

Then would you mind clarifying, because it honestly sounded like you were saying because she was a woman it somehow made it less bad or more ok then if it was a dude. That's what i got unless i misread something.

 

[Tesseract]

Tch. Then you do you. I want someone i know i can lean on and trust that i will let her do the same.

bruh i can lean and trust my girl in a time of need, she's not a fucking gold digger

they're not mutually exclusive concepts, maybe try dating some church girls as whatever lot you've thrown with seem like absolute skanks

 

[Papa]

Tch. Then you do you. I want someone i know i can lean on and trust that i will let her do the same.

We all do, but that requires them to respect you. If you choose to be weak and subservient, they won't respect you, and your relationship is doomed to fail anyway. Be strong, both mentally and physically, reject fragility, and women will respect you. Only then will you be able to lean on and trust them.

 

[Mallic]

bruh i can lean and trust my girl in a time of need, she's not a fucking gold digger

they're not mutually exclusive concepts, maybe try dating some church girls as whatever lot you've thrown with seem like absolute skanks

Let's just say I've seen the end result of a lot of bad relationships first hand. That's part of why i'm so picky.

 

[Tesseract]

We all do, but that requires them to respect you. If you choose to be weak and subservient, they won't respect you, and your relationship is doomed to fail anyway. Be strong, both mentally and physically, reject fragility, and women will respect you. Only then will you be able to lean on and trust them.

truth, you wanna be the strongest man in her life

 

[Papa]

No im never going full mgtow, that's foolish to think all women are like that, its separating the hits from the misses that make it such a daunting endeavor.

You're going at least partially MGTOW though.

 

[Mallic]

You're going at least partially MGTOW though.

Nothing wrong with keeping your guard up.

 

[Tesseract]

this is why i always warn people about the dangers of becoming a cum chump

 

[lock2k]

I'm not dismissive. In fact, I addressed it in my post that you clearly didn't read and/or understand.

We may not be pro-feminism here, but we ain't pro-MGTOW either. Both are bitch ass ideologies for bitch ass people.

Word!

 

[Papa]

Then would you mind clarifying, because it honestly sounded like you were saying because she was a woman it somehow made it less bad or more ok then if it was a dude. That's what i got unless i misread something.

If we are going all in on the equality comrade train, then yes it should be treated exactly the same as a male teacher penetrating a female student. But as I said, I reject the current_year dogma that men and women are equal across all parameters. I believe that the harm done by Ms. Altice is less than the gender-flipped version and I think the punishment should be less accordingly. That doesn't mean that I think it should be zero, but I also don't think she should be treated the same as a violent predatory rapist.

 

[Ownage]

Nice.

 

[DeepEnigma]

The reason why there is a double standard is because men remember what it was like to be a teenager and we all would have given our right nut to fuck a teacher....let alone a hot one!

This guy said he was constantly begging her for it as well so it's not like she preyed on this guy. I'm guessing that eventually she just couldn't resist his spicy young dick.

Jail seems harsh considering he was of legal age.
Anything over 16 and I think losing your job is fair and punishment enough.

When I was in high school, junior year 16-17 years old we had student teachers all the time that would come down from the colleges for the teaching credits.

One was the daughter of a teacher that taught there, and she was around 20 or 21, smoking hot.

All of us guys were trying to work it on her, savagely. She never gave in (this was the 90s too, different culture), but it was well known, that even the girls in the class would get jealous of that attention we gave her. Would get her blushing hard.

Irony in all of this, a few years after I was out of school her father was actually sleeping with a student which was a well known promiscuous girl. Don’t think it ended well for him.

 

[Mallic]

If we are going all in on the equality comrade train, then yes it should be treated exactly the same as a male teacher penetrating a female student. But as I said, I reject the current_year dogma that men and women are equal across all parameters. I believe that the harm done by Ms. Altice is less than the gender-flipped version and I think the punishment should be less accordingly. That doesn't mean that I think it should be zero, but I also don't think she should be treated the same as a violent predatory rapist.

I really do not agree with that not due to the end outcome i feel that due to the boy wanting it, the blow was softened some what. However my issue is that i am 99% certain that this same case would have been treated with much more severity had it been a man and i doubt it would even make it on the sex registry because there's a good chance the guy wouldn't even make it out of prison alive had the roles been reversed.

In my very humble opinion, just because men and women are different biologically, does not mean they should be treated differently under the eyes of the law. Being a woman should not get you a free pass in life.
This isn't out of some equality comrade ideology(Although that would be nice) but rather debunking this idea that women are somehow less dangerous and predatory then men are.

Personally i'm sick of this situation where a woman is trusted to be around kids and it turns out she's been sexually manipulating and abusing kids at her job for years, meanwhile I'm seen talking to a teenager in public and it's just assumed i'm some pedophilic rapist. Maybe men and women aren't equal, but that shouldn't lead to women aren't potentially dangerous.

Society greatly underestimates the woman in multiple degrees and women abuse this societal conception to high heaven, and i wanna change that.

 

[Papa]

I really do not agree with that not due to the end outcome i feel that due to the boy wanting it, the blow was softened some what. However my issue is that i am 99% certain that this same case would have been treated with much more severity had it been a man and i doubt it would even make it on the sex registry because there's a good chance the guy wouldn't even make it out of prison alive had the roles been reversed.

Yeah, because you're on the equality comrade train. I'm not.

In my very humble opinion,

Stop this bitch ass shit. Self-deprecation != self-denigration. You have an opinion. I don't agree with it. It's cool.

just because men and women are different biologically, does not mean they should be treated differently under the eyes of the law. Being a woman should not get you a free pass in life.
This isn't out of some equality comrade ideology(Although that would be nice) but rather debunking this idea that women are somehow less dangerous and predatory then men are.

Personally i'm sick of this situation where a woman is trusted to be around kids and it turns out she's been sexually manipulating and abusing kids at her job for years, meanwhile I'm seen talking to a teenager in public and it's just assumed i'm some pedophilic rapist. Maybe men and women aren't equal, but that shouldn't lead to women aren't potentially dangerous.

Society greatly underestimates the woman in multiple degrees and women abuse this societal conception to high heaven, and i wanna change that.

It all comes back to the quid pro quos that were evolved in our social structures over millennia. If they hadn't been eroded over the last several decades, we wouldn't be in this mess.

 

[Punished Miku]

all relationships are transactional, welcome to reality



i seek and want for nothing, and yes i feel immense satisfaction out of being the sole provider and protector

my girl can contribute if she wants, or she can focus on nurturing a family, taking care of the home, or merely frolicking around the house in her underwear

things go bad in life sometimes, you move on

My girl and I both make good money and we split everything. Its spoiled the hell out of me. It's great. She buys expensive gifts too without much hassle. We can travel very easily.

 

[Papa]

My girl and I both make good money and we split everything. Its spoiled the hell out of me. It's great. She buys expensive gifts too without much hassle. We can travel very easily.

You're living the millennial dream, my friend. Me too (in the good non-hashtaggy way).

 

[Mallic]

Stop this bitch ass shit. Self-deprecation != self-denigration. You have an opinion. I don't agree with it. It's cool.

It's called condescension, look it up ya might learn something.

My girl and I both make good money and we split everything. Its spoiled the hell out of me. It's great. She buys expensive gifts too without much hassle. We can travel very easily.

See that's exactly what i hope to get.

 

[Papa]

It's called condescension, look it up ya might learn something.

Prefacing your opinions with "in my very humble opinion" is not condescension; it's just an attempt to soften and precondition the reader to be more receptive of an opinion that you yourself aren't confident in.

 

[Tesseract]

It's called condescension, look it up ya might learn something.


See that's exactly what i hope to get.

you do you dude, go get that if you want it

plenty of sea in the fish