• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Bush Administration to ISPs: Fork it over.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Macam

Banned
WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration asked a federal appeals court Friday to restore its ability to compel Internet service providers to turn over information about their customers or subscribers as part of its fight against terrorism.

The legal filing with the 2nd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in New York comes amid a debate in Congress over renewal of the Patriot Act and whether to expand the FBI's power to seek records without the approval of a judge or grand jury.

U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero of New York last year blocked the government from conducting secret searches of communications records, saying the law that authorized them wrongly barred legal challenges and imposed a gag order on affected businesses.

The ruling came in a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union and an internet access firm that received a national security letter from the FBI demanding records. The identity of the firm remains secret.

The government was authorized to pursue communications records as part of a 1986 law. Its powers were enhanced by the Patriot Act in 2001.

The administration said the judge's ruling was off the mark because the company did mount a legal challenge to the demand for records. "Yet in this very case, the recipient of the national security letter did precisely what the NSLs supposedly prevent recipients from doing," the filing said.

The law's ban on disclosing that such a letter has been received also is appropriate because of legitimate security concerns, the government said.

But ACLU attorney Jameel Jaffer said the law does not contain a provision to challenge the FBI's demand for documents. The ACLU and the firm filed the lawsuit to challenge the law's constitutionality on the grounds that it doesn't contain such a provision, he said.

"Most people who get NSLs don't know they can bring a challenge in court because the statute doesn't say they can," he said. "No one has filed a motion to quash in 20 years."

The ban on disclosure is so broad that the ACLU initially filed the suit under seal and negotiated for weeks on a version that could be released to the public.

Previously censored material released several months after Marrero's ruling included innocuous material the government wanted withheld, the ACLU said, including the phrase "national security" and this sentence from a statement by an FBI agent: "I am a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation."

Source: http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,67674,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_7
 
hitler.jpg


Freedom's on the move!
 

Blackace

if you see me in a fight with a bear, don't help me fool, help the bear!
ManaByte said:
Wow Hitler as the first reply. Is that a record?

no it would have been better if it was in the thread starter's post... but really who else to compare this crap to?
 
Blackace said:
Yeah! He is a good one... but the pictures aren't as powerful...
You could just use Bush's face.

So what exactly does the Bush administration want? The websites that the customers visit? Or the information (forum comments, private livejournal entries, etc) that goes through the ISP?
 

Link

The Autumn Wind
The government was authorized to pursue communications records as part of a 1986 law. Its powers were enhanced by the Patriot Act in 2001.
Damn the Patriots!
 

goodcow

Member
Hammy said:
You could just use Bush's face.

So what exactly does the Bush administration want? The websites that the customers visit? Or the information (forum comments, private livejournal entries, etc) that goes through the ISP?

FUCK YOU BUSH, YOU CUNT.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom