"THE West Australian Opposition has joined calls for a ban on a violent video game blamed for the murder of a 14-year-old boy in England. Manhunt, which depicts bloody and graphic murder scenes, is already banned in New Zealand but remains on Australian shelves with an MA15+ rating.
State Opposition Leader Colin Barnett said the interactive game, which features gruesome scenes including a beheading and suffocations and blood-filled slayings, rewarded players as young as 15 for increasing levels of violence.Mr Barnett called on video stores to voluntarily withdraw the game, saying the brutal images could desensitise young people to violence.
"When I watched this game, I was absolutely horrified. It's not a video game that I would want any children to be exposed to," he said.
Mr Barnett said a national approach to classifications was preferable, but the Manhunt game highlighted the need for Western Australia to restore its independent censorship powers as a fallback to allow it to respond to community concerns.
Ms Scott said the Australian Family Association and Young Media Australia also wanted the game banned. She said the Opposition supported the introduction of stricter R and X classifications for video games, which currently only apply to films.
A spokesman for federal Attorney-General Philip Ruddock said game ratings were a matter for the Office of Film and Literature Classification. He said the introduction of stricter ratings for video games needed to be addressed by state attorneys-general and would need uniform support.
National ratings were reviewed about 12 months ago."
http://news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,10454281%5E2761,00.html
It's hard enough already to deal with the overly harsh censorship laws on a national level, but to have state censorship laws reintroduced as a fallback on what the OFLC miss is just too much, well in my state at least. The OFLC ratings system needs a shake up, they definitely need to introduce stricter ratings, preferably an R18+ as we see in the movies.
At the the moment the highest game classification is MA15+ so if the OFLC board deems something unfit for that rating, it simply refuses classification (see ShellShock Nam '67) which means the developers have to modify/censor the game to meet the boards standards.
Basically pollies should be pushing for harder & stricter ratings, instead of looking for a quick "let's just pull everything we don't like off the shelves immediately" approach. So all those angsty teeny boppers who are thinking of murdering half their school with an ice pick don't get their greasy little hands on games that could potentially incite those murderous cravings.