This.Glass bottle > can > plastic bottle.
Fucks me why.
Glass bottle. I don't know why, but it always seems a little bit sweeter and a little bit crisper. Can't go wrong with the glass bottle.
Can it be a freshly squeezed lemonade instead?
Coke tastes like crap to me from any of those options.
Except for actual coke..nothing better than a near ice-cold can hitting your lips when you sip coke zero.
NOTHING.
Can it be a freshly squeezed lemonade instead?
Coke tastes like crap to me from any of those options.
Glass and plastic are equally good to store drinks (beer included). The with plastic is purely perception: it doesn't look as good as glass, nor does it get as cold, so we perceive the liquid inside to be warmer.
Both of this methods are great, because during the bottling process, the oxygen inside them can be almost completely taken out (we're talking over 99% oxygen free drinks after the bottles are sealed). The lack of oxygen inside helps prevent liquid oxidation, which makes everything taste funky (and it's also the reason why you should always poor your beer with a healthy foam head).
Cans are completely different. during the filling process they are top-less (they look like aluminium glasses). A top-less can is structurally weak, so the oxygen inside can't be properly taken out. This leads to slightly oxidized drinks, which are poorer in quality to those in either plastic or glass bottles. Some people claim canned drinks tend to taste slightly metallic, that's the oxidation right there. It's not like the aluminium is actually leaking its metallic taste.
So there you go. Plastic =glass >>>> can. An argument can be made about plastic, since it's safer (it doesn't shatter, it can't be used as a weapon, plastic is often allowed inside stadiums and other venues), but from a quality point of view, it's virtually indistinguishable from glass.
Glass and plastic are equally good to store drinks (beer included). The with plastic is purely perception: it doesn't look as good as glass, nor does it get as cold, so we perceive the liquid inside to be warmer.
Both of this methods are great, because during the bottling process, the oxygen inside them can be almost completely taken out (we're talking over 99% oxygen free drinks after the bottles are sealed). The lack of oxygen inside helps prevent liquid oxidation, which makes everything taste funky (and it's also the reason why you should always poor your beer with a healthy foam head).
Cans are completely different. during the filling process they are top-less (they look like aluminium glasses). A top-less can is structurally weak, so the oxygen inside can't be properly taken out. This leads to slightly oxidized drinks, which are poorer in quality to those in either plastic or glass bottles. Some people claim canned drinks tend to taste slightly metallic, that's the oxidation right there. It's not like the aluminium is actually leaking its metallic taste.
So there you go. Plastic =glass >>>> can. An argument can be made about plastic, since it's safer (it doesn't shatter, it can't be used as a weapon, plastic is often allowed inside stadiums and other venues), but from a quality point of view, it's virtually indistinguishable from glass.
Draft.
Then glass bottle, then can, then plastic.
Glass > Can > Plastic
Science.
Imagine you sitting on a hot summer day outside on your balcony enjoying the heat and sun. However after some time you decide to go inside to grab a drink, maybe an ice-cold cooke. In your fridge you have:
-A can of coke
-A 1L plastic bottle of coke.
-A 6-pack of coca-cola in glass bottles.
What do you decide to drink? And why?