golovkin ate all of canelo's punches like it was nothing.
Are you suggesting Canelo didn't do the same? There was no point in the fight where any of GGG's shots done any damage to Canelo. And he hit him with some powerful shots.
golovkin ate all of canelo's punches like it was nothing.
Are you suggesting Canelo didn't do the same? There was no point in the fight where any of GGG's shots done any damage to Canelo. And he hit him with some powerful shots.
Are you suggesting Canelo didn't do the same? There was no point in the fight where any of GGG's shots done any damage to Canelo. And he hit him with some powerful shots.
I think GGG was the aggressor the entire night, judges imo fucked up.. especially that 118-110 nonsense.
2) Golovkin's been demystified. Alvarez is his only A tier opponent and Golovkin couldn't beat him.
Haha, that's certainly one way to spin it.
He had no A tier opponents, that's hardly a spin. Jacobs was his best opponent and he ain't A level by any standard.
Alvarez was his first test for greatness and Golovkin failed.
He had no A tier opponents, that's hardly a spin. Jacobs was his best opponent and he ain't A level by any standard.
Alvarez was his first test for greatness and Golovkin failed.
So the second test for greatness that Canelo has failed?
I didn't think Golovkin had the endurance to go 12 against a young fighter like Canelo in this style of a fight. Not only did he have it but Canelo actually looked more tired than him for many of those rounds. Pretty crazy. At that age to just keep coming at him like that over and over again while throwing 700 punches. Relentless Kazakh conditioning.
*shrug* Mayweather is better. Golovkin about as good as Canelo at 160. Lara fight was close. Overall Canelo has a good resume and will go down as a very good, maybe great fighter when all is said and done. He is a P4P top 10 boxer at the moment and absolutely A tier. 160 is not his weight class and he withstood the contemporary champ. Last night's fight did not hurt Canelo's legacy because his 154 resume has some impressive depth and he was the slight underdog. Golovkin's legacy ain't so hot in comparison. In 20 years who'll go crazy over the guy whose best wins are Jacobs, Murray, Lemieux? Golovkin's career reminds me of Tyson's without getting upset by an underdog and without ever stepping up for the big fights. KOing second rate fighter spectacularly with an in-your-face style that's entertaining for most people.
Impressive resume lol Cotto and a gifted decision against Lara, oh he beat a 41 year old Mosley too lol.
LolNice salt. I thought the bitterness on the internet over a Canelo win would keep me up these nights, but a draw did the job too.
Canelo's best wins:
1. Cotto
2. Lara (controversial but about as much of a robbery as tonight's fight)
3. Trout
4. Chavez Jr.
5. Khan (or Kirkland, I don't know. I don't rate Kirkland)
That's a good resume. Golovkin's best wins? Jacobs, Lemieux, Geale, Murray, no idea, other than Jacobs his opponents are all kinda similar in terms of skill level.
Gifted decision? This is how you know someone doesn't respect the sport. Canelo fighting Lara has nothing to do with gifts. It was a risky fight, it was not a money fight, fight with only downsides in a sport that any fight can be your last is no gift. The fight was close but I disagree with your judgement that Canelo was gifted the decision, close yes, gifted? C'mon.Impressive resume lol Cotto and a gifted decision against Lara, oh he beat a 41 year old Mosley too lol.
I know mexicans are bias, but come on you guys can not seriously say that was a win or a draw for Canelo. All the media in Mexico is saying this fight was Canelo's and that there was nothing controversial about it, like WTF, how deluded can you be?
Remember, these people are the ones who also believe Mexico are contenders in every world cup.
Teddy went in.
Ok. But this isn't how boxing is scored.GGG made Canelo fight his fight through the last 8 rounds and that's why I give it to him.
I know mexicans are bias, but come on you guys can not seriously say that was a win or a draw for Canelo. All the media in Mexico is saying this fight was Canelo's and that there was nothing controversial about it, like WTF, how deluded can you be?
Remember, these people are the ones who also believe Mexico are contenders in every world cup.
Ok. But this isn't how boxing is scored.
Ok. But this isn't how boxing is scored.
I'm good with the draw; neither guy dominated, both had their moments, I would say that Canelo has more of those moments. He countered Golovkin with some great shots that probably would have dropped lesser fighters, and he shrugged off or slipped Golovkin's best stuff. He also did great bodywork, something that GGG is known for too but was sorely lacking in this fight. Everyone that I've spoken to that thought GGG won point to his aggressiveness, but I just don't think he took advantage of it.
Khan is shit, if he is in your top 5 wins it says something.
Had a chance to watch the a replay without any commentary and score the fight. When watching it live I thought it was close but would have given the edge to GGG.
Here is my score based off the replay -
1 - Golovkin
2 - Canelo
3 - Canelo
4 - Golovkin
5 - Golovkin
6 - Canelo
7 - Golovkin
8 - Canelo
9 - Canelo
10 - Golovkin
11 - Canelo
12 - Canelo
115 - 113 Canelo
Some of the rounds were close, I had to re-watch some of them to get the round right. Obviously the judges dont have this luxury and do it live. I agree that the 118-110 score was absurd. With that being said it was a good fight and I am eager for the rematch.
Thanks for that insight.
I wasn't aware boxing was scored in one universal way. People are impressionable in very different ways, and this was another example in a long list of that in this sport.
The scoring system used in professional boxing is called the 10-Point Must System. These are the basics for scoring a round:
Judges score on a 10-point scale. Most rounds will end 10-9, with the more dominant boxer receiving 10 points, the other receiving 9.
If a boxer is knocked down, he loses a point. If a boxer is knocked down twice, he loses two points. If both fighters are knocked down, the knockdowns cancel each other out.
While uncommon, if a fighter completely dominates a round but doesnt score a knockdown, a judge can still score that round 10-8.
If a judge deems the round completely even, both fighters receive 10 points.
When the referee sees fit, he can take away a point or two for an intentional foul; he can do the same for unintentional ones, but that usually occurs after at least a warning.
While youd probably do well relying on the eyeball test to determine the winner of each round, it helps to know what a judge is looking for. These are the things that help determine which fighter won a round:
Effective Aggression Being aggressive gives the impression of dominance, but unless the boxer is landing shots and not constantly getting countered, its not exactly effective. Judges look for effective aggression, where the aggressor consistently lands his punches and avoids those from his opponent.
Ring Generalship The fighter who controls the action and enforces his will and style.
Defense How well is a boxer slipping, parrying, and blocking punches? Good defense is important.
Hard and Clean Punches To the untrained eye, it can appear as if a boxer is landing a lot of shots, when, in fact, most are being blocked or arent landing flush. A judge needs to look for hard shots that land clean.
There's a universal way for scoring in boxing. Maybe the OP for other boxing fights should have this to inform the discussion a little bit.
http://coolmaterial.com/feature/how-to-score-a-boxing-match/
lol giving 6, 8 and 9 to Canelo
I fail to see how he imposed his style or will on Canelo.Notice how the link posted doesn't disagree with what I said.
Canelo is a better overall fighter than GGG. He has more tools at his disposal and gives you variety.
His main Achilles heel has always been his stamina. If he would've retain that energy for two or three more rounds, he would've clearly won the fight, and him bulking up only exposed that weakness even further. Once he got tired, his power shots became less effective and GGG was just walking through everything and out working him.
The Khan KO was satisfying as fuck.Khan is shit, if he is in your top 5 wins it says something.
Canelo winning those last three rounds got him the draw.
Yeah he was outworking Canelo in the middle rounds up until that point. They don't call 10-12 the championship rounds for nothing.Yea if Gennady solidified one of those rounds it would've been good for him to get the full win.
lol giving 6, 8 and 9 to Canelo