Also fuck the cops for killing the dog, I'll take an endangered animal over a little kid with obviously poor genes any day.
When I read this in the OP, my jaw literally dropped.UPDATE:
"Pittsburgh police Major Crimes Lt. Kevin Kraus said the boy's 34-year-old mother placed the child in a standing position on a wooden railing overlooking the enclosure."
ffs... horrible story all around.
I guess usually they wouldn't be aggressive, but if they consider the boy as their "food" it would probably be really dangerous to try to separate him from them. Even my Golden Retriever turns into a wild animal when you try to take his food away.They were on National Geographic's World's Deadliest:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82kQTkWnKwg
Most animals don't attack adult humans, but I don't think 14 of them would have that much difficulty killing an unarmed adult if they wanted to.
Even though it seem like it's the parent's fault, that'a a tough lesson to learn. I imagine she placed the child on the railing to get a better look, then took her eyes off the child.
Wow.
Also fuck the cops for killing the dog, I'll take an endangered animal over a little kid with obviously poor genes any day.
The mother made a horrible mistake, and she's going to have to live with the consequence for the rest of her life. As stupid and preventable as it was, I wouldn't wish that kind of torture on anyone.
.
Fucked up story on all counts. I find it kind of ridiculous that you'd kill a wild animal for acting like a wild animal, but I guess the child was endangered at that point, and this wasn't after the entire ordeal or anything. So that kinda makes sense.
You make is sound like she had an abortion, she didn't.
If it could of saved the child they should of shot every damn dog there
You don't have kids.I disagree with this. 11 endangered mammals for one human child? Bad trade.
I disagree with this. 11 endangered mammals for one human child? Bad trade.
I disagree with this. 11 endangered mammals for one human child? Bad trade.
Really crappy situation all around, I just hope the zoo or dogs get the brunt end of it. There are countless exhibits where you could get mauled if you were to hop over/fall over the rail, it's not the dogs' fault for having basic animal instincts. And those dogs are incredibly good hunters for their size.
in this case should they have shot all 11 dogs with either bullets or darts ?
I'm just saying that if that happened to my daughter, I'd jump in there after them. I know things are different when you're in the situation, but I also know what it is to be a dad since I am one, and watching my daughter get ripped apart by dogs isn't something I'd be okay with.
Situations like a person on the street that I don't know being assaulted by random people that I don't know and this situation are quite different.
A 14 foot drop does complicate things, but if you lowered yourself as far as possible before jumping then the drop would be a lot more manageable. Either way, I'd be in there. I'm sure the mom feels horrible about it now and will probably replay that day in her head for the rest of her life. That's probably worse than anything anyone could say to her.
This part does certainly seem like negligent parenting to me:
So basically the issue is that the wire mesh was not fully-secured to the top of the railing along its entire length? The early reports made it sound like this kid climbed to the top where the mesh meets the roof instead of falling through the bottom of it. That must have been a pretty decently-sized gap in the mesh for small child to slip through. Either that, or the kid was in the absolute midpoint of the open seam and the mother completely lost a grip on him for him to slip through with enough force to open a gap.
If it could of saved the child they should of shot every damn dog there
You don't have kids.
What if it were you?
I disagree with this. 11 endangered mammals for one human child? Bad trade.
that's dumb. you're already dead from the fall. humans aren't gods, they're supposed to be part of this world. sometimes we die in stupid ways.
that's dumb. you're already dead from the fall. humans aren't gods, they're supposed to be part of this world. sometimes we die in stupid ways.
Not at all, but speaking from personal experience, having kids changed me drastically, to the point where it's no longer possible for me to respond to a question like this without considering the well being of my children first answer foremost.
I'd eliminate an entire species of dog to save them, no question. This coming from a vegetarian that values animal life greatly.
its just an animal.
The zoo is in deep shit. There is only a handful of exhibits there where you can possibly "fall in". Off the top of my head, the sea lions, the beaver, and that is about it. A couple of exhibits you could easily break in to if you were an unsupervised 13 year old or something, but those are just like the camel and the lama and that stuff. The large cats and bears all have either safety glass or a large ditch that wouldn't be possible to circumvent.
Apparently these dogs are the most dangerous exhibit there and they had none of these additional safety measures. I agree that it is largely the Mom's fault, however a lawyer will have a field day with this. There is only 1 layer of safety in this exhibit unlike all of the other dangerous animals. This is compounded by the fact that I'm guessing the majority of people don't know how dangerous these animals are, since daily exposure to dogs is of the domesticated variety.
The zoo is in deep shit. There is only a handful of exhibits there where you can possibly "fall in". Off the top of my head, the sea lions, the beaver, and that is about it. A couple of exhibits you could easily break in to if you were an unsupervised 13 year old or something, but those are just like the camel and the lama and that stuff. The large cats and bears all have either safety glass or a large ditch that wouldn't be possible to circumvent.
Apparently these dogs are the most dangerous exhibit there and they had none of these additional safety measures. I agree that it is largely the Mom's fault, however a lawyer will have a field day with this. There is only 1 layer of safety in this exhibit unlike all of the other dangerous animals. This is compounded by the fact that I'm guessing the majority of people don't know how dangerous these animals are, since daily exposure to dogs is of the domesticated variety.
well I have people that I care greatly about too. but i'm not going on a killing spree against animals. i'm just not, and I think deep down you know you're not.
The zoo is in deep shit. There is only a handful of exhibits there where you can possibly "fall in". Off the top of my head, the sea lions, the beaver, and that is about it. A couple of exhibits you could easily break in to if you were an unsupervised 13 year old or something, but those are just like the camel and the lama and that stuff. The large cats and bears all have either safety glass or a large ditch that wouldn't be possible to circumvent.
Apparently these dogs are the most dangerous exhibit there and they had none of these additional safety measures. I agree that it is largely the Mom's fault, however a lawyer will have a field day with this. There is only 1 layer of safety in this exhibit unlike all of the other dangerous animals. This is compounded by the fact that I'm guessing the majority of people don't know how dangerous these animals are, since daily exposure to dogs is of the domesticated variety.
Well, I'm no lawyer, but the simple fact that the mother put her child in a position where he could fall into the exhibit would make me think that the Zoo is not at all to blame. The safety measures that were in place would have been sufficient if it wasn't for the mother putting her child on the railing.
Was there a seperate barrier between the balcony and the dogs? It sounds like there wasn't and I'm sure that is considered standard enclosure design practice for such animals.
Im sure she would trade all the money in the world to have her son back.Yup. Big money coming the mom's way.
I don't get it, so you wouldn't kill a few animals to save someone you cared about? You'd just stand there watching them get mauled to death?
Im sure she would trade all the money in the world to have her son back.
hell most 3-year olds aren't even old enough to appreciate teh zoo to begin with.
She wouldn't have to if she were a responsible person.
This is the enclosure.
Looks like there is a mesh barrier on top of the railing. I guess the kid got onto the railing, and fell through the mesh. I don't think any adult humans would be able to get through that mesh and into the exhibit.
Not in the middle section. The mom stood the kid up on the railing and let go of him. He fell in almost immediately.
So which railing? I can't really see any other than those in the enclosure. Other than that all I see is a metal fence surrounding the exhibit? Is there a railing that is not really easily seen from these photos?
The middle one as illustrated here:
Holy shit. Thanks for that. Wow. Why put a mesh up for all the other railings instead of that one? weird.
The only criminal charges should be to the parent for child endangerment.
Seems like the zoo has reasonable security, and there must be posted signs as well. At some point the people have to take responsibility and not put it all on the zoo. Reasonable security is the key. The zoo isn't responsible for blatant stupidity.
You should never have kids.
On one hand, the mother should not be allowed to care for children again, for fear that she could another child in danger again. On the other hand, the pain of seeing her 2-year-old child mauled in front of her is probably punishment enough.