Spoiled Milk
Banned
https://www.yahoo.com/news/senate-report-on-cia-torture-1429636113023030.html
But there are other copies. Will Barrack Obama keep his Chaos Emeralds?
That's all I'm posting. Much more at the link. Also, I want to point out that this presidential election has the CIA torture report at stake. If a Republican is elected, those copies will be returned to the Senate and destroyed.
Delete me if old.
The CIA inspector generals office the spy agencys internal watchdog has acknowledged it mistakenly destroyed its only copy of a mammoth Senate torture report at the same time lawyers for the Justice Department were assuring a federal judge that copies of the document were being preserved, Yahoo News has learned.
The deletion of the document has been portrayed by agency officials to Senate investigators as an inadvertent foul-up by the inspector general. In what one intelligence community source described as a series of errors straight out of the Keystone Cops, CIA inspector general officials deleted an uploaded computer file with the report and then accidentally destroyed a disk that also contained the document, filled with thousands of secret files about the CIAs use of enhanced interrogation methods.
Its breathtaking that this could have happened, especially in the inspector generals office theyre the ones that are supposed to be providing accountability within the agency itself, said Douglas Cox, a City University of New York School of Law professor who specializes in tracking the preservation of federal records. It makes you wonder what was going on over there?
But there are other copies. Will Barrack Obama keep his Chaos Emeralds?
To ensure the document was circulated widely within the government, and to preserve it for future declassification, Feinstein, in her closing days as chair, instructed that computer disks containing the full report be sent to the CIA and its inspector general, as well as the other U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies. Aides said Feinstein specifically included a separate copy for the CIA inspector general because she wanted the office to undertake a full review. Her goal, as she wrote at the time, was to ensure that the system of detention and interrogation described in this report is never repeated.
But her successor, Republican Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina, quickly asked for all of the disks to be returned, even threatening at one point to send a committee security officer to retrieve them. He contended the volumes are congressional records that were never intended for executive branch, much less public, distribution.
The administration, while not complying with Burrs demand to return the disks, has essentially sided with him against releasing them to the public. Early last year, Justice lawyers instructed federal agencies to keep their copies of the document under lock and key, unopened, lest the courts treat them as government records subject to the Freedom of Information Act. Weeks later, in an effort to head off a motion for emergency relief by the ACLU, a Justice Department lawyer told U.S. Judge James Boasberg that no copies of the report would be returned to Congress or destroyed; the government can assure the Court that it will preserve the status quo until the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit was resolved, wrote Vesper Mei, a senior counsel in the Justice Departments civil division, in a February 2015 filing.
That's all I'm posting. Much more at the link. Also, I want to point out that this presidential election has the CIA torture report at stake. If a Republican is elected, those copies will be returned to the Senate and destroyed.
Delete me if old.