LMAO. Please tell GAF who these teams in the almighty SECW are that will give Bama L's.
Based on the three games so far, I'd definitely pencil in LSU as a loss and maybe TAMU. Arkansas isn't outside the realm of possibility either with the way this team has looked, and how Arkansas has actually looked decent.
Ivey won't miss time. That is for targeting only. Tyler Jordan was out yesterday and may be out against Tennessee.
They say Del Rio barely beat out Appleby for the starting job so hopefully there won't be a massive drop off like in previous years.
I can only assume all the people putting Bama at 1 have not watched Bama play outside the USC game. Offense was terrible against an overwhelmed WKU team and both sides of the ball looked bad against an Ole Miss team that will do well to win 8 games. Going to require some serious soul searching if they want to win the division, let alone get in the playoff.
1. OSU
2. Louisville
3. Michigan
4. Houston
5. Michigan State
6. Washington
7. Clemson
8. Wisconsin
9. Alabama
10. Stanford
Or something, I dunno.
Exactly.. Bama just beat arguably the only team in the conference that was their main impediment. Bama will remain number one until they shit the bed. OSU will not jump them before then.Who is going to beat Bama in the West or hell the East. Ole Miss is out two games they're done, LSU doesn't have a QB, A&M is A&M, Florida just lost their QB, Georgia I dunno haven't watched them. SEC isn't that hard to win for them honestly.
We'll find out this Saturday when A&M and Arkansas play. That'll give a clearer picture of who the #2 team in the west might be.Bert can't beat Bama. Period. The only team in that division that could possibly beat them is A&M
Ah, for some reason I thought any ejection lead to a suspension.
More people lost. Shear attrition.How the fuck do the Vols and Dawgs keep going up after terrible wins?
coaches: sec grit and intangiblesHow the fuck do the Vols and Dawgs keep going up after terrible wins?
Ole miss still ranked is an absolute joke and anyone who voted them should be embarrassed
I mean, they still hanged tough against Alabama. Not a lot of people put up 40+ against Bama.Ole miss still ranked is an absolute joke and anyone who voted them should be embarrassed
Ole miss still ranked is an absolute joke and anyone who voted them should be embarrassed
Also, San Diego at 22, NDSU receiving votes at #28.
I mean, they still hanged tough against Alabama. Not a lot of people put up 40+ against Bama.
I mean, they still hanged tough against Alabama. Not a lot of people put up 40+ against Bama.
Is there even a point in voting for FCS teams? Novelty? Or just everybody is so bad they needed someone else to vote for?
But Oklahoma at 25 in the AP poll is a-okay. No B12 bias there?Ole miss still ranked is an absolute joke and anyone who voted them should be embarrassed
I've always thought rankings were dumb in my opinion and it should be more about how well they played versus the wins they got but that's just me.Did they win? If we're going to count all most we're heading down a slippery slope.
Happened when App. State beat #5 Michigan. AP voters really seem to love their pre-season rankings, rewarding "huge upsets" rather than punishing incorrectly ranked teams.
Lot of good teams win close games. Lot of championship teams have those. Not saying either are championship teams but what counts is the W. You can even lose to a bad Va Tech team and win the championship.How the fuck do the Vols and Dawgs keep going up after terrible wins?
Lot of good teams win close games. Lot of championship teams have those. Not saying either are championship teams but what counts is the W. You can even lose to a bad Va Tech team and win the championship.
Also, lot of teams lost above them.
Then I guess Boise State should've been in the championship game instead Florida in '06 huh?No 1-2 team should ever be ranked above an unbeaten. Ever.
I can't think of any justification for that. You can say Ole Miss "played well", but really all they did was blow two big leads back to back. They're half a team, basically.
Then I guess Boise State should've been in the championship game instead Florida in '06 huh?
Is there even a point in voting for FCS teams? Novelty? Or just everybody is so bad they needed someone else to vote for?
Georgia I can understand because they did beat North Carolina, but Tennessee barely beat an App State that just got killed by Miami at home, beat up on a mediocre VT team and then struggled to put away Ohio.
I see absolutely zero reason they should still be above UF, Arkansas, Miami or Baylor.
But Oklahoma at 25 in the AP poll is a-okay. No B12 bias there?
The bottom of the poll is fine.The top part of the poll is the bigger farce.
Georgia has a neutral site win over a ranked team and a win against a conference opponent on the road. Tennessee at least has a win against a P5 opponent at Brostol. Other than that, not much impressive there.
What has Florida done to deserve it? Or Miami?
Miami has beaten FAU, App State, and Florida A&M. Quite a resume.
Florida has beaten North Texas, Umass, and Kentucky.
Baylor has beaten Northwestern State, Rice, and SMU.
I don't know. Maybe SDSU is a good football team, and is currently considered among the top 25 of them?
Scores matter but it's not the determining factor. Plus, none of the teams you mentioned have a win over a P5 team. Period.So somehow scores no longer matter? They barely beat two cupcakes.
Scores matter but it's not the determining factor. Plus, none of the teams you mentioned have a win over a P5 team. Period.
Haha forgot about Kentucky. Yeah, they are P5.Kentucky sucks but they're still P5 bro
How is that bad logic? You said no 1Loss or 2 loss team should be ranked above an undefeated team. So going by that, Florida should've been ranked behind a perfect Boise State.I'm almost definitely not watching gameday next week. It's going to be all Rocky Top and "It's been 11 years!"
Bad logic: by the end of the season we have a decent idea of ratio and a lot more talking points. Right now, Ole Miss is 1 for 3.
Alabama could get blown the fuck out by A&M for all we know. People said Ole Miss looked presentable against FSU who was supposed to be good, but then look how that turned out this week.
How is that bad logic? You said no 1Loss or 2 loss team should be ranked above an undefeated team. So going by that, Florida should've been ranked behind a perfect Boise State.
Goes back to preseason rankings influencing perception. If Ole Miss loses to top teams they won't drop much because of who they lost to. It'll all work itself out eventually.No sense in freaking out at this point. A 7-5 Ole Miss, or 8-4 OU isn't going to be ranked at the end of the season, end of story.
I don't see why it is responsible to keep them ranked while there are other unbeatens or 1 loss teams more deserving of being in, but whatever.