Fresh Prince
Banned
Give it 2 years then it'll happen.
So what if they have nuclear weapons, are we gonna attack india and pakistan now too?
DarienA said:When does it f'n end?
ge-man said:At this rate, the only measure left would be for the rest of the world to invade us. I don't want to sound like an asshole, but who in the hell voted for Bush? Are they blind or are they stupid?
:lol You're kidding right? Iran has been demonised in the U.S for close to a few decades now. And now they're a part of the axis of evil what with them mullahs and hating America and harbouring Al-Qaeda!as it's common knowledge that for the most part, Iran isn't nearly as extreme as Iraq and N. Korea are in its human rights abuses
Do you think it's too late to claim that Iran was really the driving force behind 9/11 ?kablooey said:Also, this war will be a lot harder to sell domestically, as it's common knowledge that for the most part, Iran isn't nearly as extreme as Iraq and N. Korea are in its human rights abuses, despite Bush painting them into the Axis of Evil.
Although...I wouldn't put it past Bush to make an attempt to sell this war, I think even an only half-awake American populace would oppose a potential war completely. There's no way it's gonna happen.
Acrylamid said:Do you think it's too late to claim that Iran was really the driving force behind 9/11 ?
Like I said, I really think any move to bring this matter to U.N Security Council will be vetoed by Russia and China. Iran and Russia are very close to announcing a new nuclear fuel contract, and China I believe in November/December revealed their $70 billion oil and natural gas deal with Iran. Both are long-term deals. I'm sure Iran has asked some kinds of veto guarentees from them before they signed those deals.Macam said:It's just not an option. I think Rice is trying to convey to Iran that this game cannot, and will not, hang indefinitely, and that if they don't accept the European offer than America will use its leverage to report them to the UN Security Council as soon as possible -- and from there, I strongly suspect NATO will come into play.
It sounds to me very clearly like she's referring to sanctions.
android said:They have no international obligations. They aren't under sanctions. Do the Bushies really think they have the right to determine which countries can have which weapons.
Acrylamid said:Do you think it's too late to claim that Iran was really the driving force behind 9/11 ?
So wait the majority of 9/11 Hijackers were Iranian not Saudi Arabian?Acrylamid said:Do you think it's too late to claim that Iran was really the driving force behind 9/11 ?
DonasaurusRex said:So what if they have nuclear weapons, are we gonna attack india and pakistan now too? they both have nuke capability and HATE each other. Why arent we there dis arming dangerous powers. This is just BS we have more nuclear capability in 3 nuclear subs than Iran could ever hope to have.
alright, NOW you're scaring me.Phoenix said:Actually we have more capability in a single Ohio Class SSBN which can carry 24 MIRV warheads than all 3 countries are estimated to have combined.
bune duggy said:alright, NOW you're scaring me.