Qutb didn't spread the head banging Madrasahs to Pakistan; that was Saudi Arabia. Qutb also wasn't responsible for helping to unleash the Taliban; that was Saudi Arabia and Pakistan's ISA. Qutb didn't use billion in newly acquired oil wealth to spread that cancerous Wahhabi ideology globally; that was Saudi Arabia and its Gulf Arab allies.
Same countries have fucked over Pakistan, Afghanistan, and other Muslim countries as well. Wahhabism is a cancer
Saudi is fucking scum
It's a really simplistic approach. Wahhabism don't explain ISIS alone.
ISIS is doctrinally wahhabi but politically the son of Seyyed Qutb, who was not wahhabi. If you don't have Qutb in the equation, you don't have ISIS/Al Qaida.
In France, Saudi Arabia printed ten of thousands of booklet who were spread in the mosque rebuking the arguments of ISIS.
French specialists (Burgat, Roy..) of islamist terrorism argue that salafism as a whole is playing a complicated role. Since Saudi Arabia is spreading a purely quietist form of wahhabism, it's a direct obstacle for politicization, hence, an obstacle for ISIS radicalization.
I used to have this kind of explanation, but you can see movement like the Muwahhidun in maghrib in the classical time, who did thing like the original wahhabi movement but from a rationalist perspective, killing people who had literalist interpretation of the attribute of God .
Sounds like a self perpetuating machine.Well he's not wrong. If Saudi money were removed from the equation there's no exported wahabbism. It's crazy that we'd rather invade other countries than tell Saudi Arabia to knock it off. At the same time we're supporting Israel. Talk about bipolar geopolitical madness.
Marine le Pen/Mélenchon do the same thing.
Putin says the same thing. Iran says the same thing. Assad says the same thing.
Nothing brave or original.
That's why banning your own country from selling arms to them is counterproductive, but what can be done is that a country's military can boycott manufacturers that sell to Saudi Arabia. That means the manufacturer have a choice: they can either sell to Saudi Arabia and lose the British (and other) markets, or they can drop Saudi Arabia and gain access to the markets that are part of the boycott.
I'm no expert, but isn't Corbyn a twat?
Nonsense. You're literally claiming whabbism is an obstacle to Isis? Gtfo. Embarrassing as usual. I prefer you when you're stanning for erdogan.
I'm done with your intellectually dishonest shit. Ignore list.
But isn't this pretty much public knowledge at this point? That they fund the terrorists, while making financial / trade deals with the politicians of the affected countries.
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." ~ Someone
A racist Tory hated democracy why I neverWinston Churchill
I can understand why Stinkles reacted strongly. Saudi Arabia's influence (in the form of tens of billions of dollars spread around the globe to promote their insane version of Islam) has literally ruined the Sunni Muslim world. Like, pretty much every Sunni Muslim country is descending into murderous intolerance of minorities and becoming more extreme by the day.Woah, that escalated quickly. What's with the lashing out? I feel like I'm missing something.
I'm trying to understand what's going on here and the weird dynamic between countries and geopolitical stuff, but I do feel like there's often a lot of missing context to the conversation.
I can get behind the sentiment, fuck Saudi Arabia.
But surely in the unfortunate event this broken clock is elected, and he follows through with his "difficult conversations", what real impact will that have? (in the context of terrorism, I'm all for weakening SA and their free pass to obliterate civilians in Yemen)
Surely that's closing the door after the horse had bolted. We already have these cockroaches peddling death here, they're not going to stop believing our culture is filthy and degenerate and they're not going to stop grooming worthless misfits into becoming mass murderers. Whether or not their cash flow stops or slows.
But baby steps. If we can at least name and shame the fundraisers it's a start. That shitheap of a nation deserves nothing but disgust and suspicion on the international stage.
The sooner the governments stop turning a blind eye to Saudi, the sooner they'll stop being hypocrites. I don't see that stopping anytime soon until the oil $$ runs out lol. I don't know much about politics, but I guess it's always matters of national interest rather than "good" vs "bad", even if it means doing deal with the devil.
Woah, that escalated quickly. What's with the lashing out?
I can understand why Stinkles reacted strongly. Saudi Arabia's influence (in the form of tens of billions of dollars spread around the globe to promote their insane version of Islam) has literally ruined the Sunni Muslim world. Like, pretty much every Sunni Muslim country is descending into murderous intolerance of minorities and becoming more extreme by the day.
Golden_Pigeon is basically saying that Saudi Arabia's particular brand of insane Islam can be used to counteract ISIS's particular brand of insane Islam. Which may be technically true, in the way that, say, Stalinism could crowd out Maoism, or Italian-style fascism could overpower Austrian fascism. He claims to be bringing nuance to the discussion, but it's not the type of nuance that any reasonable person should embrace.
I can understand why Stinkles reacted strongly. Saudi Arabia's influence (in the form of tens of billions of dollars spread around the globe to promote their insane version of Islam) has literally ruined the Sunni Muslim world. Like, pretty much every Sunni Muslim country is descending into murderous intolerance of minorities and becoming more extreme by the day.
Golden_Pigeon is basically saying that Saudi Arabia's particular brand of insane Islam can be used to counteract ISIS's particular brand of insane Islam. Which may be technically true, in the way that, say, Stalinism could crowd out Maoism, or Italian-style fascism could overpower Austrian fascism. He claims to be bringing nuance to the discussion, but it's not the type of nuance that any reasonable person should embrace.
I can understand why Stinkles reacted strongly. Saudi Arabia's influence (in the form of tens of billions of dollars spread around the globe to promote their insane version of Islam) has literally ruined the Sunni Muslim world. Like, pretty much every Sunni Muslim country is descending into murderous intolerance of minorities and becoming more extreme by the day.
Golden_Pigeon is basically saying that Saudi Arabia's particular brand of insane Islam can be used to counteract ISIS's particular brand of insane Islam. Which may be technically true, in the way that, say, Stalinism could crowd out Maoism, or Italian-style fascism could overpower Austrian fascism. He claims to be bringing nuance to the discussion, but it's not the type of nuance that any reasonable person should embrace.
We're speaking about ISIS/Al Qaida, not the talibans. They are ideologically distinct and don't have the same political methodology, even if they are both equally disgusting.
For the record, i think that Saudi Arabia is as worse as ISIS. Bringing complexity is not defending.
it's a stupid argument for more reasons than just that. hardcore islamists of all stripes hate the sauds for sure because they're venal and corrupt, but some members of that family do send a lot of money into the pockets of extremists for mostly political reasons. and besides that, saudi arabia is domestically oppressive, anti-democratic, corrupt as fuck, and have been committing war crimes in yemen (with the help of the US and UK) for years that have fueled humanitarian crises and even more extremism.
handing out some anti-ISIS pamphlets in france means basically nothing. nobody should be friends with these fucks.
No.I'm no expert, but isn't Corbyn a twat?
Well he was elected to be the leader of the Labour Party, second most powerful political party in the UK in 2015 and his party is running in the general elections on Thursday.
Please elect Corbyn UK.
He's not perfect, far from it, but he's a step in a better direction.
Well he was elected to be the leader of the Labour Party, second most powerful political party in the UK in 2015 and his party is running in the general elections on Thursday.
What I'm trying to say is, watch this space.Tbf, second out of two isn't really that impressive.
I hate this fucking quote so much. It disregards the actual problems that democracy is facing with pseudointellectual bullshit about the average voters being too dumb to deserve a vote."The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." ~ Someone
I would like to note something, one must differentiate between post and pre-9/11 Saudi Arabia.
it's true, Saudi Arabia has had a history funding extremists. this was at its highest with Alqaeda during their war with the soviets.
After 9/11 there was a HUGE change in the country, religious study curriculums were changed, religious sermons were monitored, almost all foreign missionary organizations (Saudi groups that spread Islam in foreign countries) were closed.
Nowadays extremism is public enemy no.1. They preach against extremism in mosques, in schools, in all forms of media. Any serious talk supporting extremism will send you to jail or worse.
What still happens is Saudi supporting Syrian rebels. Many of whom the US supports as well.
most governments know this, I know the US is heavily involved in the Saudi anti-extremism reform. They know what's being done.
Saudi Arabia is shit for so many reasons. But saying they are the main funders of extremism in this day and age is incorrect.