well lets just go by the math and the numbers.
I mean, you know, some people like to believe all humans are created equal, but you look at Ronda and you look at Floyd, and you can see that statement is not true. See, normally if you go one-on-one with another fighter in the UFC, you got a 50-50 chance of winning. But Ronda Rousey has shown to be a genetic freak, and shes not normal, so you got a 25% at best at beating her. And then you add Floyd's grappling inexperience to the mix? His chances of winning drastic go down.
See in an mma fight, in the UFC, Floyd has got a 33 1/3 chance of winning. But Ronda, she got a 66 2/3 chance of winning, cause Floyd KNOWS he cant grapple her, and hes not even gonna try. So take Floyd's 33 1/3 chance, minus his disadvantage of knees and kicks and he's got an 8 1/3 chance of winning in the UFC. But then you take Ronda's 75 perchance chance at winning if it was 1 on 1 with a normal fighter, and add 66 2/3 percents, She's got a 141 2/3 chance of winning in a UFC fight.
See, the numbers don't lie, and they spell disaster for Floyd.
If WSHH has taught me anything it's that gender means jack shit when it comes to a person's ability to take a punch.
so again, Ronda takes down Mayweather and through the magic of grappling Floyd Mayweather forgets how to punch and doesn't just wail on Ronda's ribs, backs, stomach, legs, or face and she automatically wins right?
so you are just going to disregard that all those fighters are very competent at grappling? It's because those skills cancel out that good striking becomes an advantage.That's not true at all. If we look at modern day MMA - the fights are heavily biased towards stand up and striking. Most top ranked fighters are winning fights mainly because of their striking ability; guys like Anderson Silva, Jon Jones and Cain Velasquez. Jon Jones' may have a background in wrestling, but he is mainly winning fights because of striking - he has far more knock outs than submissions.
so how much preparation do you give him? half a year, one year, two years? The premise is that they fight "now", it doesn't make any sense to give him extended preparation time because that invalidates the comparison.If Floyd fought Ronda in the UFC it wouldn't be under short notice. Floyd has enough money to bring in the very best wrestling, jits and striking coaches to get him ready for the fight. There is absolutely no possibility of Ronda ever winning.
in your mind, how exactly does those magical punches happen? do you think she is going to stand and trade with him?so again, Ronda takes down Mayweather and through the magic of grappling Floyd Mayweather forgets how to punch and doesn't just wail on Ronda's ribs, backs, stomach, legs, or face and she automatically wins right?
A lot of smaller boxers and MMA fighters have proven that a lighter, faster person can kick the shit out of a bigger one.
So I don't see why not.
1. Not biased at all. I train out of Gracie Barra but I'm not one of those fools who believes that BJJ prevails over all. An elite grappler with rudimentary striking will beat an elite striker with rudimentary grappling 9/10 times though. There are so many inherent strategic and technical advantages to being able to grapple.
2. Slowest? Probably. Worst boxer? Absolutely. Technical ability? Absolutely not. Floyd has trained to fight boxers. Punching is one (important) aspect of fighting but it doesn't paint the whole picture. Being a good boxer doesn't make you a complete fighter.
3. Good footwork is not goodfootwork across the board. I've already made this point. Judo footwork is based on the idea of setting yourself up at specific angles to where you can get your hips underneath your opponent. The methods in which judokas do this are vastly different from boxers. What is good footwork in judo doesn't necessarily translate to good footwork in boxing - and vice versa. What constitutes good footwork and positioning are determined by the rulesets of their respective sports. To illustrate this, I'm going to use two striking arts.
4. Ronda doesn't require a clinch to take someone down. Judo up until 2012 had singles, doubles, ankle picks as a part of their curriculum. Those things are also important in MMA as well. There isn't a single UFC fighter that does not know how to do a single or double leg takedown. Ronda doesn't show it off in fights because she's much better at the clinch and that's where her opponents are the weakest.
So the point of this is to illustrate something. The Muay Thai guy had just enough training in regular kickboxing to recognize the openings whereas the American guy had no prior experience in dealing with lower body kicks to shore up his defenses. This is my point with Ronda Rousey vs Floyd Mayweather. All you the people here who are making claims about how Floyd is going to defend Ronda's attacks don't realize he understand that if never trained vs anyone who actually grapples in his life, you can't just pick it up in the middle of a fight. Ronda has trained enough boxing to recognize that she is going to be outboxed and will switch to a different tactic.
Rhonda > Floyd in MMA rules
Floyd > Rhoda in boxing rules
Rhonda > Floyd in a street fight. There's no ref stopping her from breaking your arm off.
Boxers shouldn't even come under this discussion.
I'm sorry, i don't follow MMA, would guys mind explaining me the reasoning here?
Weight categories are made for fairness, but she is a grown woman, and if she wants to test out her skill or whatever, if she wants to fight, why is anyone else's business? It's not like it has to be an official tournament fight. And what does domestic violence has to do with it?
As for the danger, i get that, but you're always in danger when you get on the ring, and again, no one is forcing anyone, it'd be her choice.
EDIT: For clarity, i was thinking of a "one off" sort of thing, not like inserting her in the male league or anything like that, if that makes any sense.
No, that i get.Because pound for pound men are stronger than women, there is no easier way to put it. Just to put it into perspective, boys in high school varsity can out perform women olympians.
http://www.trackandfieldnews.com/index.php/lists
Look at those times and compare and contrast times for high school boys with women world records (spoiler: there are many high school boys faster than the fastest woman in the world), there is no sugar coating it when it comes to numbers. There is a reason why we compete seperately.
Don't get me wrong I would love for there to be a fight like this because it would show just how many people are ignorant to the scientific facts of evolution.
Why even consider an imaginary scenario where women and men didn't have different musculatures?
Re: your second question, it looks that much better because she's fighting women, absolutely.
He's not punching women in the ring.
Ronda Rousey is fighting a bunch of cans in all honesty. She's like Tito Ortiz was when he spent years easily defeating cans in the UFC. However out of the available talent pool I think girls like Cyborg and Gaby Garcia would give Ronda serious problems. But they're all in different weight classes. Honestly there are very few competitive female MMA fighters. The most athletic females are all playing other sports that get them Olympic medals.
If you assume a takedown, punching is generally out of the equation unless you're on the dominant position. Range of motion and all.
in your mind, how exactly does those magical punches happen? do you think she is going to stand and trade with him?
Rhonda would be killed in a street fight
Bruce lee enters the arena.2 ufc fighters vs a chimpanzee
who wins
I didn't realize MMA was so one dimensional. I guess that's why boxers dominate MMA matches.
I disagree with you, sir, in this hypothetical situation!
2 ufc fighters vs a chimpanzee
who wins
I don't follow UFC at all so I apologize if this is bad question.
Is it universally recognized that she is the best female MMA fight P4P? Or is she just the most marketable?
I see that she has only had 11 fights (11-0 record). In boxing that would make her a prospect (for the most part).
Let Rousey fight Fallon Fox first before we put her in the ring with Mayweather.
kkMMA fighters usually fight far less than boxers. She's also been a main event fighter since probably her first few fights. She's universally recognized as the P4P because nobody else in that particular division can touch her.
I am very sad that Holy Bakai got banned. Curse you all!
What about men vs women in sports. That question, is more nuanced than I think people give credit. The example people have been throwing around is the William's sisters against the german dude. Few points that probably should be made: it was only one set each, in women's tennis even the top ranked players lose semi-regularly to much lower ranked players, but more importantly is that they had no time to adapt. From what I've read, there was not too much difference in shot power, speed or technique. The most significant difference was the the sisters assumed certain shots were guaranteed winners and would not get into position fast enough, and that the dude was sending shots at angles they had not experienced before. This is due to the fact that in general, men are indeed better athletes than women. I am certain, though, that if the Williams were to play against men in a consistent manner, their timing and game would improve to make them much more competitive against men.
Here is where I come at this question. Ronda is not interested in fighting men, this is something people have built out around here to get a discussion going. She is also, for the most part, not interested in going out looking for fights.
She is the champion, she is at the top of her game, she is completely untouched. For this reason, while she just waits for a challenger to appear, she appears in movies, talk shows, commercials, etc and makes a shit ton of money. Then, she goes back to training camp, beats up the next person in line and repeats it again.
What about men vs women in sports. That question, is more nuanced than I think people give credit. The example people have been throwing around is the William's sisters against the german dude. Few points that probably should be made: it was only one set each, in women's tennis even the top ranked players lose semi-regularly to much lower ranked players, but more importantly is that they had no time to adapt. From what I've read, there was not too much difference in shot power, speed or technique. The most significant difference was the the sisters assumed certain shots were guaranteed winners and would not get into position fast enough, and that the dude was sending shots at angles they had not experienced before. This is due to the fact that in general, men are indeed better athletes than women. I am certain, though, that if the Williams were to play against men in a consistent manner, their timing and game would improve to make them much more competitive against men.
As for whats next for Rousey, the only person I have heard she has offered to fight at any other weight than 135 has been Carano, but that was never agreed to by Dana or UFC. That was just speculation. As it stands now, the only woman that could conceivably give her a fight is Cyborg, to which Ronda has expressed nothing but disdain. For that fight to even be considered Cyborg has to first come down to 135, then we'll see.
i could beat ronda rousey in a UFC fight and i've never had any formal mma training.
i could beat ronda rousey in a UFC fight and i've never had any formal mma training.
I'd watch Rousey vs Audience member exhibitions.i could beat ronda rousey in a UFC fight and i've never had any formal mma training.
She's the best WMMA fighter in the UFC. But until she beats Cyborg, she's not the undisputed best in the world.I don't follow UFC at all so I apologize if this is bad question.
Is it universally recognized that she is the best female MMA fight P4P? Or is she just the most marketable?
I see that she has only had 11 fights (11-0 record). In boxing that would make her a prospect (for the most part).
Rhonda > Floyd in MMA rules
Floyd > Rhoda in boxing rules
Rhonda > Floyd in a street fight. There's no ref stopping her from breaking your arm off.
Boxers shouldn't even come under this discussion.
I'd watch Rousey vs Audience member exhibitions.
I am not saying she would beat Andy Murray: Gold medalist in the Olympics, multiple time grand slam winner and one of the best tennis players in history. I am saying that given enough time she would not be easily beat by low ranked players like people are gleefully quoting left and right.
Your article also makes it super clear. She developed a game around the fact that her serve is powerful enough to disrupt the rhythm of even the best women players, but playing against men it would certainly not be enough. Had 14 year old Serena Williams played competitively against men, her game would have evolved in a very, very different manner.