• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Curt Schilling claims he lost Hall of Fame votes because he's a Republican

Status
Not open for further replies.

Edwardo

Member
I'd take Curt in any playoff game back when he was here, but I'm not putting him down as the best pitcher in the league at any time.
 
He definitely deserves credit for that but it's also at the end of the day a small sample size. To me that wouldn't put him on the level of someone who has had an entire HoF worthy career. I mean, would you argue that to this point Madison Bumgarner has had as good of a career as Clayton Kershaw?

It's enough to put him over the top, but not on its' own. Difference between Schilling and the other Hall of Very Good guys is his postseason resume. Mussina was pretty good in the postseason and never won a World Series. Schilling was a historically great postseason performer over a long period of time. It's not enough of it's own, but I'd say it's a tiebreaker.

And not to sound like a Dodger homer here, but Bumgarner has the benefit of an actual bullpen, as opposed to Kershaw and Greinke who were expected to throw 110+ pitches every time out, even on short rest. Put Kershaw on the Giants (hypothetically, please don't actually do that!) and he'd have a much better postseason output. I'd make the same argument with Bumgarner as Schilling, though: if he's good enough over his career to make the Hall of Very Good then his postseason resume should put him over the top into the HOF. Not before someone like Kershaw, but eventually.
 
I know you're joking, but Schilling would first have to establish that the HoF voters are predominantly liberal, and so significantly so that they wouldn't vote for a guy who was "against them."

I mean, surely we can agree there are a good number of old, conservative fogies who still have HoF ballots.

I think "old, conservativ fogey" probably describes the vast majority of HoF voters.

It wouldn't surprise me seeing how Republicans get talked about on here

I'd be very surprised if there was any overlap at all between "GAF member" and "HoF voter".
 

terrisus

Member
Schilling didn't get in because he's not yet good enough to get in.

"He's not yet good enough to get in?"
What?
Is he going to un-retire and pitch a couple more seasons or something?

He's actually related to the President.

thejoke.jpg
 
It's enough to put him over the top, but not on its' own. Difference between Schilling and the other Hall of Very Good guys is his postseason resume. Mussina was pretty good in the postseason and never won a World Series. Schilling was a historically great postseason performer over a long period of time. It's not enough of it's own, but I'd say it's a tiebreaker.

And not to sound like a Dodger homer here, but Bumgarner has the benefit of an actual bullpen, as opposed to Kershaw and Greinke who were expected to throw 110+ pitches every time out, even on short rest. Put Kershaw on the Giants (hypothetically, please don't actually do that!) and he'd have a much better postseason output. I'd make the same argument with Bumgarner as Schilling, though: if he's good enough over his career to make the Hall of Very Good then his postseason resume should put him over the top into the HOF. Not before someone like Kershaw, but eventually.


Agree 100%. I think it can be a deciding factor when two guys are very close in careers.
 
Maybe the fact you essentially stole state money for your terrible fucking video game that sold like 10 copies?

Seriously, KoA Reckoning wasn't that bad, but Skyrim just annihilated it.
 
Maybe the fact you essentially stole state money for your terrible fucking video game that sold like 10 copies?

Seriously, KoA Reckoning wasn't that bad, but Skyrim just annihilated it.

A majority of the people that vote for the hall of fame likely have no idea what a video game is outside if pong or ms. PacMan. I very much doubt his failed business endeavor has anything to do with his hall of fame candidacy.
 

terrisus

Member
Maybe the fact you essentially stole state money for your terrible fucking video game that sold like 10 copies?

Seriously, KoA Reckoning wasn't that bad, but Skyrim just annihilated it.

A majority of the people that vote for the hall of fame likely have no idea what a video game is outside if pong or ms. PacMan. I very much doubt his failed business endeavor has anything to do with his hall of fame candidacy.

And especially not how its quality compares to Skyrim.

"Yeah, I was thinking about voting for Schilling... But, darn, I would much rather play Skyrim than Kingdoms of Amalur, so to heck with him!"

"Kingdoms of Amalur? 3/10, would not vote for Hall of Fame."
 
Who gives a fuck about these Juicers and Republicans, next year is The Kid's year! ;_; My childhood finally goes into the HOF.

Let us all play Ken Griffey Jr SNES and N64 games in remembrance.

And you know Griffey Jr. didn't take any PED's how?
 

ampere

Member
And not to sound like a Dodger homer here, but Bumgarner has the benefit of an actual bullpen, as opposed to Kershaw and Greinke who were expected to throw 110+ pitches every time out, even on short rest. Put Kershaw on the Giants (hypothetically, please don't actually do that!) and he'd have a much better postseason output. I'd make the same argument with Bumgarner as Schilling, though: if he's good enough over his career to make the Hall of Very Good then his postseason resume should put him over the top into the HOF. Not before someone like Kershaw, but eventually.

Yeah it looked like Kershaw was just left in playoff games too long last year. The guys don't always know when they need to come out, the manager needs to be good at making that call and having a reliever.

Agree 100%. I think it can be a deciding factor when two guys are very close in careers.

There's also run support, right? I don't think the win/loss, ERA, and strikeout stats are enough to show that picture, unless it is factored in somehow I'm not aware of. For example Smoltz should have 1 or 2 more titles if the Braves had better run support in the 90s.
 
Griffey was as skinny as a rail and was injured constantly for the last half of his career. Pretty obvious in his case he did not take PED's...

If there is anything baseball fans should have learned in the last 10 years it's that there is no "pretty obvious" when it comes to who did and didn't take PEDs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom