nowhat
Member
Rutger Hauer all the way.What actor do you want in the Cyberpunk sequel?
I vote Jean Claude Van Damme.
Sure, he's dead now, but I'm sure an AI could pull it off (and this is with all respect to late Mr. Hauer).
Rutger Hauer all the way.What actor do you want in the Cyberpunk sequel?
I vote Jean Claude Van Damme.
CDPR hasn't still patched in a decent RPG.
Witcher 3 was a much better game.Cyberpunk 2077 is a masterpiece of a game wether you like it or not, and it was completely flawed, imagine if it wasn't. No game would reach it for years.
For the record, I don't think the Witcher games are the best RPGs ever by any measure (still quite enjoyed 2 and 3, never finished the first one). But I like my actions to have consequences in an RPG. In Cyberpunk, you have a default ending if you do no side content. If you grind it out, you have two more (and a third one, which is same for both). You can unlock and try to get the "secret ending" if you pick up a certain set of answers in a particular conversation - but again, nothing you've done up to that point matters at all. That's just weak IMHO.It's a better RPG than Witcher.
...and I'm out.Pawel is the Quest Director for Cyberpunk 2077.
If they actually learned anything, it shouldn't even come out on these platforms.
Witcher 4, 5, and 6 by CD Projeck Red. Canis Majoris is a spin-off by a third party.But erm Outsourced Witcher 4? Not sure Im ok with that unless its former MAJOR talent working on it.
"Cyberpunk 2077 sequel that will prove the full power and potential of the cyberpunk universe."
I'm not buying in until I see actual gameplay running on PS5 or Series X.
Difficult to get hyped seeing how the latest one ended up being a fiasco.
It's UE5 now, it's super easy to develop for, it will be much faster for CDProjectRed.
At the very least with both options. We've seen too many games with this for that excuse of them not being able to do both. RE8 is having some update where you can have both first and 3rd person.If it's not third person, I'm not buying it. That's the only thing that would even make me consider giving them money.
I would be happy if they just reused Night City and pulled a Yakuza. Change some things, new stories and characters - add some more features. Would save a ton on dev costs, time, and give us the definitive version of this city.
"Cyberpunk 2077 sequel that will prove the full power and potential of the cyberpunk universe."
Wait, didn't CDPR make the same sounding statements in the run up to 2077?!
![]()
I'm not buying in until I see actual gameplay running on PS5 or Series X.
I know you probably already know this but yeah the train has left on CP2077.how about they complete the first game?
jk im actually looking forward to it... it will look UNREAL in uNREAL ENGINE 5 pOWERED BY EPIC
Witcher 3 was a much better game.
Awesome! Loved the first game.
It'll be interesting to see what the swap to Unreal Engine means. Their current engine is delivering among the best visuals and graphics tech in the industry imo, I'm not cheering it's death.
You're too are vastly overestimating it. The only decisions that affect the ending in the witcher are a handful of interactions with Ciri on the last act.For the record, I don't think the Witcher games are the best RPGs ever by any measure (still quite enjoyed 2 and 3, never finished the first one). But I like my actions to have consequences in an RPG. In Cyberpunk, you have a default ending if you do no side content. If you grind it out, you have two more (and a third one, which is same for both). You can unlock and try to get the "secret ending" if you pick up a certain set of answers in a particular conversation - but again, nothing you've done up to that point matters at all. That's just weak IMHO.
I think people vastly overestimate how much your decisions in Witcher 3 affect the game world, but I still feel I got to roleplay more as Geralt than I did with V, a character of my own making, in Cyberpunk.
I haven't looked but I'm sure as usual, it's about appeasing the shareholders.Check their stock proce to know why they announced all that.
Honestly, I think they'll deliver, kinda like how Square Enix learned a hard lesson after FFXIV 1.0 went. Everyone laughed at them, myself included, when they promised the 2.0 do-over. I've seen a lot of comeback stories between that, No Man's Sky, and so forth. I think CDPR will turn the ship around and not repeat the same mistakes.
Still won't preorder though.
I think they already did, its been weeks since Edgerunners launch and CP is still in the top 10 most played games on steam, while also being the 1st most played singleplayer game.Honestly, I think they'll deliver, kinda like how Square Enix learned a hard lesson after FFXIV 1.0 went. Everyone laughed at them, myself included, when they promised the 2.0 do-over. I've seen a lot of comeback stories between that, No Man's Sky, and so forth. I think CDPR will turn the ship around and not repeat the same mistakes.
Still won't preorder though.
It sucked ass on shitty old hardware. The game was a good time on PC and deserving of a sequel.Difficult to get hyped seeing how the latest one ended up being a fiasco.
Cyberpunk was hyped for the better part of a decade. Poor performance on old systems aside, the game still sold a shit ton right out of the gate. Why wouldn't you try that strategy again?Sorry for sounding condescending, but what use does this information have? Announcing projects like this is completely useless. Just look at games like Agent, Deep Down, etc.
Also, I don't think it's even good for them, since they had a ver hard time with Cyberpunk 2077. They should've just make a project in secret, announce it when it's ready, redeem themselves and just then, talk about future projects.
They said as much when it was announced. I'd prefer a sequel to short expansions peppered out over a couple years. This expansion is 2.5 years after launch. I have no fucking recollection of anything in that game apart from Panam's ass.What this tells me more than anything is that they're not making any more expansions for Cyberpunk 2077.
The upcoming one will be the only one, and that's a crying shame, this game could've done with a lot more details and stories added to Night City.
The Witcher one says being developed by third party.The natural outcome after they divided their project teams into Witcher and Cyberpunk IP not too long ago. More surprised they have room for 3 Witcher projects.
"Cyberpunk 2077 sequel that will prove the full power and potential of the cyberpunk universe."
Wait, didn't CDPR make the same sounding statements in the run up to 2077?!
![]()
I'm not buying in until I see actual gameplay running on PS5 or Series X.
Nope, 2188.So the game will come out in 2030?
It's true, Digital Foundry gave CP2077 the best graphics award for a reason, with RT at max nothing come close, that you don't like the game or only play on consoles doesn't change anything, techwise the engine delivers.
It's true, Digital Foundry gave CP2077 the best graphics award for a reason, with RT at max nothing come close, that you don't like the game or only play on consoles doesn't change anything, techwise the engine delivers.
And look at the performance on the Matrix UE5 demo. What proof do we have that UE5 can actually pull off nice visuals with RT at decent framerates?![]()
I echo this, CD Project Red, take your time and please, tell those corpo suits to suck on it and release it "When it's ready."![]()
Fuck yeah, that's what I'm talking about. Fuck the haters.
All in, chooms!
LOL what? The writing and quest design ist what stands out the most from CDPRs work. If you are not playing their games for the characters, the world and the quests what are you even doing?They got the tech almost right, now please hire some competent writers. 2077 stories and characters are trash.
I wonder if they'll find a way to keep V around, as means to bring Keanu's Silverhand.
Playing cyberpunk without Silverhand's hallucinations would make it a very different game in terms of narrative.
D-doesn't matter that it sold well and the game was really good! It had some bugs at release! FIASCO!!Who gives a shit about sales.
I'm talking about not only the absolute bugfest it was at release, but also all the unfulfilled promises they made along the way. Sales numbers can't fix any of those.
It wasn't really good and it didn't have just some bugs. What it was, is a far departure from what they promised and a more than broken product at release.and the game was really good! It had some bugs at release!