Happened to TLOU 2
gotta take into account who reviewed it. Cant take that person serious after her days gone reviewGamespot gonna Gamespot
Cyberpunk 2077 Review (PC) – Superlative - PowerUp!
When the credits rolled on my playthrough of Cyberpunk 2077, I'd spent 45 or so hours in Night City. Having received the code only three days before the review embargo, I seriously doubted I'd finish in time. However, forgoing sleep and playing up to 18-hours a day, I saw V's journey through to...powerup-gaming.com
Calls it the best game he has ever played
Here we go scapegoating underwhelming review scores with the high expectations by putting the blame on "muh sjw's" rather than maybe the game actually is not the second coming of christ.
So predictable
For a game that was hyped to the sky, you'd expect red dead 2 review scores.
Meanwhile, it's almost as low as horizon zero dawn, the first open world game from guerilla
If that's the comparison I can live with that.
I liked HZD more than RDR2!
And yet we are sitting around a 90 aggregate, kind of wild.
No talk about performance? Really??
With an RTX 2080, i9-9900K, and installed on a SATA SSD, with DLSS enabled on Quality mode on the High graphics preset (no ray-tracing), I maintain a variable 60-80 fps at 2560x1440, dipping lowest when driving through particularly reflection-heavy parts of town. With DLSS off, the frame window drops to 40-50 fps. Ray-tracing options are particularly resource intensive, so I just kept them off. The framerate hit wasn't worth the fancy lighting, nice as it looks on a rainy day or in a neon-lit club especially. Someday. Either way, a newer card will go a long way in Cyberpunk 2077, though players still hanging in at 1080p should do fine with older hardware.
And the fact that it is another typical open world gameLet me know when it's not retards screeching about how they wanted trans representation but not THAT trans representation in a dystopian fucking cyberpunk game.
So far the only valid criticism seems to be bugs, which happen in every open world game, and will be patched.
gotta take into account who reviewed it. Cant take that person serious after her days gone review
I dont get it, you are a god dam reviewer, you know it wil get patched out just like the witcher. Why weigh it in your review? when I read the ign conclusion it sounds like a 10 but they gave it a 9
Let me know when it's not retards screeching about how they wanted trans representation but not THAT trans representation in a dystopian fucking cyberpunk game.
So far the only valid criticism seems to be bugs, which happen in every open world game, and will be patched.
gotta take into account who reviewed it. Cant take that person serious after her days gone review
https://imgsli.com/MzIzMDg from PC Games Hardware
Holy moly, even without looking for RT Reflections, the difference with RTX is staggering. Everything looks much more grounded and believable.
WaPo games reporter:
Gene Park said:And for years, trans activists have shone a light on why its depiction and seemingly willful ignorance on gender can create damage for a marginalized community, even within the game’s context of capitalism objectifying humanity for gain. In its narrative, CDPR chose adherence to a known and problematic formula over upending the cyberpunk genre. This might be an insurmountable hurdle for some — and understandably so.
Just ban all Cyberpunk threads and from now on if X game affects X minority group, said minority group should have veto power on everything related to that game here (general discussion, OT, review thread, etc) or even put them in charge of the OT if they want to.
The Witcher 3 was a game with a women problem that proudly boasted racism as a selling point in one of its trailers. Cyberpunk is par for the course for CDPR.
So no only is there transphobia in cyberpunk there's also blatant mysogony too lol.
the witcher series featured
like.......... i do like tw3 but none of this is new or shocking :/
- zero (0) characters of colour in the base game, unless you count a brown-skinned succubus )))
- one (1) crossdressing/gender nonconforming character who was treated like a joke with Geralt making funny shocked faces
- two (2) gay characters, one of who was a minor character with a tragic bury your gays story and the other whose gayness was completely optional
- god knows how many sexualised women written in an extremely misogynistic way and an entire abuse apologism questline
You review what you got, not what it might be in the future.from the ign review: ''It’s a shame that frustratingly frequent bugs can occasionally kill an otherwise well-set mood, ''
I dont get it, you are a god dam reviewer, you know it wil get patched out just like the witcher. Why weigh it in your review? when I read the ign conclusion it sounds like a 10 but they gave it a 9
It has AO and GI, and a very well one at that. It's just hard to have perfect lighting in a full open world title using pre-baked light maps and that is where Raytracing excels.Plus the RTX version has more man-babies, with is a positive.
I agree but I think its down to the RTX off images having no ambient occlusion/global illumination. I wonder why that is, it looks like shit imo.
I mean... Have you seen the polygon review? God dam, it talks 90% about trans shit and then give it a low score..It's not much that but more so the credibility, or in this case the lack thereof, of the reviewer in question. If someone spends their career either nitpicking over the dumbest shit like too much water or allowing their political views cloud what should be an overall impartial journalistic look at a product, then I'm going to take their opinion on said product with a grain of salt.
yea alright, thats fair enough. in that case its on cdpr. I am pretty sure they rushed it out now just before the holidays to satisfy their investors. and it backfiresYou review what you got, not what it might be in the future.
No video review from Gamespot?
It’s growingPerspective.
I'm considering coming back here full-time
As someone who posts also on Resetera, it's absolutely fucking absurd their handling of their allowing people to talk about this game, and I'm pro-trans broadly in my politics
Beyond parody, childish and screamingly obtuse to the point I'm considering coming back here full-time
We have a Trumper. I'm calling Era Nazi hotline as we speak.As someone who posts also on Resetera, it's absolutely fucking absurd their handling of their allowing people to talk about this game, and I'm pro-trans broadly in my politics
Beyond parody, childish and screamingly obtuse to the point I'm considering coming back here full-time
Wow, there really is a day and night difference. Seems upgrading to 3070 at the last moment was a sensible decision.https://imgsli.com/MzIzMDg from PC Games Hardware
Holy moly, even without looking for RT Reflections, the difference with RTX is staggering. Everything looks much more grounded and believable.
https://imgsli.com/MzIzMDg from PC Games Hardware
Holy moly, even without looking for RT Reflections, the difference with RTX is staggering. Everything looks much more grounded and believable.
As someone who posts also on Resetera, it's absolutely fucking absurd their handling of their allowing people to talk about this game, and I'm pro-trans broadly in my politics
Beyond parody, childish and screamingly obtuse to the point I'm considering coming back here full-time
As someone who posts also on Resetera, it's absolutely fucking absurd their handling of their allowing people to talk about this game, and I'm pro-trans broadly in my politics
Beyond parody, childish and screamingly obtuse to the point I'm considering coming back here full-time
The funny thing is, these odd 7/10 or 70 scores are the only thing bringing the entire score down. 2-3 reviewers using their review as a soapbox to talk about representation in the game or how they designed bad character to use and that hurt them throughout the entire game.
Cant remember where it was informed that the footage was provided by Sony, since I've watched pretty much every TLOU 2 review in existence. But yeah, they could use only the footage provided to them, I'm certain.I don't think so. Pretty sure they just weren't allowed to show footage from the second part of the game for obvious spoiler related reasons. At least the IGN review doesn't say anything about footage provided by Sony. This seems more like a "please don't show the bugs" reason.
As someone who posts also on Resetera, it's absolutely fucking absurd their handling of their allowing people to talk about this game, and I'm pro-trans broadly in my politics
Beyond parody, childish and screamingly obtuse to the point I'm considering coming back here full-time
So glad that i can't even notice the difference in that slider comparison, i'm gonna disable every rtx stuff in the hope of running this thing at 1440p60 with my rig...Plus the RTX version has more man-babies, with is a positive.
I agree but I think its down to the RTX off images having no ambient occlusion/global illumination. I wonder why that is, it looks like shit imo.