Maybe you shouldn't be arguing the rulebook in public. Its kind of pot and kettle at this point if we want to argue about meta things.
This isn't even kindof true
Maybe you shouldn't be arguing the rulebook in public. Its kind of pot and kettle at this point if we want to argue about meta things.
This post has gone a long way towards lessening my suspicions of Royal as it doesn't seem like an interaction that would occur between two scum. This in turn has made me feel better about Ty again as his strong insistence not to vote for Royal concerned me.
I noticed that AB only really mentioned/interacted with a handful of people. I really don't know how to derive information from that though.
It's just another tool.I don't think you could police doing research on players even if you wanted to, but the act of quoting posts from other threads and egging people to go read is digging for stuff that's not relevant to the game.
Even if it's not against the rules, it's desperate reaching to throw someone under the bus. Huge red flag.
Let's not go that far. You're one of my town reads so I'd much prefer if you kept up the activity from the last day phase.It wasn't, but who's gonna keep listening after the mod weighed in? I might as well not play today
I guess my thinking is if they were on the same team they wouldn't miscommunicate and confuse each other. I mean Royal completely misinterpreted the situation which I wouldn't expect between two people speaking elsewhere. Could it have been manufactured? Maybe, I mean that would be a step past the coordinating scum have done in any of my past games but I'm sure it's happened. If you want to frame it in that context it's interesting that both Royal and AB went from non-entities to posting a fair amount at day end. Then again they would be dinged just as hard if they had continued to not bother to participate.I'm reading this and I'm not sure why that post lessens suspicion on Royal, just because he misunderstood a point that AB was trying to make? I'm still chewing on how I feel about Royal after his increased activity at day end and I haven't really gone back to see AB interactions yet but I could easily flip this and say, why did the interaction even happen in the first place? Seems like such a useless thing to point out and scum sometimes goes out of their way to interact with teammates publicly because a lot of rookie mistakes come from ignoring teammates in public.
I'm reading this and I'm not sure why that post lessens suspicion on Royal, just because he misunderstood a point that AB was trying to make? I'm still chewing on how I feel about Royal after his increased activity at day end and I haven't really gone back to see AB interactions yet but I could easily flip this and say, why did the interaction even happen in the first place? Seems like such a useless thing to point out and scum sometimes goes out of their way to interact with teammates publicly because a lot of rookie mistakes come from ignoring teammates in public.
Scum_1 said:Blah
Scum_2 said:I hate youScum_1 said:Blah
And then they go back to ignoring each other.Scum_1 said:I hate you tooScum_2 said:I hate you
I guess my thinking is if they were on the same team they wouldn't miscommunicate and confuse each other. I mean Royal completely misinterpreted the situation which I wouldn't expect between two people speaking elsewhere. Could it have been manufactured? Maybe, I mean that would be a step past the coordinating scum have done in any of my past games but I'm sure it's happened. If you want to frame it in that context it's interesting that both Royal and AB went from non-entities to posting a fair amount at day end. Then again they would be dinged just as hard if they had continued to not bother to participate.
Well while you two hammer each other over the semantics of what is and isn't appropriate I'm going to move my focus elsewhere.
VOTE: OceanicAir
Your contributions day one were minimal at best. Your claimed FA would be fairly convenient for scum to discourage votes in their direction. Those two things make me skeptical of your alignment.
I'm also skeptical of Blarg, kingkitty, Bronx, and Stan.
I've tried going back and looking through AbsolutBro's posts to try and discern more from them but didn't come away with much.
This post has gone a long way towards lessening my suspicions of Royal as it doesn't seem like an interaction that would occur between two scum. This in turn has made me feel better about Ty again as his strong insistence not to vote for Royal concerned me.
I noticed that AB only really mentioned/interacted with a handful of people. I really don't know how to derive information from that though.
Your FA inherently makes it a risky proposal to even have you in the running at day end. Just look at the last phase, had you been in that situation when there's uncertainty and votes moving frequently your FA would have been a big concern and could've swayed people away from voting you still.Those reasons are certainly something, if you're hoping for me to become a high volume poster then you'll be waiting for a while. And this nonsense about my FA discouraging votes is kinda silly. All it means is that I can't end the day with the second most votes, nothing is stopping anybody for voting me. For about 99% of people that play mafia, having the second most votes at the end of the day means absolutely nothing.
So if by day end you guys want me dead give me the most votes like you would do any other person, otherwise leave me out of the top two.
Bronx-Man - Lean suspicious. The quick finger pointing after the Terra lynch was a little too overeager. He gets 3 burnt donuts.
VOTE: StarSketch
I'll remember this the next time Splinter or Cabot post some ol' bullshit about one of my votes and no one calls them out for it.
I'll remember this the next time Splinter or Cabot post some ol' bullshit about one of my votes and no one calls them out for it.
As for the game state, the Sorian/Karkador bickering feels like play styles are just clashing. It almost reminds me of Batman, but I town read both players here so far. More so Sorian I think, mostly since he has seemed to not dwell on FAs as much, but I say that without going back and rereading so dont take it as gospel or anything.
Bronx has played like Bronx. Problem for me is that Bronx seems to play the same as town, scum or dirty neutral ascetic serial killer.
Nin has been gambiting, but why? I guess we will find out at some point.
Ty4on I town read, though I somewhat selfishly do not like him co-opting my Faddy accusation. Still, his posts have been pretty detailed and hunting.
Huh, had not thought of it that way. Fair point.
Wow. That is some quality shade.
Here, let me get that quote for you:
Ooh, so scummy. "It is an anti-town move for town to kill themself because if we then mislynch we have two town dead D1."
Yes, clearly I know he is town. It could not possibly be:
As long as we are throwing shade around:
How did that pro-suicide stance work out for town?
Also,
VOTE: nin1000
I think there is something here and nin actually needs to get to speaking his mind as opposed to asking weak questions anyway.
I need to reread Splinter too at some point. I think he was taking a very shotgun approach but maybe there was something more targeted there, the shade at AB was more focused than I remember.
its like this is your first time watching a death game story, there always has to be an immediate sacrifice to prove the consequences of breaking the rules.
really gotta get the tension going so that everyone has an excuse for their terrible decision making.
c'mon man learn the tropes.
Damn, Faddy was my highest scum read. This leaves Sorian, Natiko, RoyalFlush, & Kitty as the only reads I got leaning scum.
splinter is dead? good riddance
*snip*
*snip*
Blarg - Lean unsure. Looking back, it is pretty interesting that of all people, Blarg is the one who gets the most flamboyant FA (assuming his behavior is related to an FA). No one else seems to be doing anything nearly bizarre. The closest would be Faddy's poem, and that was a complete fake. Having Blarg connected to this type of FA feels too perfect. So I guess a little part of my brain thinks this might just be a big ole lie/bold gambit. Maybe I'm just being unfair to Blarg!
*snip*
This topic doesn't interest me anymore Kark, it's fairly clear you aren't scum. That you may still just be a second neutral there to counter the survivor isn't really a point I care about today. You presumably think I am scum, convince the otherswhile I figure out what I'm doing today (which will most likely end up being later tonight).
meaning: I have to kill you Tonight, Kark
I'll even let you vote yourself out
Blarg, I find it hard to believe a word you're saying. Why would your forbidden action be to specifically not vote on a scum-aligned player?
*snip*
*snip*
And how would that even tie into your "communication issues" on the previous Day phase (unless that was just a blatant lie, too).
*snip*
*snip*
And what?
*snip*
*looks at Terra's alignment*
You'll figure it out, I BELIEVE in you
He's implying he did in fact copy Faddy like I mentioned earlier. Faddy's FA requires Kark to die prior to game end. Blarg is literally calling his shot.Oh woops, I must have read that as absolutbro for some reason. I'll blame that on it being early.
I'm bad at figuring things out, but it does sound like a threat from someone with a killing ability.
But you're also implying that there's another neutral (I guess?) who wants to set things on fire. A lot going on here, man.
*snip*
But you're also implying that there's another neutral (I guess?) who wants to set things on fire. A lot going on here, man.
He's implying he did in fact copy Faddy like I mentioned earlier. Faddy's FA requires Kark to die prior to game end. Blarg is literally calling his shot.
Leaving Blarg alive with the claimed ability to kill every night does seem like a potentially bad choice. He needs to be dealt with eventually if that's true, but whether he's the best choice I'm not sure. That depends on whether we think he's telling the truth and whether we think Kark is telling the truth.But... then doesn't that mean that we have today's lynch target?
And if that was actually his role, I find it hard to believe that he started off aligned with town in the first place, and that he might have been neutral to start with. Are we supposed to believe there are 3 neutral players in play here (potentially 4, if Karkador's one of 'em)?
Blarg is literally calling his shot.
Leaving Blarg alive with the claimed ability to kill every night does seem like a potentially bad choice. He needs to be dealt with eventually if that's true, but whether he's the best choice I'm not sure. That depends on whether we think he's telling the truth and whether we think Kark is telling the truth.
Leaving Blarg alive with the claimed ability to kill every night does seem like a potentially bad choice. He needs to be dealt with eventually if that's true, but whether he's the best choice I'm not sure. That depends on whether we think he's telling the truth and whether we think Kark is telling the truth.
Faddy's ability was one-shot, so he could only kill once and investigate a role once.
I mean, our win condition explicitly tells us to eliminate "all threats" to Town, and I'm pretty sure lynching neutrals would be part of that. Which means it'd be just as good as lynching scum right now, I don't see why we'd have to delay killing him.
Weird thing for Blarg to imply, though, considering this.
alright, first off, on behalf of good taste I'd like to apologize for the overt corniness that I put on display during Yesterday's end
secondly, the other part of my "FA" was not being allowed to vote against Terra; hence, after his tragic untimely demise Yesterday, my vote experiment to see if I would still die with him already dead
I did not
CONCLUSION: If one of the subjects of your Forbidden Action is already dead, you will no longer die from commiting that aspect of your Forbidden Action.
also, yeah RIP
thirdly, something something mumble cough
I don't like this clearance twosome you got going on there
But... then doesn't that mean that we have today's lynch target?
And if that was actually his role, I find it hard to believe that he started off aligned with town in the first place, and that he might have been neutral to start with. Are we supposed to believe there are 3 neutral players in play here (potentially 4, if Karkador's one of 'em)?
I don't believe you about your original FA in the least. Your copycat thing is at least a tiny bit believable but with the rest of the nonsense, comes with too much baggage and coincidence.
It doesn't really matter what you like. It's not really logical at all for the forbidden action remover to be scum.
AB: Man, I have a stipulation that I can't give you all info from my PR.
FA Remover: No big deal bro, I got you.
So if Kark is going to get the benefit of the role claim that he gets the rest of the clear as well. He could be lying but with the cockiness with which he roleclaimed, the claim of having no FA which could still be a lie but is a very convenient lie that I could see this role claiming, and no counter claim, I fine him lying on his role to be unlikely.