Only if you play games though, for any sort of workload stuff the 7800x3d is far from the best. Additionally, as I said in a previous thread, the results are far, far closer and the performance difference for gaming becomes irrelevant if you game at 1440p or 4k. Once you go to higher resolutions and settings most new CPUs are going to perform basically equally, but that obviously is why they aren't benchmarked that way.
Arrow lake is definitely a disappointment for gaming performance, but the power efficiency gains are notable, and I think this paves the way for future generations to be far more competitive. IIRC the reason why arrow lake's performance is so disappointing is due to last minute cuts to the ring bus because of technical problems. I think eliminating hyperthreading also hurts gaming performance a lot in some titles.
What really matters with CPUs at this point is value, you just have to pick whatever works best within your budget, this benchmark warrioring bullshit people do in threads/discussions to humiliate Intel or AMD is rediculous because for gaming, it never actually reflects reality, because nobody is just going to play at 1080p with a 4090 (which is what TPU used btw) and 7800x3d and nobody is also going to play games at low settings 720p either. For real world use, it barely matters.