Its not a bad game. Just not goty material.
So 2020 games with a massive graphical upgrades are not allowed, but 2022 games with some new clouds are?
So you haven't played it.
Yea.
I have the PC version of the winners(ignorance is bliss)
Of course I have played it. It looks identical to the base game with a really good new volumetric cloud system that really makes flying and the skybox look way better. Down on the ground things are about the same though. Characters, textures, foliage, resolution, and GI haven't changed at all. The scale of the final boss is more impressive as well.
DF as a source? Keep trying.
You're complaining about the lack of inclusion of an older game where the new cloud rendering is the (only new) key advancement.
Versus a game that got a complete path traced rendering pipeline visual overhaul(and still didn't come #1 mind you).
See above Avatar doesn't look better.
The whole point of my posts are they can't be taken seriousWhat topic are you posting in right now?
this will be more evident when all places awards are given and the spins will be....
And? was the DLC released in 2023? thats all that should matter rather than we cant include it because it doesnt feature path tracing, they are making up the rules as they go along. Either include DLC or dont but dont make up rules as to why one should be included and one shouldnt (the final boss alone in Burning Shores couldnt be done in the original game so its not just cloud rendering)
You're complaining about the lack of inclusion of an older game where the new cloud rendering is the (only new) key advancement.
Versus a game that got a complete path traced rendering pipeline visual overhaul(and still didn't come #1 mind you).
Not on your PC.
Well, I love that game, but I definitely notice some visual jank while I'm playing it. I'm kind of shocked it made the list.
Not on your PC.
I can't ignore you just yet.
Let's hope you been good and Santa brings you what's needed for pcmr.
The puddles alone are gorgeous plus it has good foliage. I get Crysis 3(PC) vibes.
Serious question, what places? Am I missing a number of sites that make a best looking game of the year awards somewhere?The whole point of my posts are they can't be taken serious
Well every awards video is subjective, and 'I' find it hard to agree with their decision to not include Burning Shores but include Cyberpunk. Its VERY simple, either include DLC or don't include DLC. They needlessly complicated it by having subjective criteria as to why it should be included or not (and the cynic in me says they didn't want Horizon to win it two years in a row).
I don't think any/many are doing it. Gamespot / IGN didn't have best graphics categories this year.
I have put over 60 hours into it so far, and i like it a lot. It also has MC in the 70's, its hardly a badly reviewed game.
Does that matter though? I mean, its their criteria, they can do whatever they like, but to me its simple, include DLC or don't include DLC.
No, my argument is that if they aren't including DLC in their top 10 (and only giving them honourable mentions) then Cyberpunk shouldn't be there either. Either include both (they are both top notch games graphically and both were released this year) or include neither.You keep bringing up 'include DLC or not', they did, it was part of their honorable mentions. And you've already said that you think they didn't want it to win two years in a row, so you wouldn't have been satisfied even if it was their number two or three pick.
yep. neither game should be included. they even said that the asset quality looks last gen compared to other games on their list and then decided to ignore it and put it at number 3 anyway.
i dont like ubisofts games. i think the last one i truly liked was AC Origin, before that AC Unity and before that Far Cry 3 litearlly 11 years ago.
The majority of places that give awards. Most should be available by sometime in January and the DICE awards sometime in 2024.
Yes I do and they weren't the only ones who did.
Translation: you don't agree and now are mentioning performance as a metric.
HAir tech in cutscenes not real time gameplayWhy are you always so salty bro. What did you want to win?
True there was great hair tech in Spiderman 2
I see your point now.
I didn't know what to expect out of this game. I got it for $10 on gamepass and it plays like doom with sorcery instead so far. Graphics I thought were alright I think the art style has more to do with it not getting any mentions.
