What kind of question is this....??
Do you not understand how much content focusing on "all the properties" would entail? They own way too much stuff to do that even remotely.
What kind of question is this....??
They have been slowly adding figures from their older properties, like Mulan, Stitch, Fantasia, etc. But they are always single figures. It is a bigger risk to release more figures from the same old franchise and even risker to realease playsets. That is way we may never see an Aladdin playset sadly.
This doesn't really effect me since I don't know anyone else who collects these but when you put a figure on the base it says it unlocks the character permanently. Does it mean for the session or properly permanently forever like it sounds? because that seems surprising and open to abuse by people lending each other characters.
My eight years old only knows Aladdin from the theme parks. Robin Hood from the non Disney animations (so no Fox), Lion King a little (I am sure the new animation will help when aired here). Dumbo, Pinocchio, Rescue Rangers? Ah. And that is the movies side. I wnted some 90s cartoons too.
I like to think a Kingdom Hearts playset could amend for lack of playsets for certain properties. A KH playset for example could have an Agrabah, Land of Dragons, Halloween Town, & Arendelle as worlds with Aladdin/Jasmine/Mulan/Jack Skellington/Elsa/Anna crossover coins.
Takeover is a lot of fun, I just wish it were longer.
It would be nice if something like Takeover is built into future Disney Infinity games. Maybe even with a bit of platforming thrown in so it's not just top-down brawling the whole time?
There's a solid base there they could build a really compelling any-figure experience out of.
I like to think a Kingdom Hearts playset could amend for lack of playsets for certain properties. A KH playset for example could have an Agrabah, Land of Dragons, Halloween Town, & Arendelle as worlds with Aladdin/Jasmine/Mulan/Jack Skellington/Elsa/Anna crossover coins.
They could have all of those without having to give Square a penny on their own and happily say fuck Kingdom Hearts...
I am not saying that you will not see some kind of tie to KH in the future, most likely a figure of some sort
Disney owns Kingdom Hearts though. Square-Enix is the one paying them to use the licence whenever they make those games.
I don't think we'll see a KH playset, but it's totally possible they'll do a Sora figure or something like that to tie into the KH3 release marketing-wise. Maybe costume discs for Donald and (the inevitably released) Goofy? Who knows.
Thinking of picking this up for me and my other half. We also have children in the house, who although don't generally game, I think they perhaps might with this.
She's absolutely mad on Marvel, and we also both really like Star Wars. I did consider the LEGO Marvel games, but to be honest I'm more than a little burnt out on the LEGO formula, and I think she would enjoy the actual physical figures.
I know absolutely nothing about the game though. The whole Infinity thing has totally passed me by. It looks like a fun game and I usually admire the figures when I'm in a game shop, but I've no idea what the actual game is. There are campaigns, right? Is it local multiplayer, and if so, co-operative or competitive? Are the figures meaningful in their usage (compared to say, Amiibo) and are the starter packs good value in terms of content? I think I'd likely need the starter pack, The Force Awakens pack, Marvel Battlegrounds and an Iron Man (her favourite) figure to get started.. but I'm not really sure what any of that means in terms of value.
Basically, I think I need a total dummies guide overview! Reviews of the game largely assume you have some grasp of what's going on.
There goes our Scarlet Witch :/
EDIT: Ugh, I guess this means no Peter Pan?
What the hell??????
And what does it means for the figures/playsets that should have been out in a month?
Blackburn said in a statement that the Alice figures and Dory playset are still coming out but that's it. They're closing up shop after that.
So that's a no on Peter Pan, then? Bummer.
Limiting all the universes to their own spaces and not having a epic story a la Skylanders bit them in the ass.
Sure sounds like it. Just Alice and Dory which I personally don't care about. I guess I'm done.
I'll still play 3.0 as long as it still works as I love those Star Wars playsets. Hopefully it'll work without servers or in a perfect world, get patched.
No, in a perfect world they'd patch it and open up all the playsets and characters.
It began with Pixar & Johnny Depp, it ends with Pixar & Johnny Depp.
But they had Disney, Marvel and Star Wars and it should have printed money. Having restrictions about universes and limiting story potential was likely one of a whole truckload of factors in this dying.
But it sounds as though they're pretty much getting out of console development anyways, licensing their IPs to others. I imagine if that weren't the case, Infinity would live on. Sad about the job losses as well....
Yup - said it before and will say it again, they needed to release the chains and let people just play. Not "These characters work here, and these here, and these nowhere useful again since we didn't bring the playsets forward."
Might not have saved it, but I'd have bought more figures off-clearance if I could do more with them.
I guess now is as good a time as any to post the memorial wall of shame:
Ha! I'm third! I think this is the first time I've made a GAF wall of shame.
Me neither. I kinda knocked it out of the park on this one too.