trueCrysis 1 still has better physics interactions than most games which is a tragedy imo.
Didn't Crysis 3 introduce light probe based realtime global illumination?
This is a good example of them discussing the use of a combination of Screen Space Reflections and Cube Maps (10 minute mark), which was obviously the standard for real time reflections that was established that generation after Crysis 3 was released:
This is a good example of them discussing the use of a combination of Screen Space Reflections and Cube Maps (10 minute mark), which was obviously the standard for real time reflections that was established that generation after Crysis 3 was released (also a great video to learn how to deconstruct graphics technology and learn terminology lol):
So yes I'd agree it was the first legitimate example of 8th Generation tech (there's a few things Crysis 3 that basically no games do as well, like real time water caustics which still looks awesome). Again, important to note, this is all pre-PS4/Xbox One, on a game that was built with the Xbox 360 and PS3 in mind, with a smaller development studio of apparently just around 100 people and a budget of 66 million.
Far Cry 3 on PC had it, the lighting solution was developed by Massive.Didn't Crysis 3 introduce light probe based realtime global illumination?
It was also boring af.Crysis 1 still has better physics interactions than most games which is a tragedy imo.
Only the 360 versions as far as I know.Whoa. I didn’t know the Crysis games were on Game Pass. I’m definitely gonna dive into them next weekend. Those games were so awesome.
Either OP is trying as hard as possible to get a free Collectors Edition of some game, or he has had a stroke.
It's a bot or a previously banned poster is fucking with us.
I see no other logical alternatives.
Crysis 1 still has better physics interactions than most games which is a tragedy imo.
It was also boring af.
The gameplay of the entire industry didn’t really move forward since the PS360 era.NeXt gen visual , past gen gameplay
Has FEAR been bested for the way the enemies react to shots and there AI?Crysis 1 still has better physics interactions than most games which is a tragedy imo.
Arguably by Killzone 2, only to never be seen again in the subsequent games.Has FEAR been bested for the way the enemies react to shots and there AI?
Arkham Knight came out in 2015Honestly, I always thought so. It took until like 2016 for games to come out that definitely looked better. Otherwise, the maxed out PC version blew everything out the water in 2013 and was in contention for best looking game for a number of years.
Killzone 2 and S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Shadow of Chernobyl had advanced AI for their time.Has FEAR been bested for the way the enemies react to shots and there AI?
Didn’t impress me more than Crysis 3. One thing I never liked about the Arkham games is the weird plastic look. This was a problem with UE3.Arkham Knight came out in 2015
Either OP is trying as hard as possible to get a free Collectors Edition of some game, or he has had a stroke.
New to HighPoly threads i guess?It's a bot or a previously banned poster is fucking with us.
I see no other logical alternatives.
I feel 2013 was the year of GI in general, Naughty Dog managed to implement fully dynamic bounce light on PS3 that year.Didn't Crysis 3 introduce light probe based realtime global illumination?
And The Order 1886 which despite criticism of the black bars the game looked like CGI.Arkham Knight came out in 2015
Yeah, that was the game for me. Until RDR2 it also sported the best PBR, more impressive than the also superb Assassin's Creed Unity implementation imo.And The Order 1886 which despite criticism of the black bars the game looked like CGI.
And looks nowhere near as good as Crysis 3 so who cares?And The Order 1886 which despite criticism of the black bars the game looked like CGI.
Clearly you care, since you needed to remind folks that it "looks nowhere near as good" as a game he made no comparisons to.And looks nowhere near as good as Crysis 3 so who cares?
Huh, yes he did.Clearly you care, since you needed to remind folks that it "looks nowhere near as good" as a game he made no comparisons to.
He said it looked CGI, which you must be admitting then that Crysis 3 did not.Huh, yes he did.
I said no game definitively surpassed Crysis 3 until 2016. A poster replied that Arkham Knight came out in 2015 with the implication that it was on par or above Crysis 3. The other poster then threw in The Order 1886 among said games.
CG from what year? 1999? Sure lol.He said it looked CGI, which you must be admitting then that Crysis 3 did not.![]()
I’m sure The Order 1886 looked great. I just couldn’t see it behind all those layers of post-processing. Battlefield 4? Killzone Shadow Fall? You best be trolling.In reality, even in 2013, there were games that were comparable. Battlefield 4, Killzone: Shadow Fall, Metro: Last Light, and Ryse: Son of Rome were also top contenders for visuals of that year. It's fine if you preferred Crysis 3, but it doesn't mean that no other games could compete. And that was 2013. The Order was two years later and was called the best looking game of that year by plenty who witnessed it.