• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Dolly the (cloned) Sheep was introduced to the world 20 years ago

Status
Not open for further replies.

WedgeX

Banned
Twenty years ago was 1997, by the by.

Courtesy Pew Research Center.

Pew said:
On the anniversary of Dolly's unveiling, here are five noteworthy findings about cloning and public opinion:

1 No one has ever cloned a human being, though scientists have cloned animals other than Dolly, including dogs, pigs, cows, horses and cats. Part of the reason is that cloning can introduce profound genetic errors, which can result in early and painful death. At the same time, labs in a variety of countries have successfully cloned human embryos for the purpose of producing stem cells that can be used in medical therapies.


2 Eight-in-ten American adults (81%) say cloning a human being is not morally acceptable, according to a May 2016 Gallup poll. There has been overwhelming opposition to human cloning since 2001. Just 13% of adults in 2016 say cloning is morally acceptable.

3 Americans are divided as to whether humans will be cloned in the near future. In a 2010 Pew Research Center survey, 48% of adults said that a human being would definitely or probably be cloned by 2050, compared with 49% who said such an event would not happen.

4 The public is divided about the prospect of using cloning to bring back to life species of animals that are currently extinct, such as the carrier pigeon or even the woolly mammoth. While bringing back dinosaurs, à la Jurassic Park, might not possible due to the fact that dinosaurs have been dead for tens of millions of years, scientists could conceivably use fresher tissue samples to bring back more recently extinct species. In a 2013 Pew Research Center poll, half of all adults surveyed (50%) said that by 2050 researchers will be able to use cloning to bring back extinct species, with 48% predicting such a development won't occur.

5 Fewer Americans are concerned with cloning animals than with the prospect of cloning humans, according to the same 2016 Gallup survey. Still, a majority of adults (60%) say cloning animals like Dolly is morally wrong, compared with 34% who say it's morally acceptable. Since 2001, there has been little to no change in these numbers.

Omgdqlv.jpg


budQZ4p.jpg
 
4 The public is divided about the prospect of using cloning to bring back to life species of animals that are currently extinct, such as the carrier pigeon or even the woolly mammoth. While bringing back dinosaurs, à la Jurassic Park, might not possible due to the fact that dinosaurs have been dead for tens of millions of years, scientists could conceivably use fresher tissue samples to bring back more recently extinct species. In a 2013 Pew Research Center poll, half of all adults surveyed (50%) said that by 2050 researchers will be able to use cloning to bring back extinct species, with 48% predicting such a development won’t occur.

RG0BS1U.gif
 

ColdPizza

Banned
So what happened to Dolly? Normal lifespan or... ?

died feb 14, 2003

she died young

The type of lung disease Dolly developed is most common in older sheep. And in January 2002, it was revealed that Dolly had developed arthritis prematurely. She was cloned using a cell taken from a healthy six-year-old sheep, and was born on 5 July 1996 at the Roslin Institute, Edinburgh, Scotland.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3393-dolly-the-sheep-dies-young/
 

Boem

Member

For some reason I still remember this picture as if it was yesterday.

Dolly was so cool to me back then. Felt like we were living in the future. It was amazing how big the discussion surrounding that was, like everyone in the world was discussing the philosophical implications of a deep scifi novel at the same time. Really fun stuff to a nerdy guy like me back then.
 
5 Fewer Americans are concerned with cloning animals than with the prospect of cloning humans, according to the same 2016 Gallup survey. Still, a majority of adults (60%) say cloning animals like Dolly is morally wrong, compared with 34% who say it’s morally acceptable. Since 2001, there has been little to no change in these numbers.
I'm not surprised so many people have problems with cloning humans, but am surprised it remains so high for animals. Considering most of us, y'know, are cool with them being killed for our consumption.
 

Boem

Member
I'm kinda surprised we don't considering there have been frozen remains found of them.

Jeff Goldblum put a stop to it.

appifiying-wordpress-practical-tips-for-using-wordpress-as-an-application-platform-15-638.jpg


This reminds me that the timing of Jurassic Park and Dolly is really interesting. Cloning was definitely much more on the forefront of the public conciousness at the time, and definitely formed a large part of what got people interested in the movie. That's much less the case these days, where it's (for the majority of the audience) much more about just the dinosaurs, the theme park and the adventure/action scenes. Which was a part of it back then too of course, but that cloning theme isn't nearly as noteworthy and topical now as it was back then.
 
Aren't identical twins essentially clones?
There's no weirdness about it. We're all just slight variations of meats in skins. No souls. Some animals give birth to their full genetic clones, naturally.

It's a neat thing to explore. The morally questionable part of cloning anything is that it would likely be tested in a lab environment, possibly owned by a corporation.

Imagine if we made clones of history's most promising scientists. Then we just released them into 'the wild' and let them live without any further control or study. Almost like a desperate seeding attempt to inject some 'intelligent genes' into our population pool.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom