That's not how publishing works. Microsoft published Mass Effect, then those rights moved to EA after the purchase of Bioware.They already have them. Sony just has eternal publishing rights. Activision can do what they please with them.
That's not how publishing works. Microsoft published Mass Effect, then those rights moved to EA after the purchase of Bioware.
activision at e3;
'we heard your pleas, so we're happy to announce the return of crash bandicoot!'
The joke would be that Sony are not involved with the gameI guess I'm missing the joke
That's not how publishing works. Microsoft published Mass Effect, then those rights moved to EA after the purchase of Bioware.
activision at e3;
'we heard your pleas, so we're happy to announce the return of crash bandicoot!'
The joke would be that Sony are not involved with the game
Would Sony really make a difference?
Would Sony really make a difference?
activision at e3;
'we heard your pleas, so we're happy to announce the return of crash bandicoot!'
Considering Mark Cerny had a big part in the original games, yeah probably.
He explicitedly said its not Crash Bandicoot. I feel like those who wants him to return, are having selective reading.
A fate worse than death.Honestly surprised Crash isn't a Skylander.
what's all this "monday" talk?
Perhaps he was called into re-record.
I have a theory. However no one will able to talk about right now, even when it gets to Monday I don't see how.
So Adam Boyes tweeted that Activision still owns Crash
https://twitter.com/amboyes/status/729198412592078848
Maybe that will change on Monday?
There is a Crash related embargo that is ending on monday.
Oh yeh, he can just say '' Sony is making a new Crash.'' Unless he wants to breach the NDA, yeh sure.
Because people who don't have an embargo have leaked the related information already. The information is there already in the "the case for the return of crash bandicoot" thread. I won't spoil the actual thing though (you can go looking for it in that thread if you want, it's in spoiler tags in OP), I'd have preferred not to have known. But yeah, it seems that there has been an embargo put on that info, and other circumstances surrounding it would have you believe that the embargo was put there for a reason and could lead to more info regarding a Crash comeback or an announcement very soon.How do we know this?
Maybe Crash is coming back to Sony like Spider-Man went to Marvel. Not a full rights release, but a partial one.
This is a possibility that I've been touting for a while.
maybe marvel got rights to have fantastic 4 stuff in their games and hes voicing doctor doom lol
(marvel heroes had doom prior to the marvel blackout of fantastic and xmen stuff)
Because people who don't have an embargo have leaked the related information already. The information is there already in the "the case for the return of crash bandicoot" thread. I won't spoil the actual thing though (you can go looking for it in that thread if you want, it's in spoiler tags in OP), I'd have preferred not to have known. But yeah, it seems that there has been an embargo put on that info, and other circumstances surrounding it would have you believe that the embargo was put there for a reason and could lead to more info regarding a Crash comeback or an announcement very soon.
At the very least when people naturally come across it, it's probably going to bring another wave of Crash coming back discussions.
So Adam Boyes tweeted that Activision still owns Crash
https://twitter.com/amboyes/status/729198412592078848
Maybe that will change on Monday?
I'm actually really facinated by the revisionist ''Crash was never good'' sentiment I have been seeing lately.
Yeah, who spews that bullshit anyway? Nintendo diehards?
I'm actually really facinated by the revisionist ''Crash was never good'' sentiment I have been seeing lately.
Yeah, who spews that bullshit anyway? Nintendo diehards?
Maybe Boyes wasn't aware of the credits?Spoilers on Unreleased PS Exclusive releasing soon, READ AT OWN RISK:
Yeah, this is total bunk.
A: Activision was required to be credited in an art book featuring Crash Bandicoot, but NOT Uncharted 4? Which features TWO playable Crash gameplay segments, the Crash Bandicoot boxart and LOGO, and a Wumpa Fruit?
B: Bruce Straley candidly said this segment was planned last year, but said it was cut because it was "impossible" to put in due to rights and ownership by Activision. Now the game has Crash not just in one place, but SEVERAL? If the Acti ownership was what was making it "IMPOSSIBLE"... what are we to assume now that it's IN the game??
I'm actually really facinated by the revisionist ''Crash was never good'' sentiment I have been seeing lately.
Maybe Boyes wasn't aware of the credits?
It would make sense in a way. He is in charge of the Third Party Division and there's dozens of divisions at Sony Interactive but this would be the work of First Party since Uncharted is a Sony IP, correct?
But Yoshida didn't know about the shirt and he's first party. Someone MUST know something about this, right?
Welp. Nevermind.
http://neocrash.deviantart.com/art/LexLang-No-Crash-607433602?ga_submit_new=10%3A1462572425
although I will take the moment here to ask why the fuck you would upload something like this to DEVIANT ART
EDIT: Actual picture
Not even them neccessarily. When the official PSBlog held the best PS1 games poll and 2 of the 4 winners were Crash games people in places were really salty. Not just cause they thought that some other games were better but apparently because Crash was trash.
I especially find this to be wrong because one thing I remember about Crash is that it was hot shit with more casual crowd, way more than any other game that generation (perhaps minus some sports titles). And if there is one thing I know about casual gamers it's that they won't come near anything that plays clunky.
Maybe Spider-Man is a sign. Maybe Crash is coming back to Sony like Spider-Man went to Marvel. Not a full rights release, but a partial one.