Dubya is Ozymandias, wait, bear with me here…

Status
Not open for further replies.
JayDubya said:
You're worse than the people who are killing billions if you choose not to kill millions?

Given the totally messed up political climate the blame of the cause leading to billions dead can't be put on any one persons shoulders. However given you had the chance to prevent it you let billions die, their deaths are on your shoulders. Everybody dies but is not your fault is the right thing to do, rather than killing a few million to save everybody? It's an inhuman act, but it's in no way evil, evil would be to kill one man with a selfish reason or no reason at all. This is simply the same as any world leader sending his countries people to war. It's not like you're sending them to war and condoning your soldiers to rape the enemies women.
 
Spirit of Jazz said:
Given the totally messed up political climate the blame of the cause leading to billions dead can't be put on any one persons shoulders. However given you had the chance to prevent it you let billions die, their deaths are on your shoulders. Everybody dies but is not your fault is the right thing to do, rather than killing a few million to save everybody? It's an inhuman act, but it's in no way evil, evil would be to kill one man with a selfish reason or no reason at all. This is simply the same as any world leader sending his countries people to war. It's not like you're sending them to war and condoning your soldiers to rape the enemies women.
Without knowing if Veidts actions had any eventual effect on the world how can you say he's not evil?
 
Snidely Whiplash said:
Without knowing if Veidts actions had any eventual effect on the world how can you say he's not evil?

Because they had an effect, Russia pulled out of Afghanistan, you're seriously discrediting his title of the worlds smartest man. The massive international conflict which was about to irrupt was at the very least put off. He knew that these short term effects would be definite and that was enough to justify his actions, he *hoped* the peace would last hence his questions to the doc at the end of the book.
 
Spirit of Jazz said:
Because they had an effect, Russia pulled out of Afghanistan, you're seriously discrediting his title of the worlds smartest man. The massive international conflict which was about to irrupt was at the very least put off. He knew that these short term effects would be definite and that was enough to justify his actions, he *hoped* the peace would last hence his questions to the doc at the end of the book.
So giving the world some extra time is worth millions of lives? What a dick.
 
Snidely Whiplash said:
So giving the world some extra time is worth millions of lives? What a dick.

You were basing your earlier opinion on uncertainty, the only uncertainty is the amount of time the world would have which could be one year or it could be a hundred thousand. Obviously not worth the risk of... oh shit, there are no risks because they're dead either way.
 
Spirit of Jazz said:
You were basing your earlier opinion on uncertainty, the only uncertainty is the amount of time the world would have which could be one year or it could be a hundred thousand. Obviously not worth the risk of... oh shit, there are no risks because they're dead either way.
Okay, so Veidt is still an evil mass-murdering bastard. Glad we agree.:D
 
I didn't understand this topic at all, I thought it was about the poem. I still don't know what you guys are talking about.
 
Armitage said:
I didn't understand this topic at all, I thought it was about the poem. I still don't know what you guys are talking about.
watchmen-cover.jpg


It's one of the most influential comics ever written (or so I've heard).

It's a great story but IMO it's not a great superhero story.
 
Snidely Whiplash said:
Okay, so Veidt is still an evil mass-murdering bastard. Glad we agree.:D

When does evil come into saving the world in it's most literal sense? It takes more of a man to knowingly commit an evil act to save the world than a good one. Good men can commit acts of evil, evil men can commit acts of good.
 
Spirit of Jazz said:
When does evil come into saving the world in it's most literal sense? It takes more of a man to knowingly commit an evil act to save the world than a good one. Good men can commit acts of evil, evil men can commit acts of good.
How did he save the world? He possibly delayed the ending of the world by who knows how long. That's worth slaughtering millions of people for?
 
Snidely Whiplash said:
How did he save the world? He possibly delayed the ending of the world by who knows how long. That's worth slaughtering millions of people for?

Yes it is.
 
Snidely Whiplash said:
How did he save the world? He possibly delayed the ending of the world by who knows how long. That's worth slaughtering millions of people for?

You're putting off the cold war conflict as a "possibility" still, the book made sure to let the reader know the shit was about to hit the fan. Hence he saved the freaking world, a future conflict may start up, the same one could begin again, but he stopped the world ending from that chain of events.

This is getting silly now, if you can't figure out that it's worth killing a few million to stop billions from dyeing I don't know what to say.

Snidely Whiplash said:
You guys are fucking nuts.

Yeah, we're the morons any sane man would honour a belief in a flawed morality system over stopping the world from ending... Just remember if everyone dies your sense of morality means shit.
 
Spirit of Jazz said:
You're putting off the cold war conflict as a "possibility" still, the book made sure to let the reader know the shit was about to hit the fan. Hence he saved the freaking world, a future conflict may start up, the same one could begin again, but he stopped the world ending from that chain of events.

This is getting silly now, if you can't figure out that it's worth killing a few million to stop billions from dyeing I don't know what to say.
In your humble opinion it is.
 
Spirit of Jazz said:
You're putting off the cold war conflict as a "possibility" still, the book made sure to let the reader know the shit was about to hit the fan. Hence he saved the freaking world, a future conflict may start up, the same one could begin again, but he stopped the world ending from that chain of events.

This is getting silly now, if you can't figure out that it's worth killing a few million to stop billions from dyeing I don't know what to say.



Yeah, we're the morons any sane man would honour a belief in a flawed morality system over stopping the world from ending... Just remember if everyone dies your sense of morality means shit.
He stopped the world from ending? I don't remember that part in the comic? Plus everyone will die eventually so why wouldn't I keep my morals steady no matter what?
 
Gaborn said:
You're sacrificing millions of lives to POSSIBLY extend others.

Assuming Ozy's estimations were wrong, which doesn't tend to be the case, especially given what was said between the president and generals in the war room.

Snidely Whiplash said:
He stopped the world from ending? I don't remember that part in the comic? Plus everyone will die eventually so why wouldn't I keep my morals steady no matter what?

Nuclear war tends not to end all that well, the biggest fear that the world would end. If everybody going to die eventually why don't we just kill them all now so there's no need to wait? Oh, hold on, that is what you're saying.
 
Spirit of Jazz said:
Assuming Ozy's estimations were wrong, which doesn't tend to be the case, especially given what was said between the president and generals in the war room.



Nuclear war tends not to end all that well, the biggest fear that the world would end. If everybody going to die eventually why don't we just kill them all now so there's no need to wait? Oh, hold on, that is what you're saying.
:lol What the fuck are you talking about?
 
If you were in that room, and you knew the secret, would you behave like Rorschach or like Manhattan? Which is the moral option?
 
Evlar said:
If you were in that room, and you knew the secret, would you behave like Rorschach or like Manhattan? Which is the moral option?
Rorschach? How is that even a question? Veidt is a fucking murderer who deserved to be hung in the public square.
 
Snidely Whiplash said:
Rorschach? How is that even a question? Veidt is a fucking murderer who deserved to be hung in the public square.
Then YOU would be responsible for the ensuing war. Would you not? After all, you could have preserved the peace without killing or harming a single person.
 
I seriously doubt killing all those people was the only way to "buy the world some time" an therefore, the guy is bat shit insane. World's smartest man be damned, human error is still involved in the situation.
 
Evlar said:
Then YOU would be responsible for the ensuing war. Would you not? After all, you could have preserved the peace without killing or harming a single person.
No, I would be responsible for bringing a mass-murdering lunatic to justice. Whoever launched the first nuke would be responsible for the war.
 
Snidely Whiplash said:
Rorschach? How is that even a question? Veidt is a fucking murderer who deserved to be hung in the public square.


Eh, murder can be ok if you do it for the right reasons
 
Snidely Whiplash said:
No, I would be responsible for bringing a mass-murdering lunatic to justice. Whoever launched the first nuke would be responsible for the war.
You would know the implications of your actions. You response is as simplistic as Gavrilo Princip claiming he just killed one guy when he knew FULL WELL that his actions would provoke war.
 
Evlar said:
You would know the implications of your actions. You response is as simplistic as Gavrilo Princip claiming he just killed one guy when he knew FULL WELL that his actions would provoke war.
But the war might still have never happened if Veidt didn't kill all those people, and it might still have happened even though he did. There are other solutions to preventing war besides using fear tactics.
 
Snidely Whiplash said:
Where exactly? Are you fucking insane?

Snidely Whiplash said:
So giving the world some extra time is worth millions of lives? What a dick.

Snidely Whiplash said:
How did he save the world? He possibly delayed the ending of the world by who knows how long. That's worth slaughtering millions of people for?

Maybe you only understand quotes when they're bolded? My claim was that you think people might as well die sooner than later since they're going to die later anyways, the bolded parts of the quotes are what prove that ;)

Snidely Whiplash said:
No, I would be responsible for bringing a mass-murdering lunatic to justice. Whoever launched the first nuke would be responsible for the war.

There would be no "justice" as you'd have no civilised society to go back to for one. Then you're oversimplifing world relations to a retarded level. On top of that you're missing the point that Veidt's actions would stop any missiles from dropping. Surely when your morality justifies the world ending on a blame game you can see how stupid it is?

Snidely Whiplash said:
But the war might still have never happened if Veidt didn't kill all those people, and it might still have happened even though he did. There are other solutions to preventing war besides using fear tactics.

The novel says the war's going to happen, re-read the war room scene for Christ's sake, then note how the Russians pull out of Afghanistan. It's not a matter of possibility, Ozy prevent the inevitable war through his actions. He's the perfect man, he doesn't fuck up, he doesn't make miscalculations...
 
Spirit of Jazz said:
Maybe you only understand quotes when they're bolded? My claim was that you think people might as well die sooner than later since they're going to die later anyways, the bolded parts of the quotes are what prove that ;)



There would be no "justice" as you'd have no civilised society to go back to for one. Then you're oversimplifing world relations to a retarded level. On top of that you're missing the point that Veidt's actions would stop any missiles from dropping. Surely when your morality justifies the world ending on a blame game you can see how stupid it is?
No I think people should die when they fucking die, no one should murder them now and no one should murder them later. @ the bolded I think you forgot the word possibly. Veidt murdered millions of people on the possibility that it would do something, there is no certainty there.
 
Snidely Whiplash said:
No I think people should die when they fucking die, no one should murder them now and no one should murder them later. @ the bolded I think you forgot the word possibly. Veidt murdered millions of people on the possibility that it would do something, there is no certainty there.

Like I've stated over and over, I don't believe there's any possibility in it, there's certainty due to the war room scene, the hostility of the Russian, the perfect man's prediction and the person who sees time deserting a race because he sees the state of humanity. Even then it's a matter of people dying to possibly stop others from dying when they're going to die anyway, can't you see how silly that is? You're being an idealist "no one should murder them now and no one should murder them later" there's no option where nobody gets murdered, a few million are murdered or billions are, make the decision...
 
Spirit of Jazz said:
He's the perfect man, he doesn't fuck up, he doesn't make miscalculations...
well, he certainly fucked up if Rorshach managed to beat him in the end, from beyond the grave.:D
 
Spirit of Jazz said:
Like I've stated over and over, I don't believe there's any possibility in it, there's certainty due to the war room scene, the hostility of the Russian, the perfect man's prediction and the person who sees time deserting a race because he sees the state of humanity. Even then it's a matter of people dying to possibly stop others from dying when they're going to die anyway, can't you see how silly that is? You're being an idealist "no one should murder them now and no one should murder them later" there's no option where nobody gets murdered, a few million are murdered or billions are, make the decision...
So Veidt's decision stopped war forever and everyone lived happily ever after? Or did he delay this particular war for who knows how long? No matter what Veidt is still a mass murderer who deserves to die for his actions, which I'm pretty sure I've been saying all along. Veidt=Evil
 
I got the impression that there was no definitive right or wrong answer to the moral dilemma presented at the end of The Watchmen. In fact, seeing how very polarized everyone in this thread is, I'd say I'm right.
 
RegularMK said:
I got the impression that there was no definitive right or wrong answer to the moral dilemma presented at the end of The Watchmen. In fact, seeing how very polarized everyone in this thread is, I'd say I'm right.


Yeah, I kinda thought that was the whole point. Even "god" in the shape of Dr. Manhattan doesn't really know how to judge Ozy's actions.
 
SpeedingUptoStop said:
well, he certainly fucked up if Rorshach managed to beat him in the end, from beyond the grave.:D

Under estimating Rorschach was obvious a weakness, but did Manhattan not do the exact same thing? Their immaculate is only contended by this, it's a plot hole for dramas sake... or they know/see that the allegedly diary published by a fanatic right-winged news paper will come to nothing.

Snidely Whiplash said:
So Veidt's decision stopped war forever and everyone lived happily ever after? Or did he delay this particular war for who knows how long? No matter what Veidt is still a mass murderer who deserves to die for his actions, which I'm pretty sure I've been saying all along. Veidt=Evil

You have been saying that all along, it's just as silly now. "If he didn't do what he did the world would of ended but we'd rather all be dead, get him!!"
 
Spirit of Jazz said:
Under estimating Rorschach was obvious a weakness, but did Manhattan not do the exact same thing? Their immaculate is only contended by this, it's a plot hole for dramas sake... or they know/see that the allegedly diary published by a fanatic right-winged news paper will come to nothing.



You have been saying that all along, it's just as silly now. "If he didn't do what he did the world might have ended but we'd rather all possibly die than be murdered, get him!!"
There you go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom