The difference is that Vita is an improvement.Frillen said:Just like the DS was fucked? Are we back in 2004?!
lol, the hyperbole.tribal24 said:/e3 thats a wrap
Ushojax said:It's like going back in time 7 years. As long as the Vita has the exact same games as the PS3 it won't be fucking anything.
Ninja_Hawk said:Sooo...where all those that said anyone who thought it would be $250 was delusional![]()
You me and Pachter. I can't believe it.TheExodu5 said:Wow, I got owned. I really thought it was going to be $400.
3DS is going to get rocked.
PSP looked a lot better than the DS if I recallReBurn said:The difference is that Vita is an improvement.
I really think $250 is a megaton.spons said:No megaton? No way.
MechaX said:Hm... Combined with the $249 price and Nintendo essentially fumbling the 3DS launch, Sony might be in a pretty damn good position in the handheld market this time around.
No way they were ever gonna be lower than Nintendo, but matching them exactly? That's amazing.Zen said:199 would have been flat out amazing, but 249.99 is still one hell of a deal. Sony has learned (we should have guessed that with their reasonable TV/Bundle pricing earlier).