Early 'The Mummy' reviews, "Dark Universe is dead on arrival"

ComicsBeat review.

I had some awfully low expectations going into this, but holy cow did they blow right past them and into the gutter with this production. This coming weekend, if you get the urge to go see this, do yourself a favor and purchase someone in your life a ticket for Wonder Woman instead. That will be a far more enriching experience.

It's 9 am, on Wednesday June 7th, and I'm calling it on the Dark Universe, dear readers.

Full review at the link. Embargo stops on the day of release...

Post more early ones if you find them. Full review thread will go up by someone else when the embargo drops.

Edit:

Matt Goldberg from Collider (though, for some reason, they didn't want to publish it)

http://goldbergblog.com/2017/06/07/the-mummy-review-a-wretched-abomination/

Polygon.


qcBBtg8.png


http://www.indiewire.com/2017/06/th...tella-russell-crowe-dark-universe-1201838756/



http://www.empireonline.com/movies/mummy-3/review/

Weird URL considering there was a third Mummy movie already. (I know, maybe they mean the third franchise or something?)

 
Ugh, sort of expected but God dammit.

Luckily I watched edge of tomorrow again a week ago do hopefully my cruise middle quota is good for a while.
 
But without a series of nine unrelated movies however will we get invested enough in Dr Jekyll to feel the full weight of his betrayal? :(
 
One review from a spurious fan website I've never heard of.

I'll wait for multiple reviews from much more respected sources before declaring this "dead on arrival!"
 
People gotta stop announcing their series/cinematic universe plans before the first one even comes out.
 
So are they gonna take a second mulligan on this one and delay the "official" start of this Universal Universe to a third film?
 
One review from a spurious fan website I've never heard of.

I'll wait for multiple reviews from much more respected sources before declaring this "dead on arrival!"
Screening impressions seem pretty divisive. Some GAF impressions, and other thoughts, said the movie was pretty decent and enjoyable, while the people that disliked it really disliked it
 
Oof.

Maybe this will convince them that action movies aren't the way to go with the classic Monsters.
 
Given that Cruise's character sounds like he's supposed to have some loose morals, I thought it could have been interesting if the movie had gone for a bit of a dark twist and had him accept the Mummy's advances. Basically 'Beautiful immortal goddess has the hots for me? Sounds good!'. Going to guess that's not where this movie goes.
 
Fuck, I needed this to be good. I want a good Cruise action film again and this seems like it could be an awesome new blockbuster series when done right. I did already fear for the worst though. Same goes for pirates, which I hoped would be better as well.

Thankfully, Wonderman delivered, which I did not expect either.
 
Dayum. Tom Cruise output is normally so solid too.

Jack Reacher films are bad. Mission Impossible films are alright, decent Sci Fi, Oblivion a bit basic though. Knight and Day was bad. I thought he made more films but actually not that many.

Did anyone watch Lion for Lambs?
 
Brought to you by one-half of the duo that spearheaded such cinematic classics as Star Trek: Into Darkness and Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
This is actually how I described Kurtzman to someone a few hours ago
 
Top Bottom