that still helps my case lol, the "best games" in average dont have good frame rate, doesnt make a whole lot of sense
its all about the contextOcarina of Time at 20fps is still a better video game than a lot of those that run at 60. Framerate != game quality.
But OOT would be inarguably better at 60fpsOcarina of Time at 20fps is still a better video game than a lot of those that run at 60. Framerate != game quality.
its all about the context
But OOT would be inarguably better at 60fps
Games are a mixture of artistic and technical factors. Both factor into how good or bad it is.Sure, and even better at 120, right? That doesn't mean we mark games up for being able to hit higher frame rates. As long as it's perfectly playable it simply doesn't matter no matter how much we prefer it.
Agreed but this isn't necessarily true of other Franchises like Persona. Giving the review to the publication resident fan will likely result in a narrow focus of the review. This is fine on an individual level but when you have a 100 similar reviews on metacritic with very little variation it can be an issueConsidering Souls games have been going for 13 years, it's probably quite hard to find members of staff who don't have experience with Souls games, whether they loved or hated them. Unless you're just starting out, frankly it would be pretty embarrassing to be someone paid to play video games and to have NOT experienced one or more by now considering the industry impact they've had.
Doesn't this suggest that you want some variation in experience or options with individual reviewers? Okay your not interested in beginner reviews but you require a minimum level of knowledge/ competency but just having the super harcore fans do reviews may not be applicable to you?Frankly I don't want someone that's inexperienced with a genre/subgenre telling me about a game, I want an """expert""" opinion, the word being used very loosely.
Really? Surely it's likely that you have completely different tastes and preferences to hardcore JRPG players. Obviously they will have greater knowledge than a casual player and are definitely valuable to the consumer. It doesn't necessarily mean they will be good at recommending games you enjoy. I'am like you a very casual JRPG player I loved dragon quest 11 but bounced off Persona 5 hard. Yet if I am to believe metacritic Persona 5 is the better game.I don't play JRPGs much but I want the big JRPG fans to recommend to me what they consider the best JRPGs, not someone who played literally one and thought it was great. I can do that myself.
Agreed that is definitely valuable but why can't we have it all?If longtime Souls players band together and say "this is the best one yet" then that information is absolutely valuable to someone who's not played any.
I see you aren't very bright, so let me explain it to you in simple language.Don’t know, why did you thought it was important to go on a thread to celebrate a game to make everyone know you don’t care about it? Did you want to feel special or something?
Doesn't this suggest that you want some variation in experience or options with individual reviewers? Okay your not interested in beginner reviews but you require a minimum level of knowledge/ competency but just having the super harcore fans do reviews may not be applicable to you?
Really? Surely it's likely that you have completely different tastes and preferences to hardcore JRPG players. Obviously they will have greater knowledge than a casual player and are definitely valuable to the consumer. It doesn't necessarily mean they will be good at recommending games you enjoy. I'am like you a very casual JRPG player I loved dragon quest 11 but bounced off Persona 5 hard. Yet if I am to believe metacritic Persona 5 is the better game.
Miyazaki-sama* fixed
I'm sorry to doubt you even a little, Miyazaki-san.
Quote those reviews that mention Xbox, most publications only have PC keys.
Right but there’s plenty other threads going on in the forum why would you go to one that you’re not interested in and announce that? Do you wanna feel special or something? Do you think we care?I apologise, I mistakenly thought I was in a forum where discussion was a positive.
Or, do you want an echo chamber where everyone agrees?
You can say whatever you want and we can challenge you. Deal with it and stop crying because you got called out.I see you aren't very bright, so let me explain it to you in simple language.
This is a forum, and this means people will offer their opinions, and you won't always agree.
Do you understand?
What you are looking for is an echo chamber, a safe space, where everyone agrees - so perhaps try Reset-Eran as it's full of imbeciles who all think the same, so you'll fit right in.
Poor choice of words on my part for me hardcore would be someone who has beaten every souls game. I would be perfectly happy to read reviews from 1st timers ( even if they are rare at this point) or people that didn't fit this criteria.Here's the thing - how do you know it's only super hardcore fans reviewing Elden Ring..? Having played the previous games doesn't make you a super hardcore fan. I wouldn't even call myself one and I've beaten everything so far. All I'm looking for are people that are at least a little clued into what From have been doing for the last decade or so, I don't think I've seen any review so far claiming to be written by a superfan who's beaten every game a dozen times over. If they can properly describe how the game has evolved from its predecessors then generally I trust that they know what they're talking about. Alanah Pierce saying that the game "isn't accessible just because you can teleport away from bosses" was a totally bullshit statement and she swiftly deleted the Tweet once she realised because it looked like she had no idea what she's talking about.
Sure but it doesn't have to be one or the other. Instead you could listen to someone who's taste align with yours than an expert on a genre.Not really, if people deep in FPS games tell me Titanfall 2 has an amazing campaign, I'm definitely more like to trust them than some guy who played the latest COD campaign and said it was rad.
Fair enough.Have you never disagreed with a 90 + on metacritic? Its fine if you haven't but I would find that surprising.No real surprise that the highest rating driving games on MC are Gran Turismo, Burnout, Wipeout, Forza. Works across the board for me and games.
Not really. I don't have to call a game "overrated" because this notion simply doesn't exist.Fair enough.Have you never disagreed with a 90 + on metacritic? Its fine if you haven't but I would find that surprising.
Does he not realize the same applies to his comments. Don't get pissy when other users call you out for your "look at me im different" takes. I swear, every new high profile release brings out the attention hoes.You can say whatever you want and we can challenge you. Deal with it and stop crying because you got called out.
That said: nobody cares this game doesn't interest you.
Completely disagree all review scores are subjective. You can only ever speak for yourself and should be able to give whatever score you want.Not really. I don't have to call a game "overrated" because this notion simply doesn't exist.
What actually exists is the fact that people's taste doesn't necessarily align with mine so stuff can be excellent, I may not like it and that in no way means said stuff is bad and should be graded lower.
I don't like racing games but I don't think Forza is overrated.
Not liking=/=bad.
Completely disagree all review scores are subjective. You can only ever speak for yourself and should be able to give whatever score you want.
Yeah that's the point? Game reviews are opinions? Or do you think there something else
Fair enough.Have you never disagreed with a 90 + on metacritic? Its fine if you haven't but I would find that surprising.
You can listen to somebody sing on American Idol for 10 seconds and pretty quickly tell if somebody has legit talent or not. If you really think you need 80+ hours on a completed game to have an opinion you're fucking nutsWow, it's embarrassing just reading that. I swear the entire journalistic row of gaming is just people who were dragged in from the trash from the nearest container.
Deep my toes lol I am gonna jump in head first and swim around in it till I drown if I could get a ps5 that is...Absolutely, but here's where my problem comes in regarding the language people are using around this conversation - I don't think games "shouldn't" have scored X just because I wasn't one of the vast majority of people who thought so. The Last of Us 1/2 are the best examples, I think they're vastly overrated games, but if 100 critics think they're 8+ games, I have to accept that I'm just in the tiny minority there. People in another thread claiming that Mario Odyssey "shouldn't be" a 97 on Opencritic are crazy, they're simply in a minority and should learn to deal with that.
Not that this really applies to what you and I were talking about, but yeah. Hope you do dip your toes into Elden Ring and have a blast.
Because, I'll comment where I want.Right but there’s plenty other threads going on in the forum why would you go to one that you’re not interested in and announce that? Do you wanna feel special or something? Do you think we care?
You are the one who got so monumentally butthurt because I voiced my opinion in an open forum that you've been repeatedly crying over it.You can say whatever you want and we can challenge you. Deal with it and stop crying because you got called out.
That said: nobody cares this game doesn't interest you.
You can tell from 10 seconds if they got promise, not if they can sing well technically, or how well their voice can handle more than pre-chosen songs.You can listen to somebody sing on American Idol for 10 seconds and pretty quickly tell if somebody has legit talent or not. If you really think you need 80+ hours on a completed game to have an opinion you're fucking nuts
The lack of self-awareness if really fun, you know?Does he not realize the same applies to his comments. Don't get pissy when other users call you out for your "look at me im different" takes. I swear, every new high profile release brings out the attention hoes.
Not gonna read that, sorry.You are the one who got so monumentally butthurt because I voiced my opinion in an open forum that you've been repeatedly crying over it.
All I said was I must be one of the few people who isn't particularly interested in this game...that's all.
I didn't attack the game, or anyone in here.
For some reason, this upset you so much you had to tell me about it..multiple times.
So, for the third time, and please pay attention this time...this...is...an...open...forum...about...games.
Everyone can, and does, voice their opinion.
If you find this unsettling and need to retreat to a safe space where everyone reinforces your worldview and never questions anything, then you should avoid an open forum.
Is that making any sense to you?
Wishful thinking or opinion?I won’t assume anything at all I’m just pointing out your wishful thinking is sad. That is all. I honestly don’t know why that is so important to you. Sony will make vasts amount of money from both Elden Ring and HFW either way and I’ll gladly play both. The joke is on you, buddy.
But you can't climb everything, anything really. Fake news.
Wishful thinking. You're the one that started the derail lol.Wishful thinking or opinion?
I bought both titles as well and?
Going to continue to derail?
But at same time that review useless to people enjoy JRPGs and as huge fan of Xenoblade, I wouldn't exactly recommend that game as your FIRST JRPG.They might see value from a review from someone in the same boat as them.
Bruh you just joined this thread to be antisocial just fuck off.Because, I'll comment where I want.
Does that register?
Get it through your thick skull, you don't decide what is said and by whom.
Now, run along.
Absolutely but that's my broader point no singular review will work for everyone so its good to have as much variety as possibleBut at same time that review useless to people enjoy JRPGs and as huge fan of Xenoblade, I wouldn't exactly recommend that game as your FIRST JRPG.
Sure but the way I see it if someone who zero experience with JRPG reviewing them can fresh perspective but at the same time they cant be informative about the game because the reviewer himself/herself are inexperienced.Absolutely but that's my broader point no singular review will work for everyone so its good to have as much variety as possible
Yeah agreed as long as the reviewers is transparent about this and articulates there points well I don't see the issue.Sure but the way I see it if someone who zero experience with JRPG reviewing them can fresh perspective but at the same time they cant be informative about the game because the reviewer himself/herself are inexperienced.
Nope.Wishful thinking. You're the one that started the derail lol.
Elden Ring performance: what to expect on PS5, Series X/S and PC
Elden Ring's launch has been marked by strong reviews praising its gameplay and art direction, but also questions over …www.eurogamer.net
- Nothing was changed from Beta
- Performance mode: 45-60fps
- Quality Mode: 30-60fps
- Unlocked framerate for both machines
- 60fps in Quality Mode is rarely hit
- PS5 is typically operating at a higher frame-rate than Series X
- Even with the trade-offs PS4 app on PS5 is the best way to play the game on consoles right now
Agreed.Sure but the way I see it if someone who zero experience with JRPG reviewing them can fresh perspective but at the same time they cant be informative about the game because the reviewer himself/herself are inexperienced.
Exactly! For example lets say I want get in to MMOs, I would want to go to reviewer who has experienced with those type of games and tell me what so special about them and how inexperienced player can get in to it, but if you got to reviewer who has also zero experienced then it wouldn't be informative review, it would be just waste of my time.Agreed.
People with no understanding or appreciation of the style/genre shouldn't be reviewing those games (IGN's Ryan McCaffrey giving legit survival horror GOLD like Alien Isolation a 5.9 for example, just because he couldn't figure out game mechanics) It's fine if a game isn't for a certain player, but someone hating a legit well made game because it's strengths went over their head shouldn't tank review scores or sales. Silent Hill 2 was sh*t on by many at launch despite it having arguably the best story and horror set pieces in video gaming. Souls games were trashed by many despite them having some of the best pure gameplay experiences and exploration of the gen (and Dark Souls 1 is now one of the most influential games of all time). Certain games and genres have strengths that should be reviewed by people understand those strengths on at least some level. Reviewers should have range. They don't even have to be fans, but they should have an understanding of what they're reviewing. I'm a survival horror fan/junkie to the core, but Persona 5 was my first game the series and it's now one of my games of the gen because I can appreciate JRPGs and good combat systems due to at lease some history with games like Final Fantasy and Chrono Trigger.
Ever notice people that are not Souls fans, or have even played these types of games, are very vocal about it being overated/overhyped from just videos.Exactly! For example lets say I want get in to MMOs, I would want to go to reviewer who has experienced with those type of games and tell me what so special about them and how inexperienced player can get in to it, but if you got to reviewer who has also zero experienced then it wouldn't be informative review, it would be just waste of my time.
It was not. I covered AI and its lack of reactions and why that might be and how it worked in mineFunny how his valid points about AI was seemingly ignored in all reviews.