Kid one: "My AI can beat your AI!"I'm all for having proper and unbiased information but stuff like this makes me wonder what it will be like in 50 years when everyone has their own personalized ai. We think we live in bubbles now…
I think this is the thing about Elon. I imagine it's hard to be remotely normal when you have that much money. So a lot of people in his situation are probably weird in similar ways. But Elon desperately wants people to like him, think he's funny and that he's a good poster in a way that the others don't seem to give a shit about.We all have stupid thoughts and stuff we keep to ourselves. Musk post everything that pops into his head.
The Ai equivalent ofKid one: "My AI can beat your AI!"
Kid two: "Well, my AI works for Nintendo!"
To be fair, for Elon it has nothing to do with his money. It's just his personality.I think this is the thing about Elon. I imagine it's hard to be remotely normal when you have that much money. So a lot of people in his situation are probably weird in similar ways. But Elon desperately wants people to like him, think he's funny and that he's a good poster in a way that the others don't seem to give a shit about.
Musk has always been and always will be a charlatan.
It's because AI like Grok were the final dam wall against the constant flood of BS that people would randomly post online.This has been going on since Grok confirmed that xAI was trying to make it more right wing, but I think it was this post that was the nail in the coffin. It's a shame because Elon bought twitter to get rid of how political twitter had become and now it feels like twitter is more political than ever with the owner literally manipulating AI.
I say fuck AI. I hate how every tweet has the very first post asking Grok if this is real. It's retarded to have AI fact check every post. Thats what community posts are for. Just remove Grok from twitter and let fucking human beings interact with each other instead of constantly turning to Grok to affirm your right or left wing political views. twitter used to be fun. Politics are never fun.
This comes just days after Elon Musk was seen posting replies to Grok over information he disagreed with, going as far to call Grok a "Dumb AI" for citing sources he dislikes.
...so a source he dislikes."Sources he disliked", he lambasted Grok for using Rolling Stone of all websites as a neutral unbiased source and he was absolutely right.
Then the smart thing to do would be to ask the AI to sample more sources, not change it completely so that his opinion is the right opinion."Sources he disliked", he lambasted Grok for using Rolling Stone of all websites as a neutral unbiased source and he was absolutely right.
...so a source he dislikes.
Same for all the other times he's publicly criticised Grok it's always been when Grok has gone against his views.
You seem to be glossing over all the other times he's done, but to answer your question, I can't say, I've never read it, but I'll ask you, who gets to decide what sources are "unbiased and neutral" and why is Grok always berated by Elon Musk when it doesn't agree with him.Is he wrong? Would you consider Rolling Stone a neutral unbiased outlet?