"The alt-right is here, the alt-right is not going anywhere, the alt-right is going to change the world."
You guys should also have a look at what a white nationalist thinks of the election.
Loyalists of the self-described white nationalist, alt-right movement from around the country gathered in D.C. Saturday afternoon, enthused by the election of Donald Trump and optimistic that their controversial, offensive views such as calling for a white, ethnocentric state were on the rise throughout the country.
"The alt-right is here, the alt-right is not going anywhere, the alt-right is going to change the world," Richard Spencer, head of the white nationalist think tank the National Policy Institute (NPI) promised at a press conference.
About 300 people split nearly evenly between conference attendees and protesters of the conference outside were on hand at the downtown D.C. event.
Spencer told journalists that he doesn't believe Trump himself is alt-right, the term he coined that's come to embody white supremacist, anti-Semitic and sexist ideas. But it was clear that his surprise election has given the once fringe movement a jolt, and on Saturday they were eager to take a victory lap. Spencer called Trump's campaign "the first step towards identity politics in the United States."
One of their chief policy proposals they hope to push through is a 50-year immigration freeze, with a preference given to European immigrants coming into the U.S. Spencer told NPR's Kelly McEvers in an interview Thursday that their ultimate goal was "a safe space effectively for Europeans," arguing for a return to the white origins of the country and protecting the white race.
Bannon told the Hollywood Reporter on Friday, "I'm not a white nationalist, I'm a nationalist. I'm an economic nationalist."
Spencer was highly complimentary of Trump's first cabinet picks, particularly choosing Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions to be attorney general. Sessions is well-known for his hard-line immigration stances, and has had his own past controversy over race when he was voted down to be a federal judge in 1986 over remarks he'd made about the NAACP and allegedly called a white civil rights lawyer "a disgrace to his race."
He said that while Sessions was not alt-right necessarily, his views on immigration and a belief that he may not fully enforce some civil rights protections were encouraging to Spencer.
"The fact that he is going to be at such a high level is a wonderful thing. What Jeff Sessions is not going to do, in terms of not prosecuting federal diversity and fair housing, I think is just as powerful as what he might do," he said.
You guys should also have a look at what a white nationalist thinks of the election.
Most of the media sees racism as a character defect; white liberal pundits see racism as bad and thus see it as offensive to call people racist. Thus, they think it's insulting, rather than analytically true or false, to say large swaths of Trump voters were motivated by racism. This results in a weird kind of reverse political correctness, where some white pundits dismiss any explanation of the election centering on racism as condescending and insulting. (Writers of color generally arent afflicted by these blinders.)
Taylor, by contrast, sees racism as a positive good. So hes willing to say what a lot of white political analysts wont: that in this election, white voters were actively attracted to Trump as a result of his racism.
Zack Beauchamp
So if this is the first moderately sympathetic administration youve had, how do you approach that? What is your strategy for the age of Trump?
Jared Taylor
To me, the form of activism that Trump has made more likely, even inevitable, is candidacies by people who are very much sympathizers with the racial realists the dissident movement of which I am part but who are not, necessarily, publicly part of it, who will profit from this new spirit of white people waking up to the fact that they, too, have collective interests.
I think this election is significant because whites, for the first time, have behaved like everybody else. They have voted for a man in whom they see a reflection of their interests as a group. Now, blacks have been doing this ever since they could vote. Hispanics, Asians everybody does this. Only whites are not allowed to have collective interests.
And given that, I see a kind of awakening I think we will see this in local elections. School boards, city councils, mayor, maybe Congress in certain districts. Thats what I expect to happen first.
Zack Beauchamp
So you think this election really does show an emerging white consciousness in America.
Jared Taylor
Yes, its inevitable. Trump simply came at the right time to benefit from this, which came to the fore for reasons that have nothing to do with him.
Black Lives Matter is an excellent reason. The continuing influx of nonwhites. The displacement of whites, in one state after another. Every time a nonwhite group demands their share of the Oscar nominations, for example, or their share of Harvard, or racial preferences of some kind all of those little things send a few more white people our way.
Trayvon Martin. Michael Brown. Those people sent thousands of white people our way. And, of course, the way the media covered all of those phenomena.