• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

EU & Canada to sign free-trade agreement (CETA) on Sunday

Status
Not open for further replies.

darkace

Banned
this !

i went to Portugal with an unlocked phone, got 100 minutes, 100 text msg, 10GB data prepaid SIM card for 10 euros (MEO)

our Canadian telecoms need to be shaken up

Canada is way too big to get that sort of pricing. Infrastructure will never be cheap in Canada.
 
Canada is way too big to get that sort of pricing. Infrastructure will never be cheap in Canada.
Canada's geographical size has nothing to do with telecom prices.

Canada isn't big, it's actually small. Really small in terms of population for its geographical size

You have 3 Big companies Bell, Rogers and Telus who collude and engage in price fixing
 

SRG01

Member
Canada is way too big to get that sort of pricing. Infrastructure will never be cheap in Canada.

Absolutely false. Infrastructure is relatively inexpensive at this point.

The problem with Wind when it rolled out was that the other Telcos deliberately filled their towers or left crappy spots when Wind wanted to share towers.

The back haul is also simplified because everything is on internet-based protocols anyway.
 

darkace

Banned
Canada's geographical size has nothing to do with telecom prices.

I'm sorry this can't be a serious post. Canada's pricing problems have enormous amount to do with its geographic size and the difficulties of maintaining infrastructure in the conditions it sees. Even though a majority of the Canadian populace is within 200 kilometres of the border, that's still a larger amount of territory than any country in Europe, with a comparatively small population.
 
I'm sorry this can't be a serious post. Canada's pricing problems are almost entirely to do with its geographic size and the difficulties of maintaining infrastructure in the conditions it sees. Even though a majority of the Canadian populace is within 200 kilometres of the border, that's still a larger amount of territory than any country in Europe, with a comparatively small population.
that is not the reason for the price gauging

the price gauging is due to quasi-monopolistic tactics and price fixing among the Big 3
 

darkace

Banned
that is not the reason for the price gauging

the price gauging is due to quasi-monopolistic tactics and price fixing among the Big 3

All countries see monopolistic tactics in telecoms to some extent. This isn't unique to Canada. What is unique is the size and conditions they operate in.
 
Good to see this trade deal go through. Interested to see how both of our economies will grow because of it

Canada is way too big to get that sort of pricing. Infrastructure will never be cheap in Canada.

It almost certainly is possible to get those prices. We don't need towers in the middle of nowhere, nor do we need them on random chunks of ice in the north. You just need to cover population centers and the roads
 

Koodo

Banned
I'm sorry this can't be a serious post. Canada's pricing problems have enormous amount to do with its geographic size and the difficulties of maintaining infrastructure in the conditions it sees. Even though a majority of the Canadian populace is within 200 kilometres of the border, that's still a larger amount of territory than any country in Europe, with a comparatively small population.
It's not just a simple majority – over 90% of the population lives that close to the border. That's a significantly smaller footprint than the USA, yet Canada is significantly more expensive in pricing.

The collusion between the three main telecoms is most certainly the driving factor behind the grotesque prices.
 

KDR_11k

Member
so is there any information out there about whether wallonia actually managed to get any changes to the agreement

I heard something vague about weakening ISDS but there's also the general nerfing CETA got due to the massive public protests against it.

UK stays winning against neoliberal trade agreements written by corporations.

The UK asked for a special treatment that would let them keep CETA independent of EU membership... Generally the UK is the country that pushes the EU towards neoliberalism, the rest of the union is more left leaning.
 
All countries see monopolistic tactics in telecoms to some extent. This isn't unique to Canada. What is unique is the size and conditions they operate in.
Countries like Norway, Sweden and Finland would have the same conditions. Relatively large for their population with only a few major cities where the people are concentrated.

You don't need full coverage or the fastest speeds in the middle of nowhere.
 
EU: Good Canada, now finish him.
*UK looks at the EU, EU looks away*
Canada: I must not...
EU: DEW IT!
*Canada execute UK by beheading*

So the story of Canada Skywalker has closed and the story of Darth Maple Syrup has begun.
This story gest even better when you realize that "Darth Maple Syrup" is a name Lucas could have come up with.
 

Jebusman

Banned
that is not the reason for the price gauging

the price gauging is due to quasi-monopolistic tactics and price fixing among the Big 3

As someone who works at a telco, who has to deal with Rogers/Telus/Bell on a regular basis (along with the transit providers like Allstream/Zayo/Hibernia), there is a "little" bit more to it than that.

I'm not saying it's not at least partially their practices that caused this, but there is a little bit more nuance to it.

Also environmental condtions are like the least of our worries. Aside from your routine train derailment/ship anchor/guy shooting at fibers, most equipment is build/designed/deployed with the canadian weather in mind.

You don't need full coverage or the fastest speeds in the middle of nowhere.

Honestly you'd be shocked how badly PR gets for a company if they don't make an honest effort to supply equal service to outlying areas. And it's usually a losing proposition, since the cost of deploying/maintaining those "middle of nowhere areas" definitely outweights the income we'd get from the few customers that'll be out there.

But especially now, in a world where people expect to be able to take their cell phones just about anywhere and always have it working, they get mad when they can't get service out in the middle of fucking nowhere.
 

kami_sama

Member
Do we know what was changed for Wallonia to accept the deal?

In the end, it might be a net positive, but I still have some doubts about it.
 

pswii60

Member
So the UK is gonna have free trade with Canada for the next two years and then spend another 5-10 years negotiating for a new trade deal?

Sounds like a well thought out strategy.
It wouldn't be the first time, I mean... there was the commonwealth before the EU..
 
now EU can enjoy our bagged milk

Now Canada can enjoy our canned burgers.

lg15Svw.jpg
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
I'm sorry this can't be a serious post. Canada's pricing problems have enormous amount to do with its geographic size and the difficulties of maintaining infrastructure in the conditions it sees. Even though a majority of the Canadian populace is within 200 kilometres of the border, that's still a larger amount of territory than any country in Europe, with a comparatively small population.

Canada's population isn't equally distributed, though. 83% of the population live in continuous urban areas, and then I'd assume a reasonable proportion beyond that are satellites of said urban areas. The actual amount of area you have to cover is not especially large compared to any other country of comparable population.

There will always be a 5% of whatever of Canadians it is disproportionately difficult to reach compared to most other countries, but it really isn't the main problem here.
 

Famassu

Member
I never understood the demonization of trade deals. They boost the economy in many ways. It will require some jobs to transition or evolve though.
Trade deals aren't inherently bad, of course, but there are enough red flags in CETA particularly to make a lot of people worry about its effects. Like stuff related to nature conservation. Sure, its defenders say that CETA has all kinds of jargon about nature's protection being important, but from what I've understood, all of it is basically just suggestions and not legally binding, whereas all the investor protection stuff is legally binding and opens up whole nations to being vulnerable to big corporations suing if they, say, try to introduce new laws to protect nature that affect those big corporations (negatively).

It just potentially makes nature conservation harder when nations have more hurdles to go through if they want to introduce new laws concerning conservation. It seems hard enough for governments to make important decisions relating to battling climate change & ruining nature. It'll become even harder if big corporations flash the possibility of some billion dollar lawsuits if "harmful" laws are introduced in some country. This is bad because we are at a point where we really need to take drastic measures to battle all kinds of environmental issues not to end up with a worldwide catastrophe and all the things CETA will possibly make possible are things that go against us taking steps in the right direction, potentially acting as breaks at a time when we need to accelerate our efforts of environmental protection.

All of this could have been pretty easily prevented with stricter language in the parts of CETA that are about these issues instead of being so soft-handed about environmental issues while protecting the big money at all costs.

And environmental protection isn't the only thing that has the potential to suffer.
 

forms

Member
Does this mean I get to import stuff from your dispensaries to Sweden?

In all seriousness, as I haven't looked into the agreement, what does it bring for the average EU citizen? I mean those of us that aren't British.
 
Wasn't really following it, despite it being in the news here in Belgium nonstop. Why were Wallonia and Magnette playing hardball in the first place?
 

Moosichu

Member
UK stays winning against neoliberal trade agreements written by corporations.

You do know which party is currently the most popular in the UK right? You do realise that in the position the country is in right now, they will probably swallow any trade deal that comes their way.
 

-Plasma Reus-

Service guarantees member status
I hope Canada gets closer and closer. Then freedom of movement between Canadians and Europeans happens.
 

Dingens

Member
[...]Overall, donno. Since the US isn't involved I'm less nervous of companies butt-fucking countries but I still don't know

If you're worried about US companies, they'd only need a subsidiary in Canada (which most of them have) to take advantage of the treaty... that's why it was referred to as TTIP through the back door.

When everybody else has free trade, you join them or become a non factor.

if you are a nation of 5 million, sure. If you are a the biggest trading block in the world with more than 500 million inhabitants? no tariff in the world would companies stop from trying to do business there

I never understood the demonization of trade deals. They boost the economy in many ways. It will require some jobs to transition or evolve though.

because usually they are trade deals in name only.

A free trade agreement with Canada should be rather safe. It's a huge mass of land but it's not very densely populated.

yeah, just ask the US how they feel about getting sued by that canadian oil company through nafta ;)

GIVE ME CHEAP MAPLE SYRUP

this deal isn't going to change that, tariffs are already miniscule
 

djkimothy

Member
Fucking finally, I hope this will help when it comes to shitty prices for dairy products that we have here.



Canadian dairy farmers are pissed off about this deal, that alone is reason to like it.

Unfortunately supply management is still in effect. We do get a boost in dairy imports but i think it'll mostly be the high end cheeses. we will still get goug d by the dairy farmers.
 

GSG Flash

Nobody ruins my family vacation but me...and maybe the boy!
It's a good thing to piss off farmers?

When they run a cartel that supply manages and price gouges Canadians to the point that we pay some of the highest prices for dairy in the western world, yes it is.

Unfortunately supply management is still in effect. We do get a boost in dairy imports but i think it'll mostly be the high end cheeses. we will still get goug d by the dairy farmers.

That's true, but they will definitely start to feel some of the squeeze from competition. The dairy farmers are already trying to negotiate with the government about compensation for lost revenue as a result of CETA, which, to me, seems extremely entitled.

I read that European cheese exporters will now be able to export 30k tonnes of cheese to Canada, up from 13k that they're allowed to export right now, so that's a nice boost.
 

oneils

Member
From memory, this deal is not going to impact the Canadian dairy market all that much. I don't expect to see a decrease in prices.
 

djkimothy

Member
When they run a cartel that supply manages and price gouges Canadians to the point that we pay some of the highest prices for dairy in the western world, yes it is.



That's true, but they will definitely start to feel some of the squeeze from competition. The dairy farmers are already trying to negotiate with the government about compensation for lost revenue as a result of CETA, which, to me, seems extremely entitled.

I read that European cheese exporters will now be able to export 30k tonnes of cheese to Canada, up from 13k that they're allowed to export right now, so that's a nice boost.

Yah, i think it's ridiculous considering the already favorable market conditions they're allowed. A coworker of mine says she has to buy milk in Ottawa because it's cheaper than in Quebec. $6 in hatineau compared to $4.27 for 4 L.

don't get me started on the cheese.

But as i said before. i hope the wine market opens up for us.
 

Razorskin

----- ------
From memory, this deal is not going to impact the Canadian dairy market all that much. I don't expect to see a decrease in prices.
Damn, the prices are high in Quebec, and the lobby must have an insane advertising budget because their ads are everywhere.
 

Tugatrix

Member
High or low?

Over here I can get 1 liter of milk for 0,42€. I almost feel dirty buying it.

You should, the producers can't get a profit from it, many survive because of the government support.

My main concerne about this deal is the rule that states can't press charges in court against corporations
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom