• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Ex-CEO sentenced to 28 years in jail for knowingly selling salmonella tainted peanuts

Status
Not open for further replies.

MJPIA

Member
Here's one CEO that did not slip free of the law for his actions.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/21/us-usa-georgia-salmonella-idUSKCN0RL24H20150921
The former owner of a peanut company in Georgia was sentenced to 28 years in prison on Monday for his role in a salmonella outbreak that killed nine people and sickened hundreds, a rare instance of jail time in a food contamination case.

Stewart Parnell, 61, who once oversaw Peanut Corporation of America, and his brother, Michael Parnell, 56, who was a food broker on behalf of the company, were convicted on federal conspiracy charges in September 2014 for knowingly shipping salmonella-tainted peanuts to customers.

Contamination at the company's plant in Blakely, Georgia, led to one of the largest food recalls in U.S. history and forced the company into liquidation.

U.S. District Judge Louis Sands gave Michael Parnell 20 years in prison. Mary Wilkerson, 41, a former quality control manager at the plant who was found guilty of obstruction, was sentenced to five years in prison.
The Justice Department described Stewart Parnell's sentence as the largest in a food safety case.
During the seven-week trial last year, prosecutors said the Parnell brothers covered up the presence of salmonella in the company's peanut products for years, even creating fake certificates showing the products were uncontaminated despite laboratory results showing otherwise.

The Parnells have said they never knowingly endangered customers, and their supporters asked a judge on Monday to show mercy.
An official with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention testified at the trial that the company's peanut products sickened 714 people in 46 states, including 166 of whom were hospitalized.

Did a search and saw nothing.
Lock if old.
 

smurfx

get some go again
good hope he rots in jail. if only other ceo's were held just as accountable for the terrible shit they do.
 

MJPIA

Member
So they spent years faking it instead of fixing it??

Looks like it.

Prosecutors were asking for life in prison.
Judge estimated 803 years in prison for his actions but decided that would be inappropriate.

I just discovered the abc article about the case is a lot more in-depth.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/boy-testifies-sentencing-salmonella-peanut-butter-case-33926267
Haven't made many threads so I'm unsure about thread posting ediquette, should I replace the story in the OP with this one or is that frowned upon?
 

Bodacious

Banned
Should have contributed to the DNC!

dead2.gif
 

SURGEdude

Member
What an unmitigated cunt. Should get treated like a serial killer since that's what it is. I'm OK with quite a bit of leniency and forgiveness for negligence and disregard of duty. But willful? Fuck this asshole.

Some companies find it cheaper to deal with the cover up/consequences, rather than fix or recall the issue.

Stuff like jail time will go a long ways towards fixing this problem. Even this sociopathic asswipe would have walked the straight and narrow if he'd known his ass was on the line.
 

Kill3r7

Member
Some companies find it cheaper to deal with the cover up/consequences, rather than fix or recall the issue.

I will never understand this mindset. Do these folks really think the truth won't come out? I'm surprised the QA director did not receive a longer sentence.
 

SURGEdude

Member
I will never understand this mindset. Do these folks really think the truth won't come out? I'm surprised the QA director did not receive a longer sentence.

It's like that scene it Fight Club about the car accidents. Companies routinely decide that the hit to their name or cost of lawsuits is less than the cost of recall which will also result in a hit to their name. Then you figure the small chance they get away with it, and it's not a big surprise they do this stuff. Gotta be a really sick person to be OK with that though, even for a CEO/CFO type.
 
I will never understand this mindset. Do these folks really think the truth won't come out? I'm surprised the QA director did not receive a longer sentence.
No, they expect to make big bucks and then to have quit by the time it comes to light. And for the corporation they left behind to be penalized fiscally, but the humans inside it to not be held accountable by the law.

See the Exxon story that broke over the weekend. The plan usually works.
 

SURGEdude

Member
No, they expect to have quit and made big bucks by the time it comes to light, and not be held accountable by the law.

See the Exxon story that broke over the weekend. The plan usually works.

A lot of them settle because they intimidate the person with endless litigation and then tie the payment to a confidentiality clause so that the person they screwed can never talk about it.
 

Futurematic

Member
I will never understand this mindset. Do these folks really think the truth won't come out? I'm surprised the QA director did not receive a longer sentence.
Because they have decades of concrete evidence proving that rich people usually don't pay for their crimes.

Heck if I had been worried about the cover-up the last decade of letting torturers and cheating financial engineers go free would be strong evidence that spending a few million in lobbying is a better return on investment then fixing the problem.

Obviously they forgot to buy enough people, but I'm sure they were busy forging ways to kill more people.
 
A lot of them settle because they intimidate the person with endless litigation and then tie the payment to a confidentiality clause so that the person they screwed can never talk about it.
Also a good point. A big corporation has a lot of resources (read: $$$) to bully lawsuits down to a more manageable size... and they know it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom