• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

FAA Study: Many commercial pilots have difficulty flying planes manually

Status
Not open for further replies.
Full article at Wall Street Journal.

Commercial airline pilots have become so dependent on automation that poor manual flying skills and failure to master the latest changes in cockpit technology pose the greatest hazards to passengers, an international panel of air-safety experts warns.

A soon-to-be-released study commissioned by the Federal Aviation Administration determined, among other things, that "pilots sometimes rely too much on automated systems and may be reluctant to intervene" or switch them off in unusual or risky circumstances, according to a draft reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

While over the decades automation played a big part in making flying today safer than ever in the U.S. and globally, the draft highlights some downsides. The study found that some pilots "lack sufficient or in-depth knowledge and skills" to properly control their plane's trajectory, partly because "current training methods, training devices and the time allotted for training" may be inadequate to fully master advanced automated systems.

Among the accidents and certain categories of incidents that were examined, roughly two-thirds of the pilots either had difficulty manually flying planes or made mistakes using flight computers.

Relying too heavily on computer-driven flight decks—and problems that result when crews fail to properly keep up with changes in levels of automation—now pose the biggest threats to airliner safety world-wide, the study concluded. The results can range from degraded manual-flying skills to poor decision-making to possible erosion of confidence among some aviators when automation abruptly malfunctions or disconnects during an emergency.

The report is the first of its kind to meld historic data from accidents and incidents with real-time observations of working pilots, according to people familiar with the details. Instead of just focusing on training and cockpit design, the study takes a broader approach to consider pilot interactions with air-traffic controllers and other operational issues.

The observers found that in most instances, pilots were able to detect and correct automation slip-ups before they could cascade into more serious errors. But when pilots "have to actually hand fly" aircraft, according to one section of the narrative describing interviews with trainers, "they are accustomed to watching things happen…instead of being proactive."

Enjoy flying home for the holidays, GAF!
 

Branduil

Member
See: that incompetent co-pilot on Air France 447 who didn't know how to get out of a stall or hear the stall warning.
 

lexi

Banned
See: that incompetent co-pilot on Air France 447 who didn't know how to get out of a stall or hear the stall warning.

It's easy to criticize sitting in front of a computer but GODDAMN that particular case was dumbfounding. So many lives lost due to a stupid human error.
 
This is nightmare fuel.

As a teenager, I became inexplicably terrified of flying. Sweaty hands, shaking, having to control my breathing, the full enchilada. I've been a frequent flyer since I was six, since my parents work took me on tons of international flights. Out of nowhere, BAM...became afraid to fly.

My current line of work involves me flying fairly regularly, so it's something I've had to deal with. For the most part, I've overcome it. Every once in a while I have an absolutely terrible flight (flying in a hurricane sucked) that puts me back in that teenage mindset.

To make a long story short, the main way I deal with this fear is I remind myself over and over again that the pilots are trained professionals and they know exactly what they are doing at all times. Even when something happens that makes my heart jump, I tell myself that the pros are up in the cockpit.

What if they aren't so good after all?
 

Pimpwerx

Member
Modern craft are inherently less stable and more reliant on computer assist than past aircraft. There's also a lot more of them in the air. Perhaps that has something to do with it than just lack of training.

Then again, a pilot not knowing how to recover from a tip stall is pretty troubling. I thought that was one of the mandatory elements of pilot training. PEACE.
 
D

Deleted member 80556

Unconfirmed Member
I think I'm going to avoid flying for a few days, maybe months.

I think it's more likely years.
 

Yaboosh

Super Sleuth
Hasn't pay for pilots "nose-dived" as well in recent years? That can't be a good thing for safety either.
 

iamblades

Member

Old school military pilots are the best. They were paid to train full time, and they trained for the worst case scenarios. It is just not economically feasible for a civilian trained pilot to have anywhere near as much experience as a military trained pilot.

The problem is that militaries(even the US military) don't train pilots in the numbers they used to, because with the more high tech planes, drones, cruise missiles, etc., fewer pilots are needed in modern wars. You don't have to blanket the sky with planes to maintain air superiority these days.

The pilots the military does train tend to be career military these days, it pays better.

Training to be an airline pilot as a civilian requires so much education and training time that you really have to love the job to become a pilot these days, because the hours are shit and the pay isn't really that great when you consider the time investment in training relative to other high skilled jobs.
 

demon

I don't mean to alarm you but you have dogs on your face
My friend is/was a flight attendant for a regional airline and good god the things she tells me about some pilots. Young, inexperienced, worked to death and tired as shit.....makes me never want to fly for some shitty regional. When I get on a plane I damn well better see some grizzled old dude with a mustache and a tattoo on his arm from "the war" greeting me from the cockpit.
 
According to the draft, "the definition of 'normal' pilot skills has changed over time" and "has actually increased to being a manager of systems."

See, some peckerwood's gotta get the thing up. And some peckerwood's gotta land the son of a bitch. And that "peckerwood" is called a "pilot".

-- Pancho Barnes, "The Right Stuff"
 

Wanace

Member
This is nightmare fuel.

As a teenager, I became inexplicably terrified of flying. Sweaty hands, shaking, having to control my breathing, the full enchilada. I've been a frequent flyer since I was six, since my parents work took me on tons of international flights. Out of nowhere, BAM...became afraid to fly.

My current line of work involves me flying fairly regularly, so it's something I've had to deal with. For the most part, I've overcome it. Every once in a while I have an absolutely terrible flight (flying in a hurricane sucked) that puts me back in that teenage mindset.

To make a long story short, the main way I deal with this fear is I remind myself over and over again that the pilots are trained professionals and they know exactly what they are doing at all times. Even when something happens that makes my heart jump, I tell myself that the pros are up in the cockpit.

What if they aren't so good after all?

I'm the same as you.

I take .5 mg of Xanax and down it with a few beers.

Bizarrely enough the best flight I ever had was in a DeHavilland Beaver sitting in the copilots seat...probably because I could see everything that was happening.
 
Most people have a difficult time operating a car safely, and we let anyone drive those. I'd still rather be on a flight than on the road, anytime.
 

zma1013

Member
If we let airline pilots get drunk and snort cocaine, they'd be able to invert the plane and crash land in fields saving 90% of the people.
 

Mesousa

Banned
Not really shocking.

The plane does most of the work by itself once you get it in the air. Only part you really have to do is land, and that is like 9/10ths of pilot school. Shit even in Pilot Wings landing was the battle. That is real life simulation coming at you from your Super Nintendo in 1991.
 

Aylinato

Member
Surely if they make the auto-pilots good enough you wont really need a pilot?


I prefer humans being competent enough to handle that 5-10% failure rate for computers(especially with corporations which don't care about safety first, but with money and are less willing to upgrade/repair unless they literally have to)
 

Cryolemon

Member
I prefer humans being competent enough to handle that 5-10% failure rate for computers(especially with corporations which don't care about safety first, but with money and are less willing to upgrade/repair unless they literally have to)

True. With good enough redundancy though you could probably get to a point where you need one guy who knows how to land and not much else.
 

caramac

Member
Surely if they make the auto-pilots good enough you wont really need a pilot?

iMmPp9ZVVWjOb.gif
 
I'm the same as you.

I take .5 mg of Xanax and down it with a few beers.

Bizarrely enough the best flight I ever had was in a DeHavilland Beaver sitting in the copilots seat...probably because I could see everything that was happening.

Being able to see where I'm headed would make a significant difference, no doubt.

Being on solid ground is even more ideal. :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom