Dennis is it just me or you're having a good time in these F4 threads?
Being skeptical of Bethesda isn't some wacky irrational thing. The last 2 Fallout games and Skyrim had massive technical problems. Looking through the media for Fallout 4, it's pretty obvious that it still looks bad in a lot of the same ways the other Fallout games looked bad, and I don't see how bolting new things onto their Frankenengine inspires any confidence that this one won't be totally buggy, too.
Tronlight said:Dennis is it just me or you're having a good time in these F4 threads?
PC brethren are you playing this comfy couch mode with a controller or kb/m?
Yea But it's still a major improvement compared the skyrim,You forgot dog on fire. I kid, I kidTo be fair, the animation is still pretty bad per the videos.
When did I say skepticism was bad. I acknowledged that criticism can be made and rightly so, but what alot of what is happening in here is simply ridiculousness. I see you have conceded the graphical argument, so lets go to the moving goalposts one.
I never talked about their technical problems, but yup they sure have them. From their scripting engine that barely holds together, to their animation which only marginally improves on game iteration. I accept that though as nobody makes the kind of game for the PC like Bethesda does. When someone does, I will be highly interested. I'm not excusing that behavior/viewpoint, and not criticizing anyone for speaking up about it. Or the graphics. My issue is with the runaway hyperbole, which I've made abundantly clear.
I imagine Dennis as the guy, and the truck and car posters in the thread.
This thread is so bonkers I actually can't tell if this is a joke.
Ya, I've heard that before.
For real ahah.I imagine Dennis as the guy, and the truck and car posters in the thread.
Just to be clear I'm joking.
I mean, Fallout 4 looks really bad, but I played Fallout 3 on PS3 for 140 hours and New Vegas on PC for the same amount of time with no graphical mods and I had no problem with them. I actually found their looks to be... charming. If that makes any sense.
The thing I really don't like is the change in art-style, it looks too colorful, IMHO. And the hud is horrible.
I haven't. The game looks like dogmeat shit.
Just to be clear I'm joking.
I mean, Fallout 4 looks really bad, but I played Fallout 3 on PS3 for 140 hours and New Vegas on PC for the same amount of time with no graphical mods and I had no problem with them. I actually found their looks to be... charming. If that makes any sense.
The thing I really don't like is the change in art-style, it looks too colorful, IMHO. And the hud is horrible.
I haven't. The game looks like dogmeat shit.
Do people just ignore the whole massive weapon modding, settlement creation, and "biggest game we've ever made" when talking about this game? It's going to be the biggest and best Fallout game yet.
Sorry for the off topic question but how did fallout perform on the console? Stability and frames.
Why do I have to suffer because of other people's terrible taste?Yeah, but given one of the biggest mods for Fallout 3 is Fellout with over 2M downloads and 25K endorsements, I can see why they made that move. Besides, Fury Road has taught me that the apocalypse can be festive and colorful. And shiny.
I imagine Dennis as the Watchdogs guy, and the truck and car posters in the thread.
Why do I have to suffer because of other people's terrible taste?![]()
Easton Dark said:Those system requirements for a maxed Fallout 4 AND a feature-heavy ENB would be insane.
Maybe someone will mod Fell-In and add the green-yellow back. Besides, with all of the MASSIVE ENB work people have done on Skyrim, I'm optimistic of some really sexy wrappers for it. Assuming Boris can make it work, of course.
I'm still amazed those system requirements are that high. I have a 980ti so I'm not too worried, but those are either recommended specs for 60 fps locked at 1080p at max, or the game is horribly optimized. I'm hoping for the former.Those system requirements for a maxed Fallout 4 AND a feature-heavy ENB would be insane.
I'm still amazed those system requirements are that high. I have a 980ti so I'm not too worried, but those are either recommended specs for 60 fps locked at 1080p at max, or the game is horribly optimized. I'm hoping for the former.
Those system requirements for a maxed Fallout 4 AND a feature-heavy ENB would be insane.
I'm still amazed those system requirements are that high. I have a 980ti so I'm not too worried, but those are either recommended specs for 60 fps locked at 1080p at max, or the game is horribly optimized. I'm hoping for the former.
IIRC Boris made an ENB for GTA5 which is DX11 I think? Boris seems to just make ENB for games he enjoys, so if he likes FO4 at all he will probably make it work.I don't think ENB even works on non-DX9 games.
Okay... don't be offended... but I wonder when we're finally going to have threads without somebody posting screenshots from The Witcher 3.
I mean, it's starting to get comical. It seems like every second thread you read somebody finds a wayto toss in a few screenshots of Geralt.
We've got an Elite Xbox One Controller thread going - I swear, if Geralt shows up in it I think I'll have to hang myself.
PC brethren are you playing this comfy couch mode with a controller or kb/m?
PC brethren are you playing this comfy couch mode with a controller or kb/m?
PC brethren are you playing this comfy couch mode with a controller or kb/m?
I wish more people were like you in their assessmentsWould severely cut down the amount of "I played this for 30 mins and it is the worst game of all realms and eons" posts that plague every OT.
PC brethren are you playing this comfy couch mode with a controller or kb/m?
Graphics look fine to me, better than vanilla FO3 and NV, but worse than modded with Vurt's/NMC/OJO Bueno texture packs.
I'm sorry but this game really looks like ass.
That's not fair, man. They added depth of field.
The first setting I turn off in games.
They also added a ton of other things but ok.That's not fair, man. They added depth of field.
That's not fair, man. They added depth of field.
And it's not motion blur?
Slap some ReShade on there and we've got a stew going.
Man, houses in the future are made of card-board with stone wall wallpaper pattern. I knew it!
both at the same time. Anything with blur is gone.
These are good. PC version of FO4 looks good.
There's hyperbole, and then there's saying these two games look the same and that one is a budget title where the developers didn't invest in any new tech whatsoever.
![]()
Here are several more direct comparisons.
![]()
The first setting I turn off in games.
If you can't see a substantial improvement from Fallout 3 here, I don't know what else to say.
A toast to blur haters.