Honestly, at this point I feel pretty confused and I would bet that I'm not the only one.
The past couple pages have been dominated by Blargonaut's many cryptic remarks and the almost equally cryptic responses to them. Is it a code? Is it a joke? Is it just people saying stuff? I can't tell, but I don't want to discount it either.
The argument between Daryl and Sorian earlier also seems weird to me, mostly because it seemed like they were arguing very vehemently about very basic and subjective differences in play preference. But since it sounds like they've played together before, why did these differences only come up now?
Finally, I see I've appeared on several "has said nothing" lists and have a vote against me from popomatic for that reason. I did post earlier with some basic thoughts and explained that I was on a plane all day today (now arrived!) I don't want to get off on the wrong foot with this game-- please let me know if there's anything specific I can do to help discussion. I may not always respond ASAP, but I will respond.
No hard feelings there, i missed that you were on a plane. Blame my list for that, but dont be afraid to step on others foots, this is a mid season game, it will get heated very soon, be prepared.
I have a disturbing lack of reads from what I've read so far. It could be that I'm rusty, or maybe it's because the mafia are hiding on the margins on this one. I have a sort of busy day; I will check back periodically.
I wouldn't make anything of Sorian v Darryl. Could be a little song and dance, but Darryl has a way of pissing people off.
I have a disturbing lack of reads from what I've read so far. It could be that I'm rusty, or maybe it's because the mafia are hiding on the margins on this one. I have a sort of busy day; I will check back periodically.
I wouldn't make anything of Sorian v Darryl. Could be a little song and dance, but Darryl has a way of pissing people off.
However, I have a theory about Blargonaut. Some of us have pointed out he keeps saying phoenix down. I'm sure this has occurred to someone else, but maybe he has a role that makes him post that every page.
Is there an FF boss/enemy that keeps reviving himself throughout the fight?
You know, blarg, it has usually no effect. Looking at your items and the fact that you can only carry 9 of them is worrying me a bit. You are wasting items that could be important later on, are you doing that on purpose ?
However, I have a theory about Blargonaut. Some of us have pointed out he keeps saying phoenix down. I'm sure this has occurred to someone else, but maybe he has a role that makes him post that every page.
Is there an FF boss/enemy that keeps reviving himself throughout the fight?
You know, blarg, it has usually no effect. Looking at your items and the fact that you can only carry 9 of them is worrying me a bit. You are wasting items that could be important later on, are you doing that on purpose ?
thinking about it again, you will have to die in order to use that item, otherwise it wont have any effect and since blarg is alive i doubt it will have any effect atm.
thinking about it again, you will have to die in order to use that item, otherwise it wont have any effect and since blarg is alive i doubt it will have any effect atm.
Could be just some usual Blarg BS, but I think it's something to think about. I'm not saying that it has an effect on the game; it could just be a posting requirement role. There may be more to it.
Tbh, I'm ok with figuring this out by lynching him.
Could be just some usual Blarg BS, but I think it's something to think about. I'm not saying that it has an effect on the game; it could just be a posting requirement role. There may be more to it.
Tbh, I'm ok with figuring this out by lynching him.
Sorry, i did not read through NX, but i played in GOP and the only role that was talking strangely was myself, i was quoting Obama speeches. But i was vanilla Town
If Blarg is posting that as a requirement and not a breadcrumb then it is incredibly convenient that it landed on Blarg plus it paints a huge target on him saying "I'm a power role!" I don't think this is the case.
If Blarg is posting that as a requirement and not a breadcrumb then it is incredibly convenient that it landed on Blarg plus it paints a huge target on him saying "I'm a power role!" I don't think this is the case.
As in, to have you guys maybe think along the same lines as me, do you think he's trying to attract the action of another role? Perhaps a role that could flip him to mafia?
Cute, that won't be happening this time though, I'm confused if you are talking about something that you noticed that might have been against the rules or if you are just keeping some read close to your chest.
I have a disturbing lack of reads from what I've read so far. It could be that I'm rusty, or maybe it's because the mafia are hiding on the margins on this one. I have a sort of busy day; I will check back periodically.
I wouldn't make anything of Sorian v Darryl. Could be a little song and dance, but Darryl has a way of pissing people off.
However, I have a theory about Blargonaut. Some of us have pointed out he keeps saying phoenix down. I'm sure this has occurred to someone else, but maybe he has a role that makes him post that every page.
Is there an FF boss/enemy that keeps reviving himself throughout the fight?
He obviously doesn't need to post it on every page, he didn't even join us until 24 hours into the day phase. This is either a breadcrumb/puzzle or just a waste of our time, up to you which one you expect it to be.
As in, to have you guys maybe think along the same lines as me, do you think he's trying to attract the action of another role? Perhaps a role that could flip him to mafia?
Hmm, he could be signaling? This is too obvious though, if we flip anyone and we see that scum have a lost partner and it is revival or phoenix down related thats a strong give away.
As in, to have you guys maybe think along the same lines as me, do you think he's trying to attract the action of another role? Perhaps a role that could flip him to mafia?
How high is the scale of this game in regards of bastardized games ? My initial thoughts were" no fucking way this could be possible, but hell, you are making me doubt that
Cute, that won't be happening this time though, I'm confused if you are talking about something that you noticed that might have been against the rules or if you are just keeping some read close to your chest.
He obviously doesn't need to post it on every page, he didn't even join us until 24 hours into the day phase. This is either a breadcrumb/puzzle or just a waste of our time, up to you which one you expect it to be.
Hmm, he could be signaling? This is too obvious though, if we flip anyone and we see that scum have a lost partner and it is revival or phoenix down related thats a strong give away.
Honestly, at this point I feel pretty confused and I would bet that I'm not the only one.
The past couple pages have been dominated by Blargonaut's many cryptic remarks and the almost equally cryptic responses to them. Is it a code? Is it a joke? Is it just people saying stuff? I can't tell, but I don't want to discount it either.
The argument between Daryl and Sorian earlier also seems weird to me, mostly because it seemed like they were arguing very vehemently about very basic and subjective differences in play preference. But since it sounds like they've played together before, why did these differences only come up now?
Finally, I see I've appeared on several "has said nothing" lists and have a vote against me from popomatic for that reason. I did post earlier with some basic thoughts and explained that I was on a plane all day today (now arrived!) I don't want to get off on the wrong foot with this game-- please let me know if there's anything specific I can do to help discussion. I may not always respond ASAP, but I will respond.
No worries, thanks! I remembered that you were travelling. We do have at least another day, so thanks for your thoughts so far. You haven't voted yet, who is most suspicious to you right now? Remember, you don't have to be miserly with your votes, they are free to use.
Also, this applies to everyone, there is absolutely no problem with being a low post count player! Just make sure your few posts are delicious.
Hahaha, sounds like they had a jolly reunion. Welcome back, Launchie!
Looks like Launch is keeping his vote on Blarg for now, although it seems like it could change. Just keeping an eye on those who vote for him, since Blarg is such an easy 'anti-town playstyle' target for mafia votes in the early phases of the game. Then again, I may be dismissing Blarg too early as a Warrior of Chaos candidate. The way I see it:
1. Blarg is Cosmos, and is playing his usual way (which btw I laughed aloud several times while catching up with the thread so thanks!). One of the advantages of his playstyle is that we can see who is lazy enough to vote for him. So far TAP and Launch are the only votes on him.
2. Blarg is Chaos, in which case heaven help us all. It will be impossible to figure this out in the early stages of the game because he is playing in his usual style. He has since toned down on the joke posts and has started pursuing low activity players, which is great.
Huh. At this point in the game Blarg was also being distracting, so why choose to vote for Seath instead? In fact Nin has been playing the same game as well.
Hmm, he could be signaling? This is too obvious though, if we flip anyone and we see that scum have a lost partner and it is revival or phoenix down related thats a strong give away.
I don't really know for certain what would be Blarg's approach in this. To my knowledge, we haven't really seen him behave when he has a role of this nature, so it's hard to say how he would act in that situation. I think that a person's approach could range from obvious to subtle, and really anywhere in between, because there's always going to be doubts that surface from any approach. I mean, if he's too obvious, then we think it's too obvious to be anything; if it's too subtle, we may not see it at all.
However, he just needs to signal enough so that the parties he's interested in signaling realize he's up to something.
For the record, I don't really know if it's just usual Blarg BS or not, but I'm keeping my eye on it.
1. Blarg is Cosmos, and is playing his usual way (which btw I laughed aloud several times while catching up with the thread so thanks!). One of the advantages of his playstyle is that we can see who is lazy enough to vote for him. So far TAP and Launch are the only votes on him.
2. Blarg is Chaos, in which case heaven help us all. It will be impossible to figure this out in the early stages of the game because he is playing in his usual style. He has since toned down on the joke posts and has started pursuing low activity players, which is great.
I dont know , its still day 1 so everything i say will probably be thrown out the window but i amunsure about him. Not in a negative way, since i pretty much love him but i will hold back until we have less than 16 hours left. The fun will begin then.
TL is also pursuing the quiet ones, I'll make a note of it. Think I may do something similar now, but the deadline is approaching and I need to start thinking seriously about who I want to eliminate.
So I will be waiting until the next day phase to put out a read list. There's a lot of chaos and I want to make sure that I have some time to really access the situation. My gut is that I trust Sorian and think that Blarg is indeed brradcrumbing something for later. Blarg gonna blarg, go figure.
I've been thinking about the list, who generated, and the two people who were talking that got it going, but I'm going to table that line of thought until tomorrow (because I really don't want us to eliminate an active poster)
vote: Xamtheking
Where are the antics Xam? I figured a game with you, blarg, and all the high posters would make this game crazy!
So Launch has posted some real reasons for why he's susp of Blarg, thinking that he could be signalling. Guess there's some weight behind his vote in that case, I take back what I previously said about it being a 'lazy' vote.
So Launch has posted some real reasons for why he's susp of Blarg, thinking that he could be signalling. Guess there's some weight behind his vote in that case, I take back what I previously said about it being a 'lazy' vote.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not entirely sure about my reasoning, I'm just throwing some thoughts out there. But really, however fun it may be, keeping Blarg around is going to cause more pain in the end.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not entirely sure about my reasoning, I'm just throwing some thoughts out there. But really, however fun it may be, keeping Blarg around is going to cause more pain in the end.
I dont want to be the party pooper , but lets see how he is going to play the next couple of hours he has shown that he can be a good player.
I for one will wait and see what he is going to do.
Huh. At this point in the game Blarg was also being distracting, so why choose to vote for Seath instead? In fact Nin has been playing the same game as well.
Nin has just been about as worthless so far and he held my vote for an amount of time as well. I give Blarg the benefit of the doubt because I know how strong of a player he is.
I don't really know for certain what would be Blarg's approach in this. To my knowledge, we haven't really seen him behave when he has a role of this nature, so it's hard to say how he would act in that situation. I think that a person's approach could range from obvious to subtle, and really anywhere in between, because there's always going to be doubts that surface from any approach. I mean, if he's too obvious, then we think it's too obvious to be anything; if it's too subtle, we may not see it at all.
However, he just needs to signal enough so that the parties he's interested in signaling realize he's up to something.
For the record, I don't really know if it's just usual Blarg BS or not, but I'm keeping my eye on it.
Nin has just been about as worthless so far and he held my vote for an amount of time as well. I give Blarg the benefit of the doubt because I know how strong of a player he is.
So Launch has posted some real reasons for why he's susp of Blarg, thinking that he could be signalling. Guess there's some weight behind his vote in that case, I take back what I previously said about it being a 'lazy' vote.
I'm sorry, but the pain in the ass he can be is much more important to me than him being a good player in one specific case (which, by the way, I have no idea when that was).
Nin has just been about as worthless so far and he held my vote for an amount of time as well. I give Blarg the benefit of the doubt because I know how strong of a player he is.
Yeah, I said that wouldn't be happening this time, that would mean I'm not a gossip.
If it's too obvious then let him join the scum team, we figure it out easily later anyway.
Without a total government rehaul, I highly doubt money will ever be removed from american politics. Wolf-pac is coming from a good place but the actual backlash from basically anyone with a say makes it impractical.
Cher is a scrub.
It is 100% a cost saving measure. They have their hands in so many different jars that sometimes it's easier to just "outsource" if you will, technilogy that can be easily created by others.
Yes, Obama has always been one to try and connect with the people and be as hip as possible. It's not a bad thing, such a an easy thing to do that boosts his popularity with people that are already partial towards him.
A relic of the past that is convenient to sweep under the rug.
Rolling stones are pretty good, there are better bands out there like the beatles and led zepplin off the top of my head though.
I'm pretty useless with computer manufacturers so I'm skipping these two.
Yes, self driving car makers should be liable for anything that happens as if they were the driver in an accident where the self driving car was at fault, as long as it can be proven that there was no tampering from the passenger within the case.
Not really my expertise either, sorry
The meaning of life in most species is to continue the progeny. Humans are a tad different because we are already a diverse and far reaching species but for the more humble creatures in the world, that's about it.
Nah, humans will get a huge boost to survival rates once they figure out cancer. Cancer can do amazing things to DNA breakdown if it were actually controllable in any way.
Didn't know this guy's name, I know of him, guy is a douche. I hope the legal system is allowed to run its course and he is charged with anything that he should be charged for.
Bllodborne is a fantastic game, Witcher 3 is my game of the year so they weren't wrong their but bloodborne deserves high praise.
Good for the environment? No, humans are a strain on the world at large and the longer we live and the larger the population gets, the more strain that the environment takes on.
Their pretty fun, I didn't think I'd enjoy them as much as I would. I get some weird excitement from figuring out these puzzles.
I'm amazed you even got this far.
This sobered me up more than it should have.
Super humble.
This was all nice and distracting from the actual game we were doing.
he has shown that he can be a good player.