fuckkkkkk, is sleep the only way to get gains? Even if your resting and just laying there. No gains?
Is it still possible to get gains if I sleep well tonight? Or has that chance been lost?
I can't tell if you're being a parody. You need sleep, for a variety reasons which I don't feel like posting here ( hint: it involves hormones in your body when you sleep), but one bad night of no sleep will not negate your workout, or your "gains" if you prefer.
Look at the big picture.
Are 5 reps really the optimal range of reps? Everyone that I talk to says that its bullshit and that you can never gain the optimal amount of strength or size doing 5 reps of squats or bench press. It's honestly getting to the point of me straight up not wanting to do it anymore because they all think I'm following some looney workout.
Optimal for what? And who are these people you are talking to? What have they accomplished? What is their reasoning? Lots of people like to shoot their mouths off after accumulating 3 years of "listening to their body" with a 225 bench.
To further answer your question, it depends. If you want to gain strength, then training heavy singles, doubles, triples, and 5s is a good way to do it, however you can't always go heavy every single session after a while. Many routines have you doing sub-maximal volume, like 5/3/1 or the Texas Method.
If you want to quit doing 5's because your friends don't like it, then it's good to know that you will always be a slave to the opinion of others.
So I'm looking for some tips/advice on cutting weight. I can diet pretty easily and I know what to eat, but what's the best way to do it with minimal muscle loss? I just finished my first attempt at bulking up. I was eating 3,500+ calories a day.
I'm 22, 6'2, 185 and I just want to lose 5-10 pounds for the summer. My maintenance level is about 3,000 calories, I seem to stay at the same weight when I eat that much. As long as I'm getting enough protein can I eat 2,000 calories a day or is it better to go slower than that?
And yesterday I ran 5 or 6 miles on top of my lifting routine, but I wasn't sure if I should compensate and eat more or just stick with my normal diet.
If you're maintenance is 3000, then 2000 will mean a daily deficit of 1000. Over a week, that's 7000 cals, or roughly 2 lbs. That's a pretty aggressive diet, and I wouldn't try to pile on cardio on top of it. In addition, you may notice a drop in gym performance, which may require a reduction in overall volume.
What are some good compound exercises that don't require a barbell? I don't have room for a barbell and I'll never go to the gym, my social anxiety is way too big for that.
Being a slave to your insecurities is a good way to make you live a mediocre and wasted life.
Side note: it's hot as balls out here in Chicago, and I am seeing so many cardio goobers on the street. All of them run like someone shot them in the ass with a tranquilizer dart and almost all 'jog' at walking speed. How unfortunate that this is considered a workout. In 3 months time, they'll be a smaller, less muscular version of themselves....well, those that don't give up during week 2.
I'm going to toot my own horn here. Yesterday I helped someone move during the hottest day of the year thus far in Chicago. I loved it. I loved carrying the stuff up 3 flights of stairs, the heat, the exertion. Everyone else was hot, sweaty, beat up, and just wanted to go home.
I'm about 6'3 and 230-ish lbs with a body fat in the mid 20s. I'm not the pinnacle of athletic endeavorism, but I try. I was in far, far better shape then these people who did yoga, jogged, did 'martial arts,' and other stuff. The reason I tell you this is not to go, "Look how awesome I am," but rather to show how 'effective' all those forms of 'exercise' are and what taking it easy gets you.