Peroroncino
Member
I could understand them being afraid of risking their lives, especially if say, they can't swim, but recording it, taunting and laughing? Nu-uh, fuck that, I hope they get some sort of comeuppance for this, fucking monsters.
I could understand them being afraid of risking their lives, especially if say, they can't swim, but recording it, taunting and laughing? Nu-uh, fuck that, I hope they get some sort of comeuppance for this, fucking monsters.
I could understand them being afraid of risking their lives, especially if say, they can't swim, but recording it, taunting and laughing? Nu-uh, fuck that, I hope they get some sort of comeuppance for this, fucking monsters.
Five teenagers who taunted a drowning man while recording his death from afar may face criminal charges, a Florida police chief said Friday.
Cocoa Police Chief Michael Cantaloupe said Friday he will recommend the state attorney prosecute the teens under a statute that requires a person with knowledge of a death to notify a medical examiner. The state attorney will decide whether to file the charges, which would be a misdemeanor under that statute.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/21/us/florida-teens-drowning-man/index.html
Not near enough but at least they could be charged with something.
Because people online aren't real?
Maybe Florida should make a law about this.
interesting. i always love empirical studies on legal institutes like this. found a pdf version too for anyone who is interested.I don't think so.
While this is reprehensible behaviour, laws mandating assistance are wholly ineffective and possibly counterproductive. Such laws exist in France, Germany and in three of the US States (the other seven US states mentioned further up the thread have much narrower versions of the law).
There's a really powerful article in the Texas Law Review of 2006 that goes into the empirical evidence for this (covering number of prosecutions, number of potential prosecutions, and actual rescues compared across states with and without these laws). Haven't been able to dig it up online, but the full citation is:
Hyman, D. A. (2006). Rescue without law: An empirical perspective on the duty to rescue. Texas Law Review, 84(3), 653-737.
Well worth a read.
I don't think so.
While this is reprehensible behaviour, laws mandating assistance are wholly ineffective and possibly counterproductive. Such laws exist in France, Germany and in three of the US States (the other seven US states mentioned further up the thread have much narrower versions of the law).
There's a really powerful article in the Texas Law Review of 2006 that goes into the empirical evidence for this (covering number of prosecutions, number of potential prosecutions, and actual rescues compared across states with and without these laws). Haven't been able to dig it up online, but the full citation is:
Hyman, D. A. (2006). Rescue without law: An empirical perspective on the duty to rescue. Texas Law Review, 84(3), 653-737.
Well worth a read.
What would have been "counterpriductive" about calling 911? That's something which usually clears you of any guilt of such laws, especially in an unsafe situation like this.
Hyman(2006) said:An unappreciated risk of encouraging voluntary rescue is
that the situation may be a trap. There are a number of cases of
criminals pretending to be in need of assistance, only to turn on the
Good Samaritans who stop to help them.31
No excuse for laughing at a man in mortal danger. Even if you can't help him, call 911.
But these laws wouldn't come into effect in that example.That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that a law mandating rescue attempts would likely be counterproductive. For example:
The state of Florida currently does not have a law where a citizen is obligated to render aid or call for help for anyone in distress.
Welcome to the millenial generation. Or whatever comes after that. These kids are soulless idiots IMO. A generalization I find to be fair so far. I might be proven wrong.
It's not about saving him. It's about their reactions. The victim does look a bit off the normal end though. Not sure what is going on in his life.
Maybe the kids were just being silly and didn't understand totally what things meant at the time.
Welcome to the millenial generation. Or whatever comes after that. These kids are soulless idiots IMO. A generalization I find to be fair so far. I might be proven wrong.
It's not about saving him. It's about their reactions. The victim does look a bit off the normal end though. Not sure what is going on in his life.
Maybe the kids were just being silly and didn't understand totally what things meant at the time.
At least one of those kids will grow up and murder someone, I guarantee it.
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that a law mandating rescue attempts would likely be counterproductive. For example:
This is complete nonsense.Welcome to the millenial generation. Or whatever comes after that. These kids are soulless idiots IMO. A generalization I find to be fair so far. I might be proven wrong.
It's not about saving him. It's about their reactions. The victim does look a bit off the normal end though. Not sure what is going on in his life.
Maybe the kids were just being silly and didn't understand totally what things meant at the time.
Imagine lecturing people as to empathy and psychopathy, and then having your lecture degrade into torturous fantasies and callous/innacurate remarks on the humanity of those kids."no remorse"?
These are a bunch of literal psychopaths. They belong in court mandated therapy and their home lives should be investigated.
Shit, these kids are not even human. They lack the empathetic nerve centers in their brain. I guarantee at least one of these kids will grow up to be a killer, without a doubt. Probably worse. None of them will be what any average person would describe as "normal".
Edit: Fuck it. Humanity was a mistake. Throw these worthless bags of human waste into shark infested waters.
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying that a law mandating rescue attempts would likely be counterproductive. For example:
Can't lawmakers come with a law and retroactively punish them?
Look at regular shrink over here"no remorse"?
These are a bunch of literal psychopaths. They belong in court mandated therapy and their home lives should be investigated.
Shit, these kids are not even human. They lack the empathetic nerve centers in their brain. I guarantee at least one of these kids will grow up to be a killer, without a doubt. Probably worse. None of them will be what any average person would describe as "normal".
Edit: Fuck it. Humanity was a mistake. Throw these worthless bags of human waste into shark infested waters.
The state of Florida currently does not have a law where a citizen is obligated to render aid or call for help for anyone in distress.