Formula 1 2017 Off-Season |OT| Presenting the Ferrari F-5H17-80X
that's a winner right there
Formula 1 2017 Off-Season |OT| Presenting the Ferrari F-5H17-80X
Formula 1 2017 Off-Season |OT| Presenting the Ferrari F-5H17-80X
Also:
I would love it if this season ends up being a close battle between Red Bull and Merc.
Zak Brown hope fans are "excited" by the look of the 2017 McLaren when it is unveiled before pre-season testing.
Although no launch date has yet been set, the team's new executive director confirmed he had signed off the car's livery with the team's workforce given the first look at the car.
"I've just signed off on the new car livery, so I think the fans are going to be excited about what the car looks like, both technically and visually," Brown said at the Autosport International Show.
"[We will launch] right before the Spain test, no specific date yet. But we've shown it to the shop floor and are very exited about our future."
http://www.skysports.com/f1/live-bl...ip-column?utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=referral
McLaren online launch on Feb 19th according to nextgen.
Brown hopefully brings back the orange 😎
That actually looks pretty cool. Reminds me of Jos Verstappens Arrow.
Yep, new livery is coming:
McLaren online launch on Feb 19th according to nextgen.
Brown hopefully brings back the orange 😎
Pretty much, yeah.Am I right in thinking that livery colours are usually based around the title sponsor's colours?
Esteban Gutierrez has announced a limited Formula E programme, but I doubt his F1 career is over if the Manor team can be saved. It would be crime if it is not, as the team is still in a very decent position if somone has some investment to put in. As I understand it, there are two nearly completed 2017 monocoques and a well-developed plan to be on the grid in Melbourne, but if that is going to happen, an investor is needed now and the investment needs to be considerable. If it does not happen, the team will have to be closed and the assets sold, which will not help anyone. One can hope that the administrator can find some sort of a deal with one of a number of group that were interested in the team, but were driven away by financial demands of the previous owners, which do not seem to have much base in reality. The word is that Ron dennis may be backing one of the bids, which would be very good for the team.
https://joesaward.wordpress.com/2017/01/12/just-keeping-up/
At this point I have to ask, why would ANYONE invest in lower tier Formula 1 teams? It keeps happening despite how much of a bad idea it is.
Because the team can potentially become profitable and earn money to investors.
Because the team can potentially become profitable and earn money to investors.
Because the team can potentially become profitable and earn money to investors.
Because the team can potentially become profitable and earn money to investors.
What happened to the rumors of an Asian consortium buying manor?
Martin Brundle has revealed he suffered a minor heart attack while covering the Monaco Grand Prix last year.
The former Formula One driver, who is now a television commentator, was taken ill on his way to the podium ceremony at Monte-Carlo.
I had a small heart attack running to do the podium in Monaco, Brundle revealed during an interview at the Autosport International show.
Brundle continued to interview race winner Lewis Hamilton and the other podium finishers Daniel Ricciardo and Sergio Perez.
To quote Jackie Stewart...You might as well invest in lotto tickets.
The best way to make a small fortune in motor racing is to start with a large one.
Don't risk your health, Martin! We always have a backupcumberbatch
To quote Jackie Stewart...
Wasn't Bieber present during last year's Monaco podium celebrations?
Got to taste the Chandon before anyone else, too.
At that moment, millions of F1 fans were simultaneously praying to their respective gods that Bieber wasn't going to do the podium interview.
Although, I would have liked to see that just once.
I think I'd prefer Bieber over most presenters on the podium. Like you said, at least once.
Formula 1 racer turned TV commentator Martin Brundle predicts that this year's new breed of car will be ”a monster" to drive – and warned that they could be detrimental to the racing.
Speaking at Autosport International's Racing Car Show, Brundle believes that the extra downforce and grip levels from the new rules set will complement the huge torque and power from the hybrid-turbo power units.
But he warned that going back to a level of high tyre grip and less degradation – combined with huge power – could potentially have a negative effect on overtaking.
”It's certainly going to be different, the cars are going to be brutal," said Brundle. ”In theory, I think we've gone the wrong way in terms of making the racing better. You hear some stories that some corners will be reclassified as straights.
”I remember driving the Red Bull when it had the blown diffuser. That thing didn't move in a lot of corners either; easy full throttle.
”With the amount of power and torque the [current] cars have got – although they don't sound very good – I've driven the Mercedes, Force India and Ferrari now. They are amazing engines to drive; endless amounts of power – even though they sound rubbish.
”Put that into a car with a lot more downforce and 25 percent bigger tyres – the whole thing is 11 percent wider – it is going to be a monster to drive. Whether it makes better racing or not, we'll find out.
”The braking distances will be shorter too. More grip means they might be braking four or five metres later. That means you have less opportunity to overtake.
”The key this is: Can they follow each other? That will be the absolute litmus test of how it works this year."
Pirelli motorsport director Paul Hembery says the changes to F1 cars and tyres in 2017 shouldn't make overtaking much more difficult.
This year's cars will have wider wings and more powerful aerodynamics, prompting fears drivers will be unable to race each other closely due to the increased turbulence.
However Hembery says the combination of more durable tyres and the aerodynamic changes should mitigate that problem.
”The package of aero that's coming for this season is intended to reduce, if you like, that impact," said Hembery at the Autosport International show.
”The tyres themselves, we've made them so there's less thermal overheating of the surface and the idea of that is you'll be able to push harder if you're trying to overtake somebody."
”So between the two the intention is that should be sufficient to give us stronger overtaking."
Mercedes aero strategy: "Who cares about turbulent air when you're in front"
I don't think anyone is surprised.
How is the 3 tyre compound thing going to work with "less degradation" though? That was one of the better additions in recent years to increase viewer enjoyment thanks to cars on different tyres fighting all the time.
Unless teams are close at the top this will be one of the more boring years in F1.
Even if there is no overtaking, if RBR/Ferrari/McLaren(lol)/Williams(lolol) is close to Mercedes then there always be uncertainty even if there aren't overtakes. To me the problem with F1 is that the end result is pretty much known before the start of the race. In the Renault/Alonso/Michelin vs Ferrari/Schumacher/Bridgestone overtaking was hard but it was exciting because nobody knew which car would be better at a given track.
Maybe I'm a optimistic but the only way for F1 to be popular is to open development during the season (and a little more testing) + more than 1 tyre supplier (which will force both to make better tyres not just safe tyres that last 500km).
sprinklers