The former, because now you have a shoot out.
Pretty fuckin much this.1. Give people a shitload of guns.
2. Tell them its their right to hold their ground.
3. Deploy armed men to raid houses without notice taking advantage of shock and awe tactics.
4. ????
5. Semper Fi!
Uh, who cares if it's not 'representative'. The fact that there's been at least 10 instances of completely wrong police assaults shows that it's a bad idea.
"Well, we've only accidentally killed 8 incorrect people, good enough for me!" does not sound like a reasonable argument to continue no-knock raids to me. They are a terrible idea and I don't get why you're trying to defend it. All they do is lead to misunderstandings, and these particular misunderstandings involve people on both sides being armed with weapons that think they're being threatened by criminals. Does that or does that not sound like a recipe for disaster to you?
Yes, people let their rhetoric get out of hand on some issues, but defending no-knock in any instance is just ridiculous. There's just way too high of a chance of something going wrong.
Your biased straw man is showing
Top rated comment on that page.
I know police can seize property but can they do that in terms of drug raids?
It's always dem librulz innit
Or
You know
It's people expressing their outage over a senseless murder during a practice which some find to be absolutely unconstitutional.
But it's easier and lazier to blame it on neo liberal bogeymen guess
I feel like I'm more likely to be killed by cops rather than helped.
I feel like I'm more likely to be killed by cops rather than helped.
That's cuz no one ever posts feel good stories about the police, cuz they completely ignore all the good they do and only focus on their fuck ups
Cuz you know, problems need to be fixed.
That's cuz no one ever posts feel good stories about the police, cuz they completely ignore all the good they do and only focus on their fuck ups
People focus on negative stories when there are issues. Good news doesn't exactly travel far anyway.This in no way addresses what he said.
Some examples of what I mentioned earlier:
From 2008 (in Virginia):
Ryan Frederick shot and killed Detective Jarrod Shivers as the latter was breaking through Frederick's front door on a no-knock raid. Police based the raid on the word of an informant who had broken into Frederick's house a few days before.
Police charged Frederick with murder. He was convicted of manslaughter and is serving 10 years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Frederick
Two more recent cases:
Marvin Louis Guy shot and killed Detective Charles Dinwiddie as the latter was breaking through Guy's window on a no-knock raid.
Guy is charged with murder in Dinwiddie's death and three counts of attempted murder for shots that hit other officers who were also forcing entry. He is currently in jail in Texas awaiting trial.
Henry Goedrich Magee shot and killed Sgt. Adam Sowders as the latter was breaking into Magee's mobile home on a no-knock raid.
Magee did not go to trial after a grand jury refused to indict him this February in central Texas.
On the flip side, when police injure or kill innocents during these no-knock raids, they are typically found to have been "following procedure" and absolved of all wrongdoing.
I've purposefully avoided links, but bolded the names so they should be easy to Google. Take your pick of news sources. And there are more like this out there.
That's cuz no one ever posts feel good stories about the police, cuz they completely ignore all the good they do and only focus on their fuck ups
That's cuz no one ever posts feel good stories about the police, cuz they completely ignore all the good they do and only focus on their fuck ups
In truth it's just a matter of percentages and money, Cops have a higher percentage of apprehending perps with minimal harm to all parties involved if the police take them by surprise. That said, tragedies do happen, but no knock raids are statistically the best way for cops to apprehend multiple potentially armed targets.So an innocent being killed is better than police *possibly* having a shootout with suspects.
How many good deeds are worth the death of one innocent?
In truth it's just a matter of percentages and money, Cops have a higher percentage of apprehending perps with minimal harm to all parties involved if the police take them by surprise. That said, tragedies do happen, but no knock raids are statistically the best way for cops to apprehend multiple potentially armed targets.
And as far as money is concerned.
1 dead guy equals = 1 settlement and some outrage
1 shoot out= Cost of ammo, Hospital Bills for perps and Cops, Possible multiple settlements from people caught in the cross fire, funeral bills, emt bills, miscellaneous property damage costs, Psychiatry bills for the cops, on site clean up costs. AND a METRIC fuck ton of outrage.
That's because their fuck ups are killing people. It's nice that a cop might occasionally help old ladies cross the street but one innocent person killed by police outweighs a million random acts of kindness. Sorry.That's cuz no one ever posts feel good stories about the police, cuz they completely ignore all the good they do and only focus on their fuck ups
"You are allowed to own guns to defend your house"
"The officer feared for his safety because he saw you armed with a gun inside your house"
What a country.
Again, like the situation with the 19-year old young boy in the other thread:
Why are the police going full-in on every random tip?
"Because someone thinks something" isn't a good reason to go in guns drawn.
Then you're an idiot if you believe a 1 in thousand chance is too small a margin of error. No job on earth has margin of error that small.This story and every other of "SWAT raid wrong home, SWAT shoots dude in wrong home etc." can represent 0.001% of all police raids this year, but that margin of error is still way too fucking high to be acceptable.
It's tragic yes, but reality check, shit happens, people fuck up. If you want perfection, that's too fuckin bad, it doesn't exist.Innocent civilians should not be harmed or fucking killed because a cop fucked up the address, or his chief felt that no-knock raids were totally okay.
This isn't remotely funny, people are dead.
It's one thing to fuck up. It's another thing not to address the fuck up and continue fucking up, one raid after another. Their methods need to be changed. The laws need to be changed. There is a resolution for this problem. It's not just a single fuck up.Then you're an idiot if you believe a 1 in thousand chance is too small a margin of error. No job on earth has margin of error that small.
It's tragic yes, but reality check, shit happens, people fuck up. If you want perfection, that's too fuckin bad, it doesn't exist.
Do you laugh at all? In the time you it took you write that response, several hundred people around the world have died.
It's one thing to fuck up. It's another thing not to address the fuck up and continue fucking up, one raid after another. Their methods need to be changed. The laws need to be changed. There is a resolution for this problem. It's not just a single fuck up.
but Shook alleges that the deputies blindly shot at Hooks through a wall without knowing who was there.
Then you're an idiot if you believe a 1 in thousand chance is too small a margin of error. No job on earth has margin of error that small.
Most jobs' errors don't involve actively killing someone with a weapon(even if some involve someone having an accident and dying).Then you're an idiot if you believe a 1 in thousand chance is too small a margin of error. No job on earth has margin of error that small.