GameLife's Andrew Rosenblum arrested

InterMoniker said:
http://img133.imageshack.us/img133/4925/melissa1lr5.jpg
Click to expand...

shocked2.gif
What the... whoever created that is demented.
 
DrEvil said:
Man, I interviewed them at E3 last year; I'll have to convert it when I get home from work - it had to have been the weirdest interview ever conducted.

who knows, maybe nancy grace will ask me to be on her show and talk about his mental health.

d
Click to expand...

he smelt your hair, didn't he?
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
I'm saying that the article is very onesided. Plus, as stated before, I won't belive it until I see the header info. Who knows, she could have typed and printed it hereself. Opps, she would never do that though because women never lie....right?
Click to expand...

Once again, dude, his DAD apparently believes he did it. Do you know Andrew better than his dad?

Do you also want to know what IP the email came from, and what DNS server doled to the computer used to send the email? This stuff doesn't end up in papers.
 
krypt0nian said:
Seek help. You um...don't own a gun do you?
Click to expand...


You can keep dropping strawmen if you want to divert the argument, but you still haven't refuted anything I've said with any type of logic at all. If it were you're butt on the line you'd want all the evidence you can get....wouldn't you?
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
You can keep dropping strawmen if you want to divert the argument, but you still haven't refuted anything I've said with any type of logic at all. If it were you're butt on the line you'd want all the evidence you can get....wouldn't you?
Click to expand...

You're personal issues with women are your own deal. I don't need to tell you that. The voices already do a great job of it I'm sure.
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
I'm saying that the article is very onesided. Plus, as stated before, I won't belive it until I see the header info. Who knows, she could have typed and printed it hereself.
Click to expand...

This is coming from the guy who says we're jumping to conclusions?


deeper_inthehole said:
Opps, she would never do that though because women never lie....right?
Click to expand...


You have issues.
 
White Man said:
Once again, dude, his DAD apparently believes he did it. Do you know Andrew better than his dad?

Do you also want to know what IP the email came from, and what DNS server doled to the computer used to send the email? This stuff doesn't end up in papers.
Click to expand...


The article could have at least said that police investigated and found that it had come from the header info. Also, his dad could be being tricked as well. He could be taking the police side and not his son's side.

Still american law is INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. It's funny how people forget that.
 
PhoenixDark said:
I'm guessing he wasn't a virgin then?
Click to expand...
:lol

I had watched gamelife once before, and it made me cringe. Made me wonder how MTV could of had anything to do with that pos. Get that kid some help though.......after the other days events how stupid could you be to come out with something like that.

He's screwed his future up for sure.

A proper weirdo and a creep. Felt I needed to add that.
 
krypt0nian said:
You're personal issues with women are your own deal. I don't need to tell you that. The voices already do a great job of it I'm sure.
Click to expand...

Keep the strawmen coming. You have yet to refute me with logic. And yes, because I single out this one case I must have issues with all women. I should pay you to be my psychiatrist.
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
Keep the strawmen coming. You have yet to refute me with logic. And yes, because I single out this one case I must have issues with all women. I should pay you to be my psychiatrist.
Click to expand...

sub_image_phil.jpg


"While I'm not a psychiatrist I can refer you to the help you require."
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
The point is, if you were charged with a crime, you wouldn't want your rep tarnished before you were PROVED guilty....would you?
Click to expand...

of course not... but that's naive of you to think it's not like that. Being accused of a crime is more than enough to tarnish your image. It's also something that many professional organizations and employers require you to disclose, regardless of you being ultimately proved innocent.
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
Still american law is INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. It's funny how people forget that.
Click to expand...

I understand what you're saying, but would they really have arrested him without any proof that the accusation was true?
 
Good.

The fact that his poorly made dumbass show got as much attention as it got (no less MTV picking it up) really annoyed me.
 
Night_Trekker said:
I understand what you're saying, but would they really have arrested him without any proof that the accusation was true?
Click to expand...


Men can and are arrested simply on a woman's word.

Duke anyone?
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
The article could have at least said that police investigated and found that it had come from the header info. Also, his dad could be being tricked as well. He could be taking the police side and not his son's side.
Click to expand...

How often do you see mentions of HEADER INFO in a LOCAL NEWS REPORT.

And his dad could be getting tricked? How do you know he didn't admit it was true to his dad? Even if he didn't, I think his dad knows him a little bit better than you, and frankly my parents (whom hated me) would never say I was guilty of something without being pretty damned sure.

Still american law is INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. It's funny how people forget that.
Click to expand...

This is a court? Wow! I DIDN'T KNOW!
 
levious said:
of course not... but that's naive of you to think it's not like that. Being accused of a crime is more than enough to tarnish your image. It's also something that many professional organizations and employers require you to disclose, regardless of you being ultimately proved innocent.
Click to expand...

To my knowledge you only have to disclose of what you're found guilty of. Otherwise, what is the point of the justice system?
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
Men can and are arrested simply on a woman's word.

Duke anyone?
Click to expand...


it does not exclusively work one way, don't be ignorant about that. I've dealt with enough domestic cases to know that that's just how it works. Same goes for restraining orders.

Deeper_Kyo said:
To my knowledge you only have to disclose of what you're found guilty of. Otherwise, what is the point of the justice system?
Click to expand...

your knowledge is false... sorry. Some might only ask about convictions, but many ask for "convicted of or accused of."
 
"Still american law is INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. It's funny how people forget that."

Always enjoyable how this gets trotted out so consistently as if it's some maxim, applicable to everyone in every situation. I'm just glad someone finally wrote an article about how wrongheaded that notion is to spare me the time.

Sherry Colb said:
Such statements, though quite common, misconstrue the role of the presumption of innocence in a criminal case and feed the mistaken belief--shared by many--that the Constitution requires everyone in the United States to presume that an accused criminal is actually innocent until a jury finds otherwise.

....

What then is the appropriate role for the presumption of innocence? In a criminal trial, the presumption of innocence is an important constitutional protection for the accused. It means that the jury may only pronounce the defendant guilty if the physical and testimonial evidence presented prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Put differently, the jury must say "not guilty" even when it believes the defendant is guilty and often, it follows, even when the defendant in fact is guilty. Until the evidentiary threshold of proof beyond a reasonable doubt is reached, the judge and the Constitution order the jury to acquit.

The reason for this rule is that a guilty verdict subjects a person to incarceration, the deprivation of freedom that we all cherish and that is guaranteed us under normal circumstances. Though the acquittal of a factually guilty man is unfortunate and costly, it is an inevitable byproduct of a system designed to reduce to close to zero the odds that a factually innocent person will be convicted of a crime.

None of this, however, has anything to do with what the rest of us--the people of the United States who are not serving on a particular criminal defendant's jury--are obligated to think or say.
Click to expand...

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/colb/20020617.html
 
ColR100 said:
:lol

I had watched gamelife once before, and it made me cringe. Made me wonder how MTV could of had anything to do with that pos. Get that kid some help though.......after the other days events how stupid could you be to come out with something like that.

He's screwed his future up for sure.

A proper weirdo and a creep. Felt I needed to add that.
Click to expand...
It was cringe television. Just as GAF got a kick out of watching the show, the MTV guys probably saw that it could get ratings as well.
 
I'm sure Astrolad and other lawyers/law students here could tell you how many school or bar applications ask a question like, "have you ever been accused and/or convicted of a felony or misdemeanor which resulted in a fine over $100."
 
White Man said:
How often do you see mentions of HEADER INFO in a LOCAL NEWS REPORT.

And his dad could be getting tricked? How do you know he didn't admit it was true to his dad? Even if he didn't, I think his dad knows him a little bit better than you, and frankly my parents (whom hated me) would never say I was guilty of something without being pretty damned sure.



This is a court? Wow! I DIDN'T KNOW!
Click to expand...


What you gives you the right to try him before the court does? It doesn't even matter if he confessed (people have confessed of crimes and been found innocent-the recent Ramsey case comes to mind). The whole point of the justice system is PRESUMMED INNOCENCE NOT PRESUMMED GUILT.

Men have a hard enough time as it is without other men presumming guilt. The women is believed most of the time. A la Duke rape case.
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
What you gives you the right to try him before the court does?
Click to expand...

Wait, I'm a court now?

It doesn't even matter if he confessed (people have confessed of crimes and been found innocent-the recent Ramsey case comes to mind). The whole point of the justice system is PRESUMMED INNOCENCE NOT PRESUMMED GUILT.
Click to expand...

Oh jesus this is so much like the Ramsey case. I'm sure whe wanted to take false credit for the notorious MURDER EMAILS!
 
AstroLad said:
"Still american law is INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. It's funny how people forget that."

Always enjoyable how this gets trotted out so consistently as if it's some maxim, applicable to everyone in every situation. I'm just glad someone finally wrote an article about how wrongheaded that notion is to spare me the time.



http://writ.news.findlaw.com/colb/20020617.html
Click to expand...


You'll keep thinking this way until it's your butt on the hotseat
 
This dude is so dumb he just better wrote a letter like this:

" dear cops come to my home when i'm slepping cause tomorrow i am gonna wake up a be more looser than today "

PD: come quick!:lol
 
AstroLad said:
"Still american law is INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. It's funny how people forget that."

Always enjoyable how this gets trotted out so consistently as if it's some maxim, applicable to everyone in every situation. I'm just glad someone finally wrote an article about how wrongheaded that notion is to spare me the time.

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/colb/20020617.html
Click to expand...

I'm not about to join Kyo in his cause here, cos I really don't care. But I don't really agree with Sherry Colb there... How can you even think someone is 'factually' guilty if you're not sitting on the jury to hear the evidence?
 
Wow... what a week......

It's like.... take the most seemingly innocent and sad minor-minor-celebrity.... and mix it with the VT massacre!

it's pretty awful.
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
Men can and are arrested simply on a woman's word.

Duke anyone?
Click to expand...
is the rabbi lying when he says that according to Rosenblum's dad that they're given Rosenblum 'the help he needs'?

is the rabbi involved in the conspiracy too?

you do know that whether or not a court of law finds someone guilty or innocent doesn't change whether or not they did it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

VGC: Disney is reportedly considering appointing Electronic Arts CEO Andrew Wilson as the successor to current boss Bob Iger
News Business  2
64
5K
Tomofdahook17 replied
EA CEO Andrew Wilson calls the next Battlefield a "tremendous live service."
2 3
110
5K
VinnyMac replied
VGC: Sega of Japan has warned players that buying in-game currency from 3rd party sellers could see them being arrested, citing a recent example
News 
10
1K
Wonko_C replied
High-ranking employees of NetEase Games, the team behind ‘Marvel Rivals’ and ‘Destiny: Rising,’ were recently arrested
News 
3
818
StereoVsn replied
Japanese Police Arrests Alleged Modder of Nintendo Switch Consoles
3
647
DeepEnigma replied
Top Bottom