GameLife's Andrew Rosenblum arrested

This sexist shit from Deeper_Kyo is great :lol

Deeper_Kyo said:
How is what I said disturbing? It's disturbing because I ask questions? Is it 1984 in here?
:lol What happened in 1984 some man was wrongly accused....
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
I'm talking about in relation to a crime.
we're making jokes on a video game message board about a strange person that may or may not have written some nasty emails. who gives a shit if he's innocent or guilty? we have no say in how his case turns out, we're just here to mock any and everything. but feel free to continue with your tirade of indignation, we'll be here chillaxin' and mocking you too.
 
levious said:
your assertion that had a women allegedly sent this threatening email that there would be no publicity or maybe even arrest is enough to show me that you're more than a bit "off." There's no point discussing it with you.

your assertion that had a women allegedly sent this threatening email

Why is that so out there. She could have.

that there would be no publicity or maybe even arrest

Quote me. I never said that. I said that there would be no thread on GAF about it.

There's no point discussing it with you.

The feeling is mutal.
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
Let me rephrase the question, would there have been jokes about the female masturbating and not having a boyfriend like in the begining of the thread, or for instance the once poster that said he would kill him if he could?

I bet there'd be jokes about how the woman was pissed because the guy didn't take her to Long John Silvers.
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
I'm talking about in relation to a crime.
well, that saw Amir0x almost arrested and slapped with something similar to a restraining order, so i'd say it's pretty similar. he was ripped apart for defending himself from a physical attack by his mother and for disrespecting the police by all and sundry.

amir0x has a lot more respect around here than i do, so yeah, based on that, if i got accused of similar i'd expect gaf to have a field day. that was all i was getting at with that little aside.
 
vitaflo said:
I bet there'd be jokes about how the woman was pissed because the guy didn't take her to Long John Silvers.
It's only $2.99!
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
your assertion that had a women allegedly sent this threatening email

Why is that so out there. She could have.

that there would be no publicity or maybe even arrest

Quote me. I never said that. I said that there would be no thread on GAF about it.

There's no point discussing it with you.

The feeling is mutal.

Someone crossreference his username with myspace and dial 911.
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
Men have a hard enough time as it is without other men presumming guilt.

See, that's why people keep referring to your "problem with women". Shit like that. What crazy bizarro world do you live in that men, particularly white men, get the short end of the legal stick? Seriously? Point me to these travesties of justice against Manhood.

Generally speaking people like that fall into two camps: deeply misogynistic nutjobs -- you know, the guys who really hate women, and guys who got badly hurt by some woman. Which camp do you fall into?

If someone wants to complain about problems with videogames and gamers, they might have a valid shot with the deep vein of misogyny that runs through the games and the gamers. It embarasses me when I see this shit.
 
I don't find anything Deeper_Kyo's saying disturbing but I'd be interested to know what colours his opinions. For all we know, he may have been a victim to the kind of woman he's talking about.. as a father, a son or a spouse. He may even be a friend of someone who was made a victim in that way. He may even just be influenced by such stories on the news. We don't know.

Kyo, from your posts in this thread alone, you've appeared misogynistic or distrustful of women. You might have reasons for feeling that way, but you can't tar an entire gender with the same brush dude. That's what people are finding amusing / insulting.
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
your assertion that had a women allegedly sent this threatening email

Why is that so out there. She could have.


of course a woman could have, you misread what I wrote.
 
"The girl could have easily framed him for some unknown reason."

"There's enough male bashing that goes on in the media."

"Who knows, she could have typed and printed it hereself. Opps, she would never do that though because women never lie....right?"

"Also, his dad could be being tricked as well."

"Men can and are arrested simply on a woman's word."

"Men have a hard enough time as it is without other men presumming guilt. The women is believed most of the time."

Where's the mysogyny in there? Maybe we are looking at the wrong place, i hope the authorities are looking everywhere and figuring out all possible pranks and jokes that could have been made. I wouldn't make the guy guilty just like that, it's important to study about about the girl's doings and behavior just as much as this guy's. (i suppose the police is doing is job properly)

Misogyny doesn't = saying something negative towards women.
 
Please realize that I'm not responding to krypt0nian because I can't find the words, he's being ignored.

Now on with the real business.

Zenith said:
"The girl could have easily framed him for some unknown reason." Possible

"There's enough male bashing that goes on in the media." True I.e. Stupid dad's in commericals and sitcoms. Duke Rape Case.

"Who knows, she could have typed and printed it hereself. Opps, she would never do that though because women never lie....right?" Duke Rape Case

"Also, his dad could be being tricked as well." Possible: He could be a hard and not want to believe his son.

"Men can and are arrested simply on a woman's word." True: Duke Rape Case

"Men have a hard enough time as it is without other men presumming guilt. The women is believed most of the time." True: Duke Rape Case

It's almost like there's some sort of hidden subtext, but I just can't put my finger on it...

Your witness.
 
True I.e. Stupid dad's in commericals and sitcoms. Duke Rape Case.

Well I'm convinced!

Like there's no stupid women in commercials or sitcoms? Jesus.
 
besada said:
See, that's why people keep referring to your "problem with women". Shit like that. What crazy bizarro world do you live in that men, particularly white men, get the short end of the legal stick? Seriously? Point me to these travesties of justice against Manhood.

Generally speaking people like that fall into two camps: deeply misogynistic nutjobs -- you know, the guys who really hate women, and guys who got badly hurt by some woman. Which camp do you fall into?

If someone wants to complain about problems with videogames and gamers, they might have a valid shot with the deep vein of misogyny that runs through the games and the gamers. It embarasses me when I see this shit.

Neither.

Duke Rape Case.
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
Thanks for the compliment.
It wasn't a compliment it was a statement.
radioheadrule83 said:
I don't find anything Deeper_Kyo's saying disturbing but I'd be interested to know what colours his opinions. For all we know, he may have been a victim to the kind of woman he's talking about.. as a father, a son or a spouse. He may even be a friend of someone who was made a victim in that way. He may even just be influenced by such stories on the news. We don't know.

Kyo, from your posts in this thread alone, you've appeared misogynistic or distrustful of women. You might have reasons for feeling that way, but you can't tar an entire gender with the same brush dude. That's what people are finding amusing / insulting.
So why all the fuss Deeper_Kyo???
 
albundy.gif


"I'm a victim of the Vast Amazon Conspiracy."
 
Ranger X said:
Where's the mysogyny in there? Maybe we are looking at the wrong place, i hope the authorities are looking everywhere and figuring out all possible pranks and jokes that could have been made. I wouldn't make the guy guilty just like that, it's important to study about about the girl's doings and behavior just as much as this guy's. (i suppose the police is doing is job properly)

Misogyny doesn't = saying something negative towards women.


Thank you.
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
I gonna ask you guys honestly. Do you really want the pages upon pages of evidence I can drop in this thread?
Is it all anecdotal? Because people love anecdotal evidence!
 
Ranger X said:
Where's the mysogyny in there?

Misogyny doesn't = saying something negative towards women.

No, misogyny is hatred or strong prejudice against women. Deeper_Kyo is spawning spurious conspiracy theories with not a shred of evidence, because he knows that women (not not some women, not a few women, but women) do that sort of thing. The implication is that women are sneaky and manipulative, which is classical misogyny. He didn't jump to a conclusion that this guy, whose own dad thinks he did something wrong, was framed by a guy, or the government, or Luke Smith -- he jumped straight to "framed by a woman" and started making ridiculous requests about seeing the mail headers.
 
besada said:
No, misogyny is hatred or strong prejudice against women. Deeper_Kyo is spawning spurious conspiracy theories with not a shred of evidence, because he knows that women (not not some women, not a few women, but women) do that sort of thing. The implication is that women are sneaky and manipulative, which is classical misogyny. He didn't jump to a conclusion that this guy, whose own dad thinks he did something wrong, was framed by a guy, or the government, or Luke Smith -- he jumped straight to "framed by a woman" and started making ridiculous requests about seeing the mail headers.

It's funny how you automatically assume he did it.

Evidence:

This site has useful statistics about how men are systematically discriminated. I notice that it are 24.

Twenty One Indicators of Systemic Discrimination Against Men

- The American woman by the 1960s lived in the nation with the world's highest standard of living and owned 65% of the wealth in that nation.
- Feminists "felt victimized", however, and convinced American women that they are "discriminated against".
- Never have they been required to nor been able to produce a shred of statistical evidence to back up that claim.
- Twenty one key statistical indicators each illustrate how men have been and are being systematically discriminated against by government fiat.

1. WEALTH: Women hold 65% of the country's wealth [Fortune Magazine]
2. CHILD CUSTODY: Women receive custody of 92% of the children of divorce and illegitimacy, and men only 4%. [Department of Health & Human Services]
3. INCOME: Men constitute 60% of workplace hours, work longer hours, work harder, and are more qualified, rarely file sexual discrimination or harassment lawsuits or take pregnancy leave, yet earn only 42% more than women [Dept. Labor]
4. SUICIDE: Men's suicide rate is 4.6 times higher than women's [Dept. Health & Human Services -- 26,710 males vs 5,700 females]
5. LIFE EXPECTANCY: Men's life expectancy is seven (7) years shorter than women's [National Center for Health Statistics -- males 72.3 yrs vs females 79 yrs] yet receive only 35% of government expenditures for health care and medical costs.
6. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: Men are discriminated against BY DESIGN through affirmative action.
7. FEDERAL TAXES: Even though men pay 115% of federal income taxes women constitute 11% more of the voters.
8. VOTE: Because there are 11% more female than male voters, males have little to no influence on how the male tax dollar is spent.
9. WAR: Men, not women, fight and die in battle [Dept. Defense -- Vietnam Casualties 47,369 men vs 74 women] while women sue the taxpayer when they have their butt pinched.
10. WORKPLACE FATALITIES: Men account for more than 95% of workplace fatalities.
11. MURDER: Men are murdered at a rate almost 5 times that of women [Dept. Health & Human Services -- 26,710 men vs 5,700 women]
12. JURY BIAS: Women are acquitted of spousal murder at a rate 9 times that of men [Bureau Justice Statistics -- 1.4% of men vs 12.9% of women]
13. COURT BIAS: Men are sentenced 2.8 times longer than women for spousal murder [Bureau Justice Statistics -- men at 17 years vs women at 6 years]
14. JUSTICE SYSTEM BIAS: Even though the amount of the average "child support payment" due from women is half the amount due from men, and even though women are twice as likely as men to default on those payments, fathers are 97% of "child support" collections prosecutions [Census Bureau]
15. WELFARE: Even though men are the recipients of less than 10% of all welfare disbursements, men are required to refund welfare payments made to women.
16. SECONDARY EDUCATION: Even though zero percent of American 12th grade girls were able to correctly answer basic math and physics questions, less than one quarter of America's secondary and elementary school teachers are men.
17. HIGHER EDUCATION: There are more than 200 all-female colleges for women and now not one single all-male college for men. 5.8% fewer men than women are enrolled in 4 year colleges, even though two thirds of those who score higher than 550 in SAT Math are males. In 1993 only 44.5% of college enrollment were men, and that figure has declined since then. Only 45.8% of of bachelor's degrees were conferred to men in 1992, even though 98.2% of the top fiftieth percentile of the GRE are men, and ZERO PERCENT of American high school girls correctly answered 28 out of 67 TIMSS advanced math questions. Only 38.4% of private 4 year college students were men as of 1990, and this figure has declined since then.
18. LEGAL SYSTEM BIAS: 96% of physical altercations resulting in injury to a spouse occurs AFTER the date of separation. [Read: spousal abuse laws that pretend that husbands are dangerous discriminate against husbands when we know that only a very small percent of domestic violence is associated with them]. [Chadwick and Heaton, "Statistical Handbook of the American Family"]
19. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: Even though study after study shows that women are the majority of the initiators of domestic violence, and 58% of the above mentioned physical altercations are initiated by the female, Congress passed the obviously anti-male VAWA and VAWA II.which are known would make the problem far worse. [Read: despite the fact we discriminate against husbands in protective orders, women still cause more than half of domestic altercations because they know they can get away with it].
20. CHILD VIOLENCE: Even though mothers commit 55% of child murders and biological fathers commit 6%, even though NIS-3 shows that Mother-only households are 3 times more fatal to children than Father-only households, children are systematically removed from the natural fathers who are their most effective protectors and men are imprisoned at rate 20 times that of women.
21. FAMILY BREAKDOWN: The US Surgeon General notes that divorce is more harmful to a man's health than smoking tobacco, yet as much as $1.3 Trillion of federal expenditures accomplish little else than undermine family stability.
22. WOMEN PILOTS: Even though women pilots have an accident rate four times that of men pilots, federal laws require that airlines risk the safety of passengers and hire women pilots anyway.
23. WOMEN DRIVERS: Even though the crash rate of women drivers is twice that of men drivers, and even though drinking alcohol increases the crash rate of men by only 5%, the majority of those imprisoned under DUI laws are men, and women are almost never imprisoned for their much higher number of non-alcohol-related crashes.
24. INCARCERATION: Even though feminists brag that 1.4 million American brides commit adultery, and even though women file more than 90,000 false allegations of rape, every year, only 99,000 of the 1.8 million Americans behind bars are women.
 
Nicktals said:
Duke Rape Case.


I heard some innocent men were falsely accused by... a woman. Is this true? We will have to rethink Andrew Rosenblum's predicament.


edit: hey, an email forward... I bet it's full of accurate and up-to-date information!

Men pay 115% of income taxes... amazing!
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
Neither.

Duke Rape Case.

So you're going to compare the relatively uncommon instance where three men get arrested, but not convicted, to the thousands of women who get raped and have their rapists walk away scot free? No one's saying the Duke case wasn't a travesty of justice, but your inability to put it into any sort of context is what makes you seem like a misogynist.
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
23. WOMEN DRIVERS: Even though the crash rate of women drivers is twice that of men drivers, and even though drinking alcohol increases the crash rate of men by only 5%, the majority of those imprisoned under DUI laws are men, and women are almost never imprisoned for their much higher number of non-alcohol-related crashes.

Not to derail further, but this one in particular has always pissed me off to no end. I was talking to my insurance agent a few days ago about this subject, and even he admitted that it's utterly ridiculous.

I can't believe how much goddamn money I spent on insurance from the age of 18-25. Sickening.

Oh, and if we want to talk about bias, how about traffic court and male judges being extra nice to pretty women? Holy Christ, what a joke.
 
besada said:
So you're going to compare the relatively uncommon instance where three men get arrested, but not convicted, to the thousands of women who get raped and have their rapists walk away scot free? No one's saying the Duke case wasn't a travesty of justice, but your inability to put it into any sort of context is what makes you seem like a misogynist.


You must be unaware of the time, money, resources, and emotional stress it takes to fight a false rape charge.
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
It's funny how you automatically assume he did it.

Evidence:

Long list of paranoid rantings about how men -- who wrote the justice system -- are plagued by it while those nasty evil women get all the good money and treasure.

Thanks. Really, thank you. It's not that often I get so quickly vindicated. Enjoy your hellish life of misogynistic paranoia. I'm going to guess you won't have to worry about it that much.
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
I gonna ask you guys honestly. Do you really want the pages upon pages of evidence I can drop in this thread?
there was a very large number of people in the duke rape case that sided with the accused right the way through. the evidence just wasn't there.

there is evidence in this case that the police will have already been mulling over. the paper is legally bound to say 'allegedly' otherwise they'll get sued, so them saying he 'allegedly' sent the e-mail doesn't mean that there isn't smoking gun evidence and that that wasn't part of the arrest.

i'm just following occams razor here. you aren't.

Cho Seung-Hui hasn't been 'proven guilty in a court of law' either. nor will he ever be. so should we presume he is innocent?
 
Deeper_Kyo said:
Let me rephrase the question, would there have been jokes about the female masturbating and not having a boyfriend like in the begining of the thread, or for instance the once poster that said he would kill him if he could?

They would have discussed how ugly she was instead. Same difference. Someone has issues with the female gender, it appears.

Anyway, I see krypt0nian and crew have this all wrapped up.
 
Men have a hard enough time as it is without other men presumming guilt.

Let's pick the above because it says all I need it to.

"other men"??? like men are supposed to automatically side with the guy in any situation, like we're part of some sort of brotherhood (bro's before ho's)? and of course, it's only other men, because women are all sluts conspiring against us. and we're supposed to believe you're not sexist.

and you keep banging on about innocent until proven guilty yet you're the one trying to convince everyone the woman was the one behind it, with no evidence to back it up, and with all current evidence stacked against Andrew. what a hypocrite.

Deeper_Kyo said:
You must be unaware of the time, money, resources, and emotional stress it takes to fight a false rape charge.

and the emotional stress of being raped...?
 
Chiggs said:
Not to derail further, but this one in particular has always pissed me off to no end. I was talking to my insurance agent a few days ago about this subject, and even he admitted that is was utterly ridiculous.

I can't believe how much goddamn money I spent on insurance from the age of 18-25. Sickening.

Oh, and if we want to talk about bias, how about traffic court and male judges being extra nice to pretty women? Holy Christ, what a joke.
Yes, but do you realize what it is saying? It's saying women crash more but more men are arrested for DUI. This really isn't a sensical comparison.
 
Top Bottom