• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Gamers’ Worst Nightmares About AI Are Coming True

IbizaPocholo

NeoGAFs Kent Brockman
While gaming experienced an unprecedented high during the pandemic, artificial intelligence crept up behind it. AI's proliferation in the gaming industry is already accelerating job loss and cheapening the work of developers at studios now scrutinized by anti-AI gamers. Data centers have siphoned RAM from the industry, resulting in a global memory shortage. This has driven up the costs of hardware required for consoles, stalling releases and rendering at-home PC building—one a rite of passage for entry-level gamers—a luxury.

In December, Valve announced it was discontinuing its Steam Deck LCD 256GB model, released in 2022, and the 2023 upgrade has all but disappeared. This is the first discontinuation of a major console before the launch of a worthy upgrade; Valve's Steam Machine, a box six times more powerful than the Steam Deck, is meant to be released this year, but its exact timing and cost remain unknown. Meanwhile, prices have gone up on Xbox and PS5. Per Bloomberg, Sony has yet to confirm or deny that the successor to the PS5, originally slated for release in late 2027, is delayed another year. And Nintendo, having narrowly avoided new tariffs to the Switch 2 launch in 2025, which they are now suing the US government over, is not considering price hikes.

Six years ago, while the world was in lockdown, the gaming industry was thriving.

Animal Crossing: New Horizons sold 13.4 million units within just six weeks of its launch date in March 2020, the most digital units of a console game ever sold in a single month. That same year, global gaming revenue increased by 23 percent, and millions who would not have previously labeled themselves gamers picked up controllers and booted up PCs.

When the Playstation 5 launched in November 2020, seven years after its predecessor, it felt like a promise that the gaming industry would be fine, even while other industries struggled to adjust to the pandemic. In July of 2021, Valve revealed the Steam Deck, a handheld console that would make it possible to play Steam games anywhere. Preorders sold out within hours.

Meanwhile, YouTubers and Twitch streamers rose in popularity with millions at home watching gamers stream in place of other on-screen entertainment. The power centers of the game industry began to bulge. Microsoft acquired Activision Blizzard and ZeniMax Media. Sony responded by acquiring Bungie in 2022 while making a $1.45 billion investment in Epic Games. Job postings in the gaming space rose by 40 percent during the pandemic.

But the rise of AI has prompted a random-access memory shortage now being referred to as RAMaggedon—and it's bringing all of this progress to a grinding halt.

The rapid rise of artificial intelligence has upended every corner of the tech industry. Nearly a third of adults and most teens in the US use AI on a daily basis, according to Pew Research. Data centers have doubled in the US since 2022, raising electricity costs up to 267 percent more than they were five years ago for households near those warehouses, according to Bloomberg. Reports show the US accounts for more than half of "hyperscale facilities," centers built specifically for AI, many of which are multibillion-dollar investments.


Those massive computing stacks require gobs of RAM, the short-term memory of any device. RAM is the green, black, and gold brain of electronics. Data centers, both AI-specific and not, are expected to consume around 70 percent of global RAM production in 2026, according to The Wall Street Journal. The shortage in available chips has caused mass delays and price hikes of electronics worldwide, rendering the gaming industry one of its biggest casualties so far.

Gaming is "the only mass media entertainment where the creative ceiling is limited by consumer hardware," Washington Post game critic Gene Park tells me. "So, if consumers can't afford or access higher grade tech like sufficient RAM, the innovation will slow down." This happens because RAM is what dictates how minute or vast world-building within a game can be.

Park argues that developers could be forced to compromise stories, art, non-player characters, battles, worlds—all of which are already at risk of being automated by new AI tools. Park says those tools still have substantial limitations. "None of it is even close to replacing handcrafted video games."

Close or not, the impact that these tools are having on games—and the push within game studios to use them to speed up development through automation—is turning up noses.

None of the developers I spoke with want to use AI, and most gamers won't have it, even in limited quantities. Alec Robbins, narrative director at Squanch Games, was told to use generative AI in a project, a decision he "fought against and lost." For gamers, it "didn't matter" that the AI became "localized to a very specific and small part of the game," though. Its mere presence diluted the entire experience and caused the company "reputational damage," Robbins says.

There was similar backlash against Divinity last year when Larian Studios' CEO admitted the game used generative AI. Gamers didn't care that it was used for workflow; just the mention of AI forced the company to walk it back. Larian Studios declined a request for comment.

There's a fear among the staff of major studios that make AAA games (like Playstation, Xbox, and Rockstar) that CEOs will continue to fall for the potential of AI rather than the reality, and thus gut workplaces. About 45,000 gaming employees lost their jobs from 2022 to the end of 2025, with up to 10,000 layoffs predicted for 2026.

I spoke with several longtime AAA employees, all of whom requested anonymity over fear of retribution in an already volatile industry. A veteran game developer at Xbox says layoffs and fewer job postings have disproportionately impacted junior staffers, and now "everyone is just having seniors do the work." That work is often supplemented with AI. "There was this myth" the developer tells me, that AI is "going to allow devs to focus on, you know, the good stuff, the hard stuff. But the problem is, OK, then who does the basic stuff? And the answer is … no one."

A senior sound designer for one AAA studio says employees go along with AI because they're doing "whatever they can to stay hirable." If they're not "keeping up with the times," or are outwardly anti-AI, they risk their jobs. "Many of my peers are already looking for work in other sectors just to more reliably provide for themselves and their families." Studios have already begun implementing generative AI to speedrun or even bypass character speech, avoiding hiring voice actors.

The only industry workers who could benefit from AI are streamers. Spencer Agnew, director of programming for Smosh Games, thinks cost increases driven by the RAM shortage could mean that gamers unable to play might tune into streams more. "Some streamers could see it as advantageous for their audience to not have access to these games … so they become dependent on the streamer to provide that experience."

In the aftermath of the sunsetting rumors, Xbox announced its next-gen console under the name Project Helix. The company has been running behind in console sales since the release of the Xbox Series X in 2020, selling less than even the original Nintendo Switch in 2025. Project Helix, due within a couple of years, will be an open-platform hybrid PC-console, reportedly with no exclusive titles.

If RAMaggedon continues at its current pace, experts are predicting the cost for this next console will land somewhere between $900 and $1,200, double the price of the last Series X.

A source familiar with Xbox's new strategy assured me the brand is "definitely not in distress" and that, while the latest project may look and feel different, the company is still committed to innovation. As far as AI use, the source claims Xbox will continue "using AI responsibly and transparently" to "both player and dev benefit."

A longtime AAA video game company executive tells me he believes the CEOs insisting AI be integrated into the gaming industry will eventually fail when gaming fans ultimately reject the results. "Because we will not buy their shit. And we will not give them explosive growth. We will not, you know, do cosplay. We will not go to cons. We will not generate merch. We will not make fan fiction. We will not make fan games. Like, we will do none of the things they want, because it sucks."

While employees at major studios feel buckled under AI, consumers can still help dictate where the next 10 years of gaming go. Gamers, rise up.
 
A source familiar with Xbox's new strategy assured me the brand is "definitely not in distress" and that, while the latest project may look and feel different, the company is still committed to innovation. As far as AI use, the source claims Xbox will continue "using AI responsibly and transparently" to "both player and dev benefit."
Trending Love GIF by Likee US

As far as AI, I completely disagree. It's the best invention since the wheel and it will change our lives for the better. We are manufacturing intelligence if you can believe it. We have well founded existential fears based mainly around employment. We are misdirecting our angers away from the devil we know which is human greed over to a new target which is just a tool, AI. A tool that will advance science greatly and improve everyone's quality of life. AI is the future and while we definitely need some education about it, I think we also need to understand that AI isn't causing these issues. That's human shit. The same old human shit that causes all our other issues.

I submit that if we invented replicators from Star Trek many would want them shut down so that the jobs from refining atoms would still exist. Think of that. We would rather have jobs creating smartphones while living in current technology than have a machine in every home that can create anything we can imagine. It shows why the Prime Directive in Star Trek exists. Many of us, and I'm not one of these, but many of us cannot accept change too quickly. We cannot adapt quickly to existential change and this is the reason the Prime Directive in Star Trek exists. We are like a primitive species.
 
Last edited:
I'm a gamer for 40 years and AI isn't a nightmare to me. People keep screaming the sky is falling and I don't buy it. People SHOULD wash-out of the industry. There are way too many do-nothings and talentless hacks. Yeah the price increases blow, small price to pay for innovation though.
 
Last edited:
Boohoo. Game studios MASSIVELY over-hired during the pandemic gaming bubble, and proceeded to make a bunch of Modern Audience slop with ridiculous budgets and development timelines.

They were going to pay the price regardless of AI. AI just makes a nice scapegoat while they cut all these useless people they never should've hired in the first place.
 
The author of the article says he only spoke to devs who did not want to use AI:

None of the developers I spoke with want to use AI

And yet, 36% of developers use AI, according to a 2026 GDC survey. So that's a bias.

and most gamers won't have it, even in limited quantities.

And yet I suspect most gamers do have it in limited quantities, without even knowing it.
 
Last edited:
Trending Love GIF by Likee US

As far as AI, I completely disagree. It's the best invention since the wheel and it will change our lives for the better. We are manufacturing intelligence if you can believe it. We have well founded existential fears based mainly around employment. We are misdirecting our angers away from the devil we know which is human greed over to a new target which is just a tool, AI. A tool that will advance science greatly and improve everyone's quality of life. AI is the future and while we definitely need some education about it, I think we also need to understand that AI isn't causing these issues. That's human shit. The same old human shit that causes all our other issues.

I submit that if we invented replicators from Star Trek many would want them shut down so that the jobs from refining atoms would still exist. Think of that. We would rather have jobs creating smartphones while living in current technology than have a machine in every home that can create anything we can imagine. It shows why the Prime Directive in Star Trek exists. Many of us, and I'm not one of these, but many of us cannot accept change too quickly. We cannot adapt quickly to existential change and this is the reason the Prime Directive in Star Trek exists. We are like a primitive species.
You're out of your fucking mind if you think these people will give a shit about you. Every single one of these major players involved in AI have bunkers to escape the economic turmoil they know their creating by putting AI into the market.

They don't care about you and openly talk about how they want you dead to make way for what's next. Its Eugenics disguised as Utopia.


 
Last edited:
Trending Love GIF by Likee US

As far as AI, I completely disagree. It's the best invention since the wheel and it will change our lives for the better. We are manufacturing intelligence if you can believe it. We have well founded existential fears based mainly around employment.

I agree AI is an extraordinary invention and will probably transform society in ways comparable to the internet or the industrial revolution, especially once AGI is reached.

Saying that, jobs are a massive concern. Without jobs people can't earn a living. Nobody cares about the wonders of AI if they can't pay their bills and put food on the table.

The other worry is what the constant reliance on AI might do to our cognitive abilities. If people start using AI to write every email, plan every idea, and even compose personal things like graduation letters to their kids, we risk outsourcing parts of our thinking and creativity. Skills that used to require effort, such as writing clearly, structuring arguments, expressing emotions in words etc could all be lost and taken over by a clanker.

You may argue that tech has been doing this for a long time. The calculator reduced mental arithmetic skills. Social media reduced attention spans. However, AI could amplify that trend because it doesn't just automate tasks and instead it automates thinking.

Then you get a situation where AI can create art faster than any human. What becomes of us then?

A tool that will advance science greatly and improve everyone's quality of life.

It certainly could, but a majority won't care if they lose their purpose. AI won't pay the mortgage. You can't eat AI. People need to earn money.

I submit that if we invented replicators from Star Trek many would want them shut down so that the jobs from refining atoms would still exist. Think of that. We would rather have jobs creating smartphones while living in current technology than have a machine in every home that can create anything we can imagine.

Star Trek isn't real. If that device was created it would be more disruptive than AI. It would completely break the global economy and put a majority of the planet out of work.

We are like a primitive species.

For AI to be a benefit and for everyone to get on board, the world needs a complete redesign of how economies work. There is no plan for mass unemployment. There is no contingency plan for AGI.
 
People are still trying to tell me that AI will lead to improved games when the examples we have of AI is slop like the Call of Duty art and a website that is literally being written by AI.

We need to be honest about this.The AI future is incredibly grim for everyone but the psycho transhumanists that are pushing this stuff. This is because those transhumanists literally only care about themselves and uploading their brain into a cloud so they can live forever. These are deeply weird and evil people. They would happily cull 90% of humanity when the AI tells them to do it. Listen to what they say, watch what they do, read the people they read like Yuvel Harari. We are being ruled over by misanthropic psychopaths who hate us and do not care one bit about our livelihood or ability to exist in the future they want to create.

For AI to be a benefit and for everyone to get on board, the world needs a complete redesign of how economies work. There is no plan for mass unemployment. There is no contingency plan for AGI.
the plan and redesign is to let most of humanity starve to death. They're not going to take all the supposed surplus wealth they create and redistribute it forever. There's no plan to redistribute because they're not gonna do it.
 
Last edited:
We already live with games built around addiction loops and loot boxes and gacha systems that mirror gambling and people are scared of AI? The industry is already morally and ethically fucked up. AI wouldn't be the worst problem and not even close.
 
The part about people watching streamers more is probably true. I find myself watching some streams as they can be more entertaining than actually playing the game. But not with horror games, it kills the mood when someone like Asmongold says "let's light up this BITCH!" instead of actually thinking that anything is scary.
 
Since AI is a current hot button issue, one thing that comes to mind is a team of artists training AI with their own artwork and then monetizing that AI, specifically, rather than some LLM that just scrapes everything off the internet (illegally)

A wonderful sound guy / music producer named Benn Jordan (who is rather anti ai, to the point of making specific sound sets in order to poison music ai algos. His content is extremely interesting and his music was at the top of what.cd for like a year in the early aughts) did that with a bunch of singers who used their own voices, intentionally, to train a voice AI. They now make tons of money licensing it.

The artists could then touch up/work with what was generated without it being, you know, creatively bankrupt, since they are the ones that provided the training materials for the thing.

That being said, data centers themselves are nightmarish to say the least and if one gets built nearby you should sell your house and leave asap. They are antithetical to pretty much all organic life in the nearby area, and the USA has borderline no protections in place for people in the nearby areas. Thats a problem that nobody is going to do a single thing about for a long time, if ever.
 
We've known for a while that this massive investment in DataCenters is unsustainable and that these companies have no hope of recouping the cost of their investment. They'll have to replace much of what they've already built within 3 years to stay competitive and efficient.
They're giving away an expensive product for free in hopes of getting us hooked on it, nevermind how to make an actual profit - "we'll figure it out later" (basically, the 2nd and 3rd stages of enshittification, and we're still in stage 1). Even the paid subscription AI plans are being sold at a loss.

I've been hearing increased chatter from AI experts that they think once this DataCenter-heavy approach collapses under its own weight, on-device AI processing (running local models that don't rely on the cloud for basic prompts) is likely the way of the future, with occasional assistance from cloud compute for any complex / resource-heavy prompts. That'll be the pendulum swinging back to the norm for consumer electronics: think, "this year's phone can process AI prompts 25% faster than last year's!" sales opportunities... and a return to things being available for us to buy at reasonable prices again.
 
The part about people watching streamers more is probably true. I find myself watching some streams as they can be more entertaining than actually playing the game. But not with horror games, it kills the mood when someone like Asmongold says "let's light up this BITCH!" instead of actually thinking that anything is scary.
Didn't Asmondgolds friends go to his house and have to go to the ER after visiting due to feeling sick?
 
You're out of your fucking mind if you think these people will give a shit about you. Every single one of these major players involved in AI have bunkers to escape the economic turmoil they know their creating by putting AI into the market.

They don't care about you and openly talk about how they want you dead to make way for what's next. Its Eugenics disguised as Utopia.



That guy uses AI to wack off and has decided it's good because of that. Many such cases.
 
Top Bottom