Graphics Horse
Member
Why does he need 4 Mountain Dews?
HALO 4.
Why does he need 4 Mountain Dews?
Lets put an end to backroom politice once and for all.
Well this Wainwright lady is making him look pretty darn good. And smart. (is that sexist?)Being shamed into donating the PS3 is hardly deserving of respect
Why does he need 4 Mountain Dews? I mean even if he plans to eat the entire bag of Doritos, 4 Mountain Dews is too much.
The image really, truly is hilarious, and very telling. Rab Florence wrote a solid article but nothing even necessarily had to be written about it. The image completely speaks for itself.
![]()
Wow, what's the original source for this gif?
Did this article really need to exist in the first place? I read it and it was well done and I agreed with it, but I just feel like the world wouldn't be much of a different place if he never bothered to write it. Only result is now we have this mess on our hands and he no longer has a job.
You'll still see a "mildy respected" games journalist next to a mound of advertising in 2013, I would bet on it.
Did this article really need to exist in the first place? I read it and it was well done and I agreed with it, but I just feel like the world wouldn't be much of a different place if he never bothered to write it. Only result is now we have this mess on our hands and he no longer has a job.
You'll still see a "mildy respected" games journalist next to a mound of advertising in 2013, I would bet on it.
HALO 4.
another one down for the count:
![]()
good night, sweet prince.
Why does he need 4 Mountain Dews? I mean even if he plans to eat the entire bag of Doritos, 4 Mountain Dews is too much.
![]()
Just an excerpt...
Did this article really need to exist in the first place? I read it and it was well done and I agreed with it, but I just feel like the world wouldn't be much of a different place if he never bothered to write it. Only result is now we have this mess on our hands and he no longer has a job.
You'll still see a "mildy respected" games journalist next to a mound of advertising in 2013, I would bet on it.
they've talked about how crappy DC3 is for like two weeks straight now.
Did this article really need to exist in the first place? I read it and it was well done and I agreed with it, but I just feel like the world wouldn't be much of a different place if he never bothered to write it. Only result is now we have this mess on our hands and he no longer has a job.
You'll still see a "mildy respected" games journalist next to a mound of advertising in 2013, I would bet on it.
I can't honestly say Geoff has done ANYTHING for this industry other than infect it with the mountain dew-filled tumor that is the Spike Video Game awards.
If he's done anything else notable, please let me know.
This industry clearly has no standard.
Got to remember that this isn't a witch hunt for people "on the take" for truing to get a ps3. As the article someone posted (that I don't want to go back an entire page to search for the link for) stated, alot of people use these events for self promotion. The original editorial was about how acts like these that have become the norm for people in the industry can easily be seen by others from the outside as a lack of integrity.
Or something.
Did this article really need to exist in the first place? I read it and it was well done and I agreed with it, but I just feel like the world wouldn't be much of a different place if he never bothered to write it. Only result is now we have this mess on our hands and he no longer has a job.
You'll still see a "mildy respected" games journalist next to a mound of advertising in 2013, I would bet on it.
Lets put an end to backroom politice once and for all.
Means very little without a review.
Yes but no journalisty as evident by this Lauren bird will come out and say "HEY GUYS I DIDNT REVIEW IT CUZ I HAVE FRIENDS WHO WORK THERE AND I DONT WANT TO GET THEM POSSIBLY FIRED" instead they'll lie and use a excuse, it's called "backroom politice"
Did this article really need to exist in the first place? I read it and it was well done and I agreed with it, but I just feel like the world wouldn't be much of a different place if he never bothered to write it. Only result is now we have this mess on our hands and he no longer has a job.
You'll still see a "mildy respected" games journalist next to a mound of advertising in 2013, I would bet on it.
another one down for the count:
![]()
good night, sweet prince.
I'm sorry I stand for high morals in my journalistic integrity. That's why I exclusively read IGN.
![]()
PRO BACKROOM POLITICE 4 LYFE
Also, I am a master of MS Paint. Full disclosure.
Studying the events around this article is just as important as studying the picture as the article suggested... if not more so.
I fully understand the point, and grasped it when I first read the article, which is why I asked what I did. Irregardless of intention, the minute you sit down and type someones name in an article involving something questionable, it can plant a seed of doubt in the reader (rightfully so here). So again, my question is, if you're comfortable using names in an opinion piece like this, why the hell are you protecting the people that you actually know are doing wrong?
Did this article really need to exist in the first place? I read it and it was well done and I agreed with it, but I just feel like the world wouldn't be much of a different place if he never bothered to write it. Only result is now we have this mess on our hands and he no longer has a job.
You'll still see a "mildy respected" games journalist next to a mound of advertising in 2013, I would bet on it.
Shouldn't ethics policies in place, prevent its staff from accepting offers or engaging in activities that could otherwise misconstrue their journalistic integrity? In any other industry, accepting offers in this fashion would be grounds for termination.
Did this article really need to exist in the first place? I read it and it was well done and I agreed with it, but I just feel like the world wouldn't be much of a different place if he never bothered to write it. Only result is now we have this mess on our hands and he no longer has a job.
Can someone please fill me in on what happened? I saw the original Dew'ritos video, but I can't quite figure this out.
http://i.imgur.com/CVMP4.jpg[IMG]
Just an excerpt...[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://i.minus.com/ibhn2fk5kmM4sy.gif
I'm sorry I stand for high morals in my journalistic integrity. That's why I exclusively read IGN.
A vapid industry whose opinions are based entirely on hype and the ultimate conclusion of a piece of work is profits and not creating anything warranting actual discussion and substance (the idea of substance is counter-productive to the culture at this point) will never have "journalistic integrity" as it doesn't need journalism in the first place... nor integrity. Such a culture needs shills and shills are what we have. If "Summer Blockbuster Magazine" existed, what would you expect to be reading when you read past the cover? Hard hitting interviews or just advertising and things that might as well be advertising, right?
The so-called "journalism" that we have now is in line with the so-called "culture" where these journalists exist. You are what you eat. That's a rule. The same rule that applies to anything on this planet. People say "empty the seats in congress. That'll fix government!" No, it won't because if you don't change political culture and discourse then you're going to replace bad politician A with bad politician B. You're replacing your fishing net when the real problem is that the pond is barren.
Um, Rab has other outlets like Burnistoun, his wrestling commitments etc![]()
No, it's still disgusting and horrific. Especially when they go on an dreview games that their friends work on without disclosing (like any Harmonix or Double Fine game).
Also funny how they don't review Dance Central 3 because it's a bad game, but felt fine giving great scores to DC1 and 2. Why? Because their friends work at Harmonix who are currently dieing right now.
The problem comes in that Harmonix are having a really hard time right now and are laying people off their friends, so it makes it super shady that theyre not reviewing the game as they possibly don't want to put the well deserved deathknell in.
Ah I'm sorry. Do still think it is because that wasn't the point of the article. The names he named were used as examples, not of corruption, but what could be viewed as it, and had been accepted as normal acts for game journalists. As in, them being named wasn't a point of the editorial, but a way to highlight the point of the article. Naming names he thought were defiantly on the PR take also wasn't the point, and would have turned this into a completely different story.
That is just this man's understanding of it. Sure, it is unfortunate for the people who's names that got used, but nothing said was an untruth. One (Cook) responded with admitting that things could be seen that way, and made sure to show he was donating the free gift he got, another didn't comment at all, and the last is who the current subject of discussion is.
Maybe Polygon could address their questioned integrity by taking on Rab now?
Wow. This whole affair is a damning indictment on this industry.