• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

George W. Bush Bashes Obama on Middle East

Status
Not open for further replies.

thefro

Member
It's funny George Bush has the audacity to criticize Obama on American safety when the largest terrorist attack in modern history on the planet occurred under Bush's watch, on American soil, and Bush sat idly by while North Korea successfully developed nuclear weapons, passed ineffective sanctions against Iran, and destabilized the middle east through the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and the creation of ISIS as a result of these actions.

Fuck you George.

Don't forget he was buddies with Putin, and "saw into his soul" and knew he was a good man and great leader.
 
Obama basically gave back everything gained through the surge in Iraq and that country is a fucking mess with Iranian forces running around, Syria is a mess, Afghanistan is a mess, Yemen is a mess, Libya is a mess, six and a half years in office and at some point Obama has to take some responsibility for making the middle east a complete clusterfuck, there's no way around it.

yea Obama did all that lol.

he is just one dude.
 
Also all George Bush did for Iran is pass sanctions and push them into a corner. It did absolutely nothing to deter them from pursuing uranium enrichment programs, since such technology would, whether used for civilian energy programs (as Iran claims) or weapons programs (as Bush's wonderful intelligence community claimed), give Iran extra bargaining power and leverage on the international stage.

It's funny George Bush has the audacity to criticize Obama on American safety when the largest terrorist attack in modern history on the planet occurred under Bush's watch, on American soil, and Bush sat idly by while North Korea successfully developed nuclear weapons, passed ineffective sanctions against Iran, and destabilized the middle east through the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan and the creation of ISIS as a direct result of these actions.

Fuck you George.

Well put, even if I did ftfy :)
 
Obama basically gave back everything gained through the surge in Iraq and that country is a fucking mess with Iranian forces running around, Syria is a mess, Afghanistan is a mess, Yemen is a mess, Libya is a mess, six and a half years in office and at some point Obama has to take some responsibility for making the middle east a complete clusterfuck, there's no way around it.
Seems incredibly simplistic.

There's virtually nothing he could have done to make these countries stable without apologizing for something.
 
ojVeuve.png


this is a living parody
 

entremet

Member
Still wondering how that dude got elected twice.
Oh, he cheated, right.

The first election was pretty close and he was not really well known. Gore's campaign was terrible and he was destroyed by the NRA mobilizing against him.

The second election was lost mostly due to the war. America tends to prefer incumbents during wartime.
 

Prine

Banned
Fuck off Bush. You destroyed that region and most of the world (Europe especially )is dealing with your cock up. Refugees, border issues and mass instability it because of your meddling.
 

Nivash

Member
GWB is responsible for the greatest military blunder in recent US history. I'd say that with hindsight and considering outcomes like ISIS and the complete destabilisation of the ME that in a large part was influenced by the Invasion of Iraq it's even worse than Vietnam. While 'Nam cost more American lives, on the strategic level it only led to the loss of a single US-friendly country (which wasn't that great of an ally to begin with and would have been lost without the war in any case) and some spillover effects into countries that weren't friendly anyway. It pales in comparison to the complete chaos that's overtaken the ME now, not to mention that the Great Failure in Iraq completely hamstrung the US' ability to respond to it.

And he has the gall to criticise anyone on geostrategic issues? It's as if Nixon had risen from his grave to criticize how Clinton handled the Lewinsky affair.
 

unsightly

Member
why is this news

whoever said they hope Bush comes out for this election in order to 'jog Americans' memories'... you have given this country's collective IQ far, far too much credit. If anything, Americans would be swayed to vote for whoever Bush endorsed.

as an abject nihilist, this amuses me
 
He defended his own administration’s handling of terrorism, noting that the terrorist Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who confessed to killing Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, was captured on his watch: “Just remember the guy who slit Danny Pearl’s throat is in Gitmo, and now they're doing it on TV.”

Ooooh, super-impressive considering his successor took out Osama bin Laden.
 

geardo

Member
Obama basically gave back everything gained through the surge in Iraq

Bush negotiated our withdrawal from Iraq. Obama tried to keep troops there, but the Iraqi government refused to allow it without American troops being subject to the Iraqi justice system.

How many more years should we have stayed in that godforsaken country training that useless army of theirs? How many more Americans are you willing to throw into the meat-grinder?
 

Blader

Member
There are thousands of dead Americans who are only dead because of Bush. When it comes to national security and protecting his country, Bush has absolutely no leg to stand on.
 

gogosox82

Member
Obama basically gave back everything gained through the surge in Iraq and that country is a fucking mess with Iranian forces running around, Syria is a mess, Afghanistan is a mess, Yemen is a mess, Libya is a mess, six and a half years in office and at some point Obama has to take some responsibility for making the middle east a complete clusterfuck, there's no way around it.

I swear there's always one guy in these threads who says stuff like this.
1) Iraq exit strategy was W's idea, not Obamas.
2) Iraq wanted us to leave. Are we supposed to stay even though they don't want us there?
3) Afghanistan historically has always been a mess as well as most of the middle east for that matter. Only a few countries (Israel, Turkey, and recently Iran) have ever been stable. Kind of hard to blame Obama for a region that generally has a history of being unstable.
 
The worst aspect of Obama administration (and Obama himself) is his refusal to go back and prosecute the entire Bush administration for lying to American people about Iraq. Seriously, if there is one single apt use of "Fuck Obama" its in this case.

These motherfuckers should be behind bars.
 

dabig2

Member
why is this news

whoever said they hope Bush comes out for this election in order to 'jog Americans' memories'... you have given this country's collective IQ far, far too much credit. If anything, Americans would be swayed to vote for whoever Bush endorsed.

as an abject nihilist, this amuses me

The people "swayed" by Bush were never going to vote any other way. There's a reason he's been in hiding for the past 6 years. Dude wasn't even mentioned in the 2012 Republican convention and Jeb only refers to him as "my brother" and he's done even that very sparingly.
 
We can start blaming clinton then wb then reagan then carter then everyone rider before if you want

Don't forget clinton pussied out on bombing bin laden. TWICE

None of them were president when the planes hit the twin towers. Bush was. Clinton didn't pussy out on bombing Bin Laden either. 75 cruise missiles were fired at bases in Afghanistan including one where Bin Laden was at but he had left hours before.
 
it's even worse than Vietnam.
I guess if you ignore the enormous body counts from that war and the devastation in Laos and Cambodia, putting moral considerations to the side, what you're saying may be factually accurate. But I would say the bigger strategic blunder was after the first Gulf War, not allowing Iraqi Shia to overthrow the regime internally.
 

Enron

Banned
Why is it that every republican is acting like the deal is "In exchange for lifting sanctions against Iran, Iran gets to develop a nuclear bomb?"



The deal is that sanctions are lifted if they stop their nuclear programs!


Because most do not actually expect them to stop. A recent ABC/Wash Post poll found that among all respondents (not taking into account whether they support or are against the deal) 59% have "little to no confidence" that Iran will abide by the terms of the deal.

The first election was pretty close and he was not really well known.

I'm sorry, but what? GWB was part of a political dynasty, was one of the most visible governors for years of Texas, and was probably top 5 in prominent Republicans not already on the Hill.
 

Theonik

Member
Because most do not actually expect them to stop. A recent ABC/Wash Post poll found that among all respondents (not taking into account whether they support or are against the deal) 59% have "little to no confidence" that Iran will abide by the terms of the deal.
What do you propose to do to stop them because if you consider this to be the case the sanctions definitely didn't work.
 
I mean, he's of course wrong, but he's pandering to a room of rich conservatives. They don't want to hear "I think Barack's doing a swell job"

Georgey Boy is just working that hustle right now
 

Enron

Banned
What do you propose to do to stop them because if you consider this to be the case the sanctions definitely didn't work.

There is nothing you really can do. Your choices are 1) ramp up the punishment or 2) covertly destroy it. The United States is willing to do 2), but only to a certain extent - like Stuxnet, etc. Israel is willing to go further - to gas up the bombers and hit their facilities, take out their scientists, etc etc. and they are going to do whatever they think is necessary with or without our approval.

The best hope for an abandonment of an Iranian nuclear weapons program is for the regime to be toppled and replaced with a more moderate one (the Iranian people aren't nearly as conservative nutso as their rulers are) but there's no way in hell that's going to happen.
 
Bush then went into a detailed criticism of Obama’s policies in fighting the Islamic State and dealing with the chaos in Iraq. On Obama’s decision to withdraw all U.S. troops in Iraq at the end of 2011, he quoted Senator Lindsey Graham calling it a “strategic blunder.” Bush signed an agreement with the Iraqi government to withdraw those troops, but the idea had been to negotiate a new status of forces agreement to keep U.S. forces there past 2011. The Obama administration tried and failed to negotiate such an agreement.

I just can't even...

I mean, this fucking guy knows why we withdrew from Iraq, right? Surely he knows that a prime minister hand-picked by his administration forced us to withdraw, right?
 

entremet

Member
Because most do not actually expect them to stop. A recent ABC/Wash Post poll found that among all respondents (not taking into account whether they support or are against the deal) 59% have "little to no confidence" that Iran will abide by the terms of the deal.



I'm sorry, but what? GWB was part of a political dynasty, was one of the most visible governors for years of Texas, and was probably top 5 in prominent Republicans not already on the Hill.

I'm talking about Presidential track record, which would've been impossible to have at the time.

When people ask why was he elected twice, they miss that point.
 
Bush would have done well for himself and everyone else to just stay out of politics for the rest of his life. He had his shot at that job, it's time for him to just put it all behind him.
 

FiggyCal

Banned
There is nothing you really can do. Your choices are 1) ramp up the punishment or 2) covertly destroy it. The United States is willing to do 2), but only to a certain extent - like Stuxnet, etc. Israel is willing to go further - to gas up the bombers and hit their facilities, take out their scientists, etc etc. and they are going to do whatever they think is necessary with or without our approval.

The best hope for an abandonment of an Iranian nuclear weapons program is for the regime to be toppled and replaced with a more moderate one (the Iranian people aren't nearly as conservative nutso as their rulers are) but there's no way in hell that's going to happen.

And you don't think ramping up the punishments would have the adverse affect of making Iranians more conservative and hostile?
 

entremet

Member
well, the same would go for Gore then, since he was never President either. And no, VP duties aren't anything like being the President.

Sure.

I'm just saying that many non-Americans always bring up the point of him being elected twice as some sort judgment on America.

He was actually a decent candidate in 2000. He ran a good campaign and was very likable and he didn't have a track record of incompetency yet.
 

thefro

Member
I'm sorry, but what? GWB was part of a political dynasty, was one of the most visible governors for years of Texas, and was probably top 5 in prominent Republicans not already on the Hill.

People knew him, but we didn't know what type of President he'd be. He ran as a "compassionate conservative", not on bombing Iraq. Family values, reasonable foreign policy, smart government, cut the deficit, cut taxes, etc. Seemed like a decent guy and he was more articulate then than he was later on.

A lot of people online said there was basically no difference between Gore & Bush, stay home or vote Nader, etc.
 

geardo

Member
There is nothing you really can do. Your choices are 1) ramp up the punishment or 2) covertly destroy it. The United States is willing to do 2), but only to a certain extent - like Stuxnet, etc. Israel is willing to go further - to gas up the bombers and hit their facilities, take out their scientists, etc etc. and they are going to do whatever they think is necessary with or without our approval.

The best hope for an abandonment of an Iranian nuclear weapons program is for the regime to be toppled and replaced with a more moderate one (the Iranian people aren't nearly as conservative nutso as their rulers are) but there's no way in hell that's going to happen.

Yes, let's start a war with Iran because that would be brilliant. How about we at least attempt to honor our deal with them?
 

Theonik

Member
There is nothing you really can do. Your choices are 1) ramp up the punishment or 2) covertly destroy it. The United States is willing to do 2), but only to a certain extent - like Stuxnet, etc. Israel is willing to go further - to gas up the bombers and hit their facilities, take out their scientists, etc etc. and they are going to do whatever they think is necessary with or without our approval.

The best hope for an abandonment of an Iranian nuclear weapons program is for the regime to be toppled and replaced with a more moderate one (the Iranian people aren't nearly as conservative nutso as their rulers are) but there's no way in hell that's going to happen.
These are both options that have been explored though and were not really successful and no-one except equally insane people like Bibi are willing to go further, to attack Iran outright would be madness. The third option is to try and negotiate a deal with Iran but obviously you have the trust factor to torpedo these talks.

Arguably you also have the point that toppling Iran's regime will be far worse for the region, and to suggest it shows a lack of understanding for politics in the Middle East. A lot of those countries are stable exactly because of the arrangements they have and in most cases something like this was done there was massive unrest in the resulting power vacuum that was left which leads to worse elements like ISIS to gain a strong footing.

The other reason to negotiate with Iran is that Iran is seen as an extra block to ISIS expanding and they know that, Obama also knows that, everyone knows that.
 

Enron

Banned
And you don't think ramping up the punishments would have the adverse affect of making Iranians more conservative and hostile?

I said those were really the only two other choices.

Arguably you also have the point that toppling Iran's regime will be far worse for the region, and to suggest it shows a lack of understanding for politics in the Middle East.

Oh, and I suppose you are a middle eastern scholar, then.

I didn't say that was a good idea. I said that's about the best chance for Iran to give up nuclear weapon ambitions.
 
The best hope for an abandonment of an Iranian nuclear weapons program is for the regime to be toppled and replaced with a more moderate one (the Iranian people aren't nearly as conservative nutso as their rulers are) but there's no way in hell that's going to happen.

That always works out swell for the U.S.
 

Link

The Autumn Wind
I mean, he's of course wrong, but he's pandering to a room of rich conservatives. They don't want to hear "I think Barack's doing a swell job"

Georgey Boy is just working that hustle right now
He's pandering to Israel, who pretty much want the rest of the Middle East bombed into oblivion.
 

gdt

Member
Come on Bush, what are you doing.

These ex pres guys usually try to keep shut.

But I guess with baby bro coming up he's gotta starting shilling a bit.
 

dabig2

Member
There is nothing you really can do. Your choices are 1) ramp up the punishment or 2) covertly destroy it. The United States is willing to do 2), but only to a certain extent - like Stuxnet, etc. Israel is willing to go further - to gas up the bombers and hit their facilities, take out their scientists, etc etc. and they are going to do whatever they think is necessary with or without our approval.

Neither of those choices did or will work. How about going at it a different way instead of repeating failure after failure while enduring untold amounts of human suffering.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom