Let f be a function defined and continuous on the closed interval [a, b]. If f has a relative maximum at c and a < c < b , which of the following statements must be true?
I. f ' (c) exists.
II. If f ' (c) exists, then f'(c) = 0.
III. If f '' (c) exists, then f '' (c) is less than or equal to 0.
(A) II only
(B) III only
(C) I and II only
(D) I and III only
(E) II and III only
I can't eliminate any of the three statements. f ' (c) must exist according to the mean value theorem, even without the information that it's a relative maximum.
The second derivative test states that a relative maximum at f(c) for a continuous function means that f(c) is concave down ( f '' (c) is < 0 ) or f(c) is an inflection point (f '' (c) would equal 0, in that case ).
Is the answer D, because f isn't necessarily defined as being differentiable at c?
I. f ' (c) exists.
II. If f ' (c) exists, then f'(c) = 0.
III. If f '' (c) exists, then f '' (c) is less than or equal to 0.
(A) II only
(B) III only
(C) I and II only
(D) I and III only
(E) II and III only
I can't eliminate any of the three statements. f ' (c) must exist according to the mean value theorem, even without the information that it's a relative maximum.
The second derivative test states that a relative maximum at f(c) for a continuous function means that f(c) is concave down ( f '' (c) is < 0 ) or f(c) is an inflection point (f '' (c) would equal 0, in that case ).
Is the answer D, because f isn't necessarily defined as being differentiable at c?